The following links lead to the full text from the respective local libraries:
Alternatively, you can try to access the desired document yourself via your local library catalog.
If you have access problems, please contact us.
Search results
Filter
189 results
Sort by:
Checking availability at your location
This journal is also available at your library: |
electronic
print
Checking availability at your location
This journal is also available at your library: |
electronic
print
Checking availability at your location
This journal is also available at your library: |
electronic
print
Checking availability at your location
This journal is also available at your library: |
electronic
print
Checking availability at your location
This journal is also available at your library: |
electronic
print
Checking availability at your location
This journal is also available at your library: |
electronic
print
Checking availability at your location
This journal is also available at your library: |
electronic
print
Open Access#82017
Thucydides' realism in international relations
Thucydides is considered to be the founder of political realism. Even in those times he determined the basic premises of realism - security and survival. He made an impact on subsequent development of realism embodied in the works of Machiavelli, Hobbes, Morgenthau, Car, Niebuhr, Aaron, Waltz etc. They will call the system of international relations as anarchical one since there is no supreme arbitrator which will force states to adequate behaviour. His views of realism were given in the volume 'The Peloponnesian War' where he had determined the anarchy of the relationships among states. Such system did not rely on justice and morale, but force and power were the predominant facts. He also introduces the category of just wars by claiming that Sparta led a just war against the increased power of Athens, and observed morale principles. Nevertheless, Thucydides faces contradictory, since Sparta itself as the largest land force of that time had to use force in order to beat Athens. He went ahead since he considered force and power as a necessary condition to achieve other objectives, which was later on adopted by Raymond Aaron. Following the example of the war between Athens and Sparta, he successfully analysed bipolar system of balance of power in which the conflict between the leading members of the two opposite blocks was possible in the end, while beforehand there should have been conflicts among weaker members of both blocks. Thucydides explained the manifestation of force and power using example of the Melian dialogue between the envoys of Athens and Melos. It was about the pure politics of force of Athens regardless of the fact that Melos had its independence.
BASE
Checking availability at your location
This journal is also available at your library: |
electronic
print
Checking availability at your location
This journal is also available at your library: |
electronic
print
Checking availability at your location
This journal is also available at your library: |
electronic
print
Checking availability at your location
This journal is also available at your library: |
electronic
print
Checking availability at your location
This journal is also available at your library: |
electronic
print
Checking availability at your location
This journal is also available at your library: |
electronic
print
Checking availability at your location
This journal is also available at your library: |
electronic
print