Search results

König, E.; Haas, H.: IFOR-SFOR, das Problem Frieden zu schaffen in Bosnien-Herzegowina. - S.15-46

Silvestri, S.: The Mediterranean. Strategic and military aspects. - S. 179-188. Joffe, G.: The Mediterranean and Europe - the nature of challenge. - S. 189-202. Reiffers, J.-L.: The economic challenge of the euro-Mediterranean partnership. - S. 203-216. Scoullos, M. J.: An overview attempt on the evolution of European environmental policies in the Mediterranean. - S. 217-235. Ferrero-Waldner, B.: The Barcelona Process. With our eyes on the future and our feet on the ground. - S. 236-242. El-Shazli, M.: Peace in the Middle-East and its relation to the Barcelona Process. - S. 243-248. Köhler, M.: For a policy of proximity with the Mediterranean region. The Barcelona Process on the framework of EU external relations. - S. 249-257

There is little politicians and administrations fear more than being taken off guard and ill-prepared by a major incident. However inadequate the planning and instruments, decisions must be made and action taken. As such, unexpected events expose decision-makers to the risks of portentous decisions arrived at under conditions of great uncertainty, and usually also in great haste. Space for reflection, analysis and consultation is scarce. The problem is heightened in the sphere of foreign and security policy, with its multitude of actors, interests and influences: here, the unexpected is to be expected (see SWP Foresight Studies from 2011 and 2013). Revolutionary upheavals and power struggles frequently obliterate the bounds of orderly political process. Recent examples include developments in the Middle East and North Africa since 2011 and Russia's response to the toppling of the government in Ukraine in early 2014. Retrospective analyses of unexpected events often reveal that there were in fact warning signs. Indeed, these are generally even recognised in good time – but not interpreted as they would have in light of their later relevance. Therefore, the authors of the third SWP Foresight Study discuss possible future scenarios that already deserve more political attention today. The common starting point for all contributions is that the outlined situation would present German (and EU) foreign and security policy with grave challenges, regardless of whether the character of the events is more of a crisis or an opportunity. (author's abstract)

How might we have to imagine the Middle East if there were a political thaw between Iran and Saudi Arabia? Could Turkey leave NATO in the near future? What would happen if security-related EU databases were successfully hacked; if South Korea were to arm itself with nuclear weapons; or if an American woman were to head the United Nations? Of course, these situations, as explored in the SWP's latest Foresight research paper, are only hypothetical. Why address them? Because unexpected events have abounded in international politics in recent years. Brexit; the election of Donald Trump as US President; and Russia's annexation of Crimea are only the most striking examples. Science and politics should therefore ready themselves for likely future surprises. The Foresight research paper aims to assist with this. We cannot and do not want to predict the future. However, with the help of systematic foresight we can better prepare for unplanned situations. This means improving our view of conceivable - albeit unlikely - developments that would seriously impact on German and European foreign and security policy. It also includes reviewing previous expectations – as this research paper likewise tackles. What actually happened to the battery revolution that was supposed to secure our power supply? Did the negotiation process on the UK's withdrawal from the EU unfold as experts had anticipated? Such reviews are instructive, and can be used to gain insights for the future. (author's abstract)

Beeinflussen Massenmedien den Gang der internationalen Politik? Alexander Brand gibt hierauf eine differenzierte Antwort, die Medien weder zu Sündenböcken für fehlgeschlagene politische Projekte macht noch deren eigenständige Wirkmächtigkeit abstreitet. Auch widerspricht er einer technologiefixierten Lesart, wie sie bei der Rede vom »CNN-Effekt« oder der »Twitter-Revolution« dominiert. Auf der Basis eines modifizierten konstruktivistischen Ansatzes für die Internationalen Beziehungen erläutert die Studie, wo genau sich Medieneffekte in internationalen politischen Dynamiken niederschlagen - und

With which autocratic states should German cultivate foreign relations? How should such relations be approached? How do other democratic regimes deal with authoritarian regimes? These are the key questions addressed in the current Volume 30 of the Annals of the German Council on Foreign Relations (DGAP). Over 50 experts from the realms of academia, business, and politics engage in rigorous analysis to illuminate policy options.