Search results

We investigate whether the bank crisis management framework of the European banking union can effectively bar the detrimental influence of national interests in cross-border bank failures. We find that both the internal governance structure and decision making procedure of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) and the interplay between the SRB and national resolution authorities in the implementation of supranationally devised resolution schemes provide inroads that allow opposing national interests to obstruct supranational resolution. We also show that the Single Resolution Fund (SRG), even after the ratification of the reform of the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) and the introduction of the SRF backstop facility, is inapt to overcome these frictions. We propose a full supranationalization of resolution decision making. This would allow European authorities in charge of bank crisis management to operate autonomously and achieve socially optimal outcomes beyond national borders.

We investigate whether the bank crisis management framework of the European banking union can effectively bar the detrimental influence of national interests in cross-border bank failures. We find that both the internal governance structure and decision making procedure of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) and the interplay between the SRB and national resolution authorities in the implementation of supranationally devised resolution schemes provide inroads that allow opposing national interests to obstruct supranational resolution. We also show that the Single Resolution Fund (SRG), even after the ratification of the reform of the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) and the introduction of the SRF backstop facility, is inapt to overcome these frictions. We propose a full supranationalization of resolution decision making. This would allow European authorities in charge of bank crisis management to operate autonomously and achieve socially optimal outcomes beyond national borders.

"This book offers a thorough overview, analysis and discussion of the liability regimes which apply to financial supervisors and resolution authorities at EU level, at the level of selected individual EU Member States and in major jurisdictions worldwide. It offers a unique and thorough access to a topic that is of great practical and theoretical importance. The book also contains a thorough comparative law evaluation"--

Abstract

900
In bank resolution, swift and effective cooperation of different actors is of essence, particularly in cross-border cases. While the same can be said about cross-border insolvency management generally, the European framework for the recovery and resolution of failing banks and, in particular, the centralisation of resolution powers within the Single Resolution Mechanism stand out as particularly complex – and, at the same time, remains to some extent untested to the present date. Against this backdrop, the present article explores the statutory framework for cooperation between the Single Resolution Board, the European Central Bank in its capacity as supervisory authority within the Single Supervisory Mechanism, National Resolution Authorities and Third Country authorities. It concludes that, while the legal and institutional arrangements governing inter-agency cooperation are generally sound, operationalisation in actual cases might still be exposed to unexpected disruptions, especially in cases where political interests are at stake.

Published also as thesis (Ph.D.) Columbia university, 1927. ; Mode of access: Internet.

Artículo de revista ; The European authority in the field of banking resolution is the Single Resolution Board (SRB), in collaboration with the national resolution authorities. The resolution of a bank involves its restructuring by this Board, through a series of instruments aimed at ensuring the continuity of the institution's critical functions and financial stability in one or several Member States. This article describes the basic characteristics of the Single Banking Resolution Mechanism. Aspects relating to its mission, governance and organisation are first set out. A description that follows of the substantive elements of a resolution plan, namely public interest, critical functions, resolution strategies and instruments, the analysis of a bank's resolvability and the identification of obstacles to resolution. The author also explains the setting of a minimum level of eligible liabilities (MREL) and describes the functioning of the Single Resolution Fund. Lastly, a summary is given of the SRB's activity since it was established in 2015, and the ongoing legislative reforms under the European resolution framework are set out.

Das Institut für Deutsche Sprache ist eines der Gründungsmitglieder der "Europäischen Föderation nationaler Sprachinstitutionen", zu der die Sprachakademien und zentralen Sprachinstitute aus den Staaten der Europäischen Union gehören. Sie wird meist abkürzend E1N1I genannt mit dem Akronym ihres englischen Namens: "European Federation of National Institutions for Language" (Näheres unter ). Auf ihrer Jahreskonferenz in Riga 2007 beschloss die Generalversammlung von EFNIL eine Resolution, die den sprachpolitisch zuständigen Stellen der EU und der Mitgliedsstaaten vorgelegt worden ist. Sie liegt inzwischen in allen 23 offiziellen Sprachen der Union vor. Der Beitrag gibt die deutsche Fassung wieder.