Search results

: Jaya Mukti is one of the sub-districts in Dumai Timur District East Dumai Urban Village Jaya Mukti is one of urban villages located in the middle of Dumai City with the highest population density among urban villages in Dumai City. To realize JayaMukti Village Mission, Kelurahan is assisted by the performance of the existing Chairman of the RT, and coincides with the respective term of each Chairman of the RT ended in March 2017 then the researcher made a research on how the Head of RT in JayaMukti Kota Dumai by Payaman J. Simanjuntak "(2005: 1) Is a level of achievement of the results of the implementation of certain tasks. "And Prawirosentono in Sinambela (2012: 5) performance is the work that can be achieved by a person or group of people within an organization, in accordance with the authority and responsibility of each, See that the outcomes of the results or the implementation of the task of Chairman of the RT has not been optimal. Research was chosen purposively in JayaMukti Subdistrict, Kecamtan Dumai Timur Kota Dumai with qualitative approach and data collection technique by interview, observation and documentation. Respondents only 16 Head of RT from 23 RT , Key Informant is Lurah Jayamukti.serta Kasi Pemerintahannya.hasil Research is Performance Chairman of RT in Kelurahan JayaMukti from Administration Reporting that maximal routine only reaches 50%, Increase participation of citizen or citizen in Village JayaMukti average 72,50% for , Community empowerment or average citizen of 26.56% and Maintenance of Public Security and Order of the Community Average of 43.75%. To improve the performance of Ketau RT in addition to increasing the capacity of the RT Chairman himself and realizing that the position of Chairman of the RT is a Social , So the consciousness of the consequences, while the community must be educated about the social function as Chairman of the RT while from the Village can make a kind of integrity fact that must be signed by the Head of RT in Kelurahan so there are things that need to be accounted for according to the fact of integrity.

Examines sources of conflict between the Slovaks and the Magyars, including language, political representation, demarcation of local administrative boundaries, and self-government.

Societal issues involving policies and publics are generally understudied in research on ocean-based Negative Emission Technologies (NETs), yet will be crucial if novel techniques are ever to function at scale. Public attitudes are vital for emerging technologies: publics influence political mandates, help determine the degree of uptake by market actors, and are key to realizing broader ambitions for robust decision-making and responsible incentivization. Discourses surrounding ocean NETs will also have fundamental effects on how governance for the techniques emerges, shaping how they are defined as an object of governance, who is assigned the authority to govern, and what instruments are deemed appropriate. This Perspective brings together key insights on the societal dimensions of ocean NETs, drawing on existing work on public acceptability, policy assessment, governance, and discourse. Ocean iron fertilization is the only ocean NET on which there exists considerable social science research thus far, and we show that much evidence points against its social desirability. Taken in conjunction with considerable natural science uncertainties, this leads us to question whether further research is actually necessary in order to rule out ocean iron fertilization as an option. For other ocean NETs, there is a need for further research into social dimensions, yet research on analogous technologies shows that ocean interventions will likely evoke strong risk perceptions, and evidence suggests that the majority of ocean NETs may face a greater public acceptability challenge than terrestrial NETs. Ocean NETs also raise complex challenges around governance, which pose questions well-beyond the remit of the natural sciences and engineering. Using a conceptual exploration of the ways in which different types of discourse may shape emerging ocean NETs governance, we show that the very idea of ocean NETs is likely to set the stage for a whole new range of contested futures.

Societal issues involving policies and publics are generally understudied in research on ocean-based Negative Emission Technologies (NETs), yet will be crucial if novel techniques are ever to function at scale. Public attitudes are vital for emerging technologies: publics influence political mandates, help determine the degree of uptake by market actors, and are key to realizing broader ambitions for robust decision-making and responsible incentivization. Discourses surrounding ocean NETs will also have fundamental effects on how governance for the techniques emerges, shaping how they are defined as an object of governance, who is assigned the authority to govern, and what instruments are deemed appropriate. This Perspective brings together key insights on the societal dimensions of ocean NETs, drawing on existing work on public acceptability, policy assessment, governance, and discourse. Ocean iron fertilization is the only ocean NET on which there exists considerable social science research thus far, and we show that much evidence points against its social desirability. Taken in conjunction with considerable natural science uncertainties, this leads us to question whether further research is actually necessary in order to rule out ocean iron fertilization as an option. For other ocean NETs, there is a need for further research into social dimensions, yet research on analogous technologies shows that ocean interventions will likely evoke strong risk perceptions, and evidence suggests that the majority of ocean NETs may face a greater public acceptability challenge than terrestrial NETs. Ocean NETs also raise complex challenges around governance, which pose questions well-beyond the remit of the natural sciences and engineering. Using a conceptual exploration of the ways in which different types of discourse may shape emerging ocean NETs governance, we show that the very idea of ocean NETs is likely to set the stage for a whole new range of contested futures.