Search results

Adapted from the source document.

This final course paper studies the job placement and state employment organization. The main body consists of three parts. Part One analyses the conception of job placement and state employment, reveals the essence of these institutions of law, introduces criteria distinguishing between self employment and state employment, as well as the employment system working in the Soviet period, describes kinds of employment, shows some problems of these institutions of law connected with insufficient legal regulation of some aspects as well as with set public understanding of these fenomena. Part One also studies the reform of laws regulating state employment support, describes the peculiar features of the employment market in present-day Lithuania, discloses the conception of unemployment and the characteristics of the unemployed. Part Two deals with the executive system of job placement and state employment, as well as with the aspects of distribution of performers' competences. This part consists of four subparts, each introducing the main representatives taking part in the job placement and employment support. More attention is paid to employment intermediary services and employment market professional training services. Apart from the main representatives mentioned above, there is also shown the employer and his role in the process. This part examines the aims and goals of all the participants supporting state employment policy and their functions. Finally, this part suggests creating clearer border lines of performers' competences. Part Three reveals the essence of job placement and state employment support measures. This part consists of several subparts, namely vacancies registration, state employment general services and special conditions of their realization, active employment market policy measures, peculiarities of employing the European Union citizens and other foreigners. The conclusion presents the results derived from the research into the job placement and state employment organization in the Republic of Lithuania.

This final course paper studies the job placement and state employment organization. The main body consists of three parts. Part One analyses the conception of job placement and state employment, reveals the essence of these institutions of law, introduces criteria distinguishing between self employment and state employment, as well as the employment system working in the Soviet period, describes kinds of employment, shows some problems of these institutions of law connected with insufficient legal regulation of some aspects as well as with set public understanding of these fenomena. Part One also studies the reform of laws regulating state employment support, describes the peculiar features of the employment market in present-day Lithuania, discloses the conception of unemployment and the characteristics of the unemployed. Part Two deals with the executive system of job placement and state employment, as well as with the aspects of distribution of performers' competences. This part consists of four subparts, each introducing the main representatives taking part in the job placement and employment support. More attention is paid to employment intermediary services and employment market professional training services. Apart from the main representatives mentioned above, there is also shown the employer and his role in the process. This part examines the aims and goals of all the participants supporting state employment policy and their functions. Finally, this part suggests creating clearer border lines of performers' competences. Part Three reveals the essence of job placement and state employment support measures. This part consists of several subparts, namely vacancies registration, state employment general services and special conditions of their realization, active employment market policy measures, peculiarities of employing the European Union citizens and other foreigners. The conclusion presents the results derived from the research into the job placement and state employment organization in the Republic of Lithuania.

The United States of America and France are states that have much in common. The USA has the greatest political, economic and military power in the world, and France held this position before the Second World War. Both, the Unites States and France, were the sources of democratic values in the eighteenth century. Currently the two countries have the same values and objectives for the world community: defence of human rights, promotion of democracy, maintenance of international stability and peace, fight against terrorism. However, France has always opposed the United States on one issue or other. It may be in the realm of international diplomacy, where one can discern a distinct distaste for America's oftproclaimed sole-superpower status, or on matters of culture, where France is always the first to denounce American "cultural imperialism." Lately, Franco – American friction has manifested itself most visibly in the UN Security Council over the Iraq war. Both countries realized the necessity to disarm Iraq yet France opposed the resolution authorizing the war against Iraq. France's antipathy to war, pessimism to crate stability in Iraq and refusal to recognize the leadership of the United States can be conceived as the reasons of the opposition. France is no longer the superpower that it was, and that leads to a strategic difference in how the two countries pursue their goals. [.].

The United States of America and France are states that have much in common. The USA has the greatest political, economic and military power in the world, and France held this position before the Second World War. Both, the Unites States and France, were the sources of democratic values in the eighteenth century. Currently the two countries have the same values and objectives for the world community: defence of human rights, promotion of democracy, maintenance of international stability and peace, fight against terrorism. However, France has always opposed the United States on one issue or other. It may be in the realm of international diplomacy, where one can discern a distinct distaste for America's oftproclaimed sole-superpower status, or on matters of culture, where France is always the first to denounce American "cultural imperialism." Lately, Franco – American friction has manifested itself most visibly in the UN Security Council over the Iraq war. Both countries realized the necessity to disarm Iraq yet France opposed the resolution authorizing the war against Iraq. France's antipathy to war, pessimism to crate stability in Iraq and refusal to recognize the leadership of the United States can be conceived as the reasons of the opposition. France is no longer the superpower that it was, and that leads to a strategic difference in how the two countries pursue their goals. [.].

The United States of America and France are states that have much in common. The USA has the greatest political, economic and military power in the world, and France held this position before the Second World War. Both, the Unites States and France, were the sources of democratic values in the eighteenth century. Currently the two countries have the same values and objectives for the world community: defence of human rights, promotion of democracy, maintenance of international stability and peace, fight against terrorism. However, France has always opposed the United States on one issue or other. It may be in the realm of international diplomacy, where one can discern a distinct distaste for America's oftproclaimed sole-superpower status, or on matters of culture, where France is always the first to denounce American "cultural imperialism." Lately, Franco – American friction has manifested itself most visibly in the UN Security Council over the Iraq war. Both countries realized the necessity to disarm Iraq yet France opposed the resolution authorizing the war against Iraq. France's antipathy to war, pessimism to crate stability in Iraq and refusal to recognize the leadership of the United States can be conceived as the reasons of the opposition. France is no longer the superpower that it was, and that leads to a strategic difference in how the two countries pursue their goals. [.].

Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia are nation-states that have all of the essential attributes of modern statehood. At first they had established themselves as ethnocultural nation-states, later lost their independence and then reemerged straight into the world which was hardly influenced by globalization and regional integration. The principle of "one nation, one language, one culture, one state" was already ideologically obsolete in modern discourse, however this was the basic principle on which the Baltic States were created. The nation-state in this thesis will be understood not only as territorial-political entity, but also as a social actor which puts efforts in political community building and reproducing it. In order to achieve these goals nation-state uses various institutional mechanisms; invokes legal remedies and arguments of inward values. Constructivist approach can help to investigate the processes of political community building in the Baltic States and to identify substantial fields of politics that determine the perception of political community. This also allows comparing them in a broader perspective – with "ideal types" of nation-state that appeared in the West. History, language and citizenship – these are the attributes that provide the political communities of the Baltic States with content and form; therefore the comparison of the policies towards those attributes indicates differences which determine different models of political community-shaping in the Baltic States. Latvian and Estonian models resemble the "German" type of nation-state, while Lithuanian model seems to go through the transformation – recedes from historically closest "German" model and approaches "French" type of nation-state. Such tendencies are determined by cultural experiences, ethnic composition and by giving importance to a particular historical heritage.

Regimes During the State of War, Enhanced Protection and the State of Emergency in Interwar Lithuania In the Master's thesis " Regimes During the State of War, Enhanced Protection and the State of Emergency in Interwar Lithuania " the aim is to analyze the types of emergency regimes, that existed in Lithuania during the interwar period. Another aim is to present the consequences these regimes produced. The paper presents the following regimes: state of war and enhanced protection and sets to describe and compare the various regimes during intewar period. Master's thesis has a clear goal to define and grasp various concepts of various states of exception and to point out the interaction between theoretical and practical notions of the state of emergency. The first part of the work presents the historical overview of the interwar period in Lithuania, revealing the political situation and geopolitical circumstances. Leaning upon the works of historians and scientific material, highlighted are the events and reasons for the introduction of states of emergency in the interwar Lithuania. The first part is divided into four sections, which help to systematically and broadly look at the whole set of circumstances, which created the preconditions for emergency law measures to become a phenomenon that accompanied the Republic of Lithuania throughout the interwar period. The second part focuses on states of exception as a category studied by the science of legal theory. Since the various states of emergency is the consequence of various circumstances, the aim is to broaden the theoretical concepts, institutes and attitudes from the perspective of emergency regimes, while simultaneously seeking answers to the question: what is a state of exception? The author, based on the scientific sources legal theory, compares some of the concepts of the state of exception and presents them in a doctrinal sense. The third part gives a detailed overview of the emergency regimes operating during the interwar period in the Republic of Lithuania. Different sources and provisions of different laws are analyzed. It reveals, how the constantly implemented state of war became a huge part of the day to day life, which influenced the whole country's society, legal environment and political situation. The third part also raises the question of whether the permanent status of state of war was a precondition for preventing democratic governance and political pluralism from developing in the country. The problems of social rights and freedoms enshrined in the constitutions, which were diminished for a long time during the state of war, are emphasized. It also reveals the problematic aspects of the hazardous practice of law enforcement during the military regime period. The fourth part of the work compares the exceptional legal regimes of modern times and interwar Lithuania. The aim is to find common points of contact between both periods, as well as distinguishing novelties of the modern times. An attempt is made to find logical interfaces between two periods and it it sought to explain the differences between regulation emergency regimes. A lot of attention is paid to showing how law enforcement practices have changed since the interwar period up to the present time through the theoretical provisions of the Law on Emergency Situations and Law on the State of war.

Regimes During the State of War, Enhanced Protection and the State of Emergency in Interwar Lithuania In the Master's thesis " Regimes During the State of War, Enhanced Protection and the State of Emergency in Interwar Lithuania " the aim is to analyze the types of emergency regimes, that existed in Lithuania during the interwar period. Another aim is to present the consequences these regimes produced. The paper presents the following regimes: state of war and enhanced protection and sets to describe and compare the various regimes during intewar period. Master's thesis has a clear goal to define and grasp various concepts of various states of exception and to point out the interaction between theoretical and practical notions of the state of emergency. The first part of the work presents the historical overview of the interwar period in Lithuania, revealing the political situation and geopolitical circumstances. Leaning upon the works of historians and scientific material, highlighted are the events and reasons for the introduction of states of emergency in the interwar Lithuania. The first part is divided into four sections, which help to systematically and broadly look at the whole set of circumstances, which created the preconditions for emergency law measures to become a phenomenon that accompanied the Republic of Lithuania throughout the interwar period. The second part focuses on states of exception as a category studied by the science of legal theory. Since the various states of emergency is the consequence of various circumstances, the aim is to broaden the theoretical concepts, institutes and attitudes from the perspective of emergency regimes, while simultaneously seeking answers to the question: what is a state of exception? The author, based on the scientific sources legal theory, compares some of the concepts of the state of exception and presents them in a doctrinal sense. The third part gives a detailed overview of the emergency regimes operating during the interwar period in the Republic of Lithuania. Different sources and provisions of different laws are analyzed. It reveals, how the constantly implemented state of war became a huge part of the day to day life, which influenced the whole country's society, legal environment and political situation. The third part also raises the question of whether the permanent status of state of war was a precondition for preventing democratic governance and political pluralism from developing in the country. The problems of social rights and freedoms enshrined in the constitutions, which were diminished for a long time during the state of war, are emphasized. It also reveals the problematic aspects of the hazardous practice of law enforcement during the military regime period. The fourth part of the work compares the exceptional legal regimes of modern times and interwar Lithuania. The aim is to find common points of contact between both periods, as well as distinguishing novelties of the modern times. An attempt is made to find logical interfaces between two periods and it it sought to explain the differences between regulation emergency regimes. A lot of attention is paid to showing how law enforcement practices have changed since the interwar period up to the present time through the theoretical provisions of the Law on Emergency Situations and Law on the State of war.

Regimes During the State of War, Enhanced Protection and the State of Emergency in Interwar Lithuania In the Master's thesis " Regimes During the State of War, Enhanced Protection and the State of Emergency in Interwar Lithuania " the aim is to analyze the types of emergency regimes, that existed in Lithuania during the interwar period. Another aim is to present the consequences these regimes produced. The paper presents the following regimes: state of war and enhanced protection and sets to describe and compare the various regimes during intewar period. Master's thesis has a clear goal to define and grasp various concepts of various states of exception and to point out the interaction between theoretical and practical notions of the state of emergency. The first part of the work presents the historical overview of the interwar period in Lithuania, revealing the political situation and geopolitical circumstances. Leaning upon the works of historians and scientific material, highlighted are the events and reasons for the introduction of states of emergency in the interwar Lithuania. The first part is divided into four sections, which help to systematically and broadly look at the whole set of circumstances, which created the preconditions for emergency law measures to become a phenomenon that accompanied the Republic of Lithuania throughout the interwar period. The second part focuses on states of exception as a category studied by the science of legal theory. Since the various states of emergency is the consequence of various circumstances, the aim is to broaden the theoretical concepts, institutes and attitudes from the perspective of emergency regimes, while simultaneously seeking answers to the question: what is a state of exception? The author, based on the scientific sources legal theory, compares some of the concepts of the state of exception and presents them in a doctrinal sense. The third part gives a detailed overview of the emergency regimes operating during the interwar period in the Republic of Lithuania. Different sources and provisions of different laws are analyzed. It reveals, how the constantly implemented state of war became a huge part of the day to day life, which influenced the whole country's society, legal environment and political situation. The third part also raises the question of whether the permanent status of state of war was a precondition for preventing democratic governance and political pluralism from developing in the country. The problems of social rights and freedoms enshrined in the constitutions, which were diminished for a long time during the state of war, are emphasized. It also reveals the problematic aspects of the hazardous practice of law enforcement during the military regime period. The fourth part of the work compares the exceptional legal regimes of modern times and interwar Lithuania. The aim is to find common points of contact between both periods, as well as distinguishing novelties of the modern times. An attempt is made to find logical interfaces between two periods and it it sought to explain the differences between regulation emergency regimes. A lot of attention is paid to showing how law enforcement practices have changed since the interwar period up to the present time through the theoretical provisions of the Law on Emergency Situations and Law on the State of war.