Search results

Interregionalism and the Americas: a conceptual framework / Gian Luca Gardini and Andrés Malamud -- Reframing multilevel interregionalism between Latin America and the EU / Anna Ayuso -- EU-CELAC: a multi-player interregionalism: redefining the Atlantic area / Mario Torres Jarrøn -- The strategic partnership between Brazil and the EU: motives and consequences / Nelia Miguel Müller -- Brazil in the BRICS: towards new forms of hybrid-interregionalism / Christina Stolte -- Overlapping interregionalism, identities, and transatlantic security governance: NATO, the EU, and the OSCE / Simon Koschut -- Interregionalism and the Trump disruption: the transatlantic trade and investment partnership: a post-mortem / Andreas Falke -- Trade interregionalism between South America and Southern Africa / Frank Mattheis -- Cuba as an example of trans-Atlantic conflict, shifting triangles, and incomplete hybrid interregionalism / Susanne Gratius -- Re-mapping Latin America and East Asia interregional relations / Gonzalo S. Paz -- The language of inter-American relations: a sentiment analysis / Sara Ruiz Valverde.

Katada reviews INTERREGIONALISM AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS edited by Heiner Hanggi, Ralf Roloff, and Jurgen Ruland.

Interregionalism and International Relations, Heiner
Hänggi, Ralf Roloff and Jürgen Rüland, eds., Routledge
Advances in International Relations and Global Politics; London:
Routledge, 2006, pp. 364.How do we explain a widespread international phenomenon that only
occasionally contributes to the geo-strategic or economic interests of the
participating states? This book is about interregionalism, the
international organizations and institutions that link regional
organizations from more than one region of the world (as, for example,
ASEM, also known as Asia-Europe Meeting) or that span across more than one
region, such as APEC (Asia-Pacific Economic Co-operation) or FTAA (Free
Trade Area of the Americas). The fact is that few of these institutions
have accomplished much in concrete terms, yet they continue to
proliferate, as the four-and-a-half page list of acronyms at the beginning
of this volume amply demonstrates.

This paper reviews the edited volume titled The Unintended Consequences of Interregionalism: Effects on Regional Actors, Societies and Structures. The book offers an alternative perspective to studies on interregionalism. Despite not being a new phenomenon, interregional dialogues between regional groups from different parts of the world have resurged since the 1990s, together with many studies trying to define and analyze them. Yet, most of the existing works on the topic adopt a deductive approach, contain a Euro-centric focus, and highlight whether interregional dialogues achieved what they intended. The Unintended Consequences of Interregionalism breaks these norms. It not only approaches the topic inductively but also considers myriad regionalisms. Accordingly, the various regions produce distinct "regionalisms" and, therefore, a plethora of "interregionalisms" exist. The edited volume supplies a unique perspective—one that grapples with the unintended outcomes of interregional interactions.

This last decade, regional organizations progressively became
unavoidable actors of regional health governance and have been supported by some global health actors to strengthen such a role. Among these actors, the European Union (EU) is the only regional organization that implements health initiatives in cooperation with its regional counterparts. This article focuses on such "health interregionalism" toward Southeast Asia and Africa and in the field of communicable diseases, with the main objective of assessing its nature and identifying its main functions. It concludes that although appreciated and needed, the EU's health interregionalism should better reflect the EU's experience in regional health governance in order to represent a unique instrument of development aid and an added value for regional organizations

Sejak tahun 1970an ASEAN telah mengembangkan bi-regional arrangement dengan organisasi regional di luar kawasan Asia Tenggara dan hybrid interregionalism dengan negara-negara yang memiliki pengaruh di kawasan ini. Anggota-anggota ASEAN juga secara individual mengambil peran aktif dalam transregional arrangement dengan negara-negara non anggota ASEAN. Ragam interregionalisme semakin diperkuat sejak pemimpin-pemimpin ASEAN mencanangkan cita-cita pembentukan komunitas ASEAN di tahun 2003.Penelitian ini mengkaji kontribusi interregionalisme yang melibatkan ASEAN sebagai organisasi maupun negara-negara secara individual terhadap proses pembentukan komunitas ASEAN. Penelitian ini mengikuti argumentasi teoretisi Transaksionalisme, yang menyatakan bahwa interaksi intens dan ekstensif di antara aktor-aktor regional sangat penting untuk menghasilkan fondansi 'we feeling' yang fundamental bagi pembentukan komunitas regional. Berangkat dari konsepsi ini, penelitian ini melihat bahwa faktor determinan untuk penguatan institusi regional bersifat endogenous – terkait kemampuan bangsa-bangsa untuk mendefinisikan identitas regional, membangun kerangka normatif dan organisasional yang menjadi 'code of conduct' dalam interaksi reguler mereka; pendefinisian identitas regional ini merupakan hasil interaksi yang intens dan ekstensif di antara aktor-aktor yang menjadi bagian dalam proses integrasi. Pertanyaan penelitian tentang hubungan interregionalisme dan pembentukan komunitas ASEAN ini menjadi menarik untuk dikaji lebih jauh karena interregionalisme bersentuhan erat dengan faktor yang bersifat exogenous yang berpotensi untuk memperlemah pembentukan 'identitas regional'.Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa bi-regional arrangement dan hybrid interregionalism yang dikembangkan negara-negara ASEAN secara kolektif-institusional maupun transregional arrangement yang melibatkan negara-negara dengan kapasitas individual masing telah menjadikan konstruksi komunitas ASEAN lebih bersifat terbuka dan adaptif terhadap pengaruh ekstra regional. Interregionalisme telah membantu negara-negara anggota untuk memperkuat modalitas dan kapasitas bagi integrasi politik keamanan dan ekonomik dan memfasilitasi konektivitas di antara bangsa-bangsa Asia Tenggara; dan dengan demikian secara potensial menumbuhkan nilai-nilai ke-ASEAN-an di antara mereka. Namun demikian, interregionalisme membawa tantangan aktual serius bagi konsolidasi integrasi ASEAN di bidang ekonomik dan politik-keamanan; konstruksi ASEAN tetap akan dipengaruhi oleh pengaruh-pengaruh eksternal yang diciptakan oleh mitra-mitra interregional ASEAN.