Search results

Рассматривается сущность, основные признаки и психологические особенности высоких гуманитарных технологий, охарактеризованы концепты «мягкой» и «умной» сил и их связь с высокими гуманитарными технологиями ; The article describes the essence, basic features and psychological characteristics of high humanitarian technologies, describes in detail the concepts of «soft» and «smart» power and their relationship with high humanitarian technologies

The paper reviews the monograph "Theory and Methods of Linguistic Analysis of Political Text" (execu-tive editor A.P. Chudinov, Ekaterinburg, 2016). The aim of the book under review is to determine the object, subject, theory and methodology of political linguistics, and its place among the interconnected disciplines. ; В статье представлена рецензия на монографию "Теория и методика лингвистического анализа политического текста", целью которой является определение методологии политической лингвистики и ее статуса в ряду смежных дисциплин.

The course of political science in higher education is often read, to a large extent, as a theoretical course and affects the study of issues and problems of the formation and development of political institutions, processes and technologies. The focus is usually on the history of politics, the state as the central institution of the political system, political parties, political consciousness, culture, political relations, etc. However, it is very important that, when studying a course in political science, listeners understand the current political processes taking place around them. Some of them are well established, democratic processes, such as the electoral process. Others are associated with the impact of modern innovation processes on the political sphere of society. And in this case, political science as a science once again demonstrates its value in an applied format. For a deep understanding of this kind of political processes, additional aggregated information is needed, knowledge that should differ in such characteristics as relevance, novelty, compliance with modern development. In the modern digital era, it is necessary to additionally acquire knowledge about the digital transformation of political institutions, processes and technologies, including types of state policy, the most important of which is social. And it's not just the digital economy. This, first of all, digitalization of public administration (State-web) — Big Date management, blockchain, etc., as well as digitalization of business — the emergence and development of digital enterprises, etc. It is obvious that the use of digital technologies will become possible for the development of predictive political science. This article is largely a translation of German publications by scientists dealing with the development of modern political science education in the countries of the European Union, in particular, in the Federal Republic of Germany. The focus is on the impact of digitalization on the teaching of theoretical and applied political science.

The scientific problem lies in the discrepancy between the self-reflective Western and Eastern traditions of the philosophy of sport and the very real sports process and sports science, and, by and large, the classical understanding of the scope and content of the concept of philosophy as such.
The relevance of the study lies in the need to eliminate or «remove» this discrepancy, which at three levels openly complicates the development of the philosophy of sport: firstly, as a philosophy in the classical sense of the word; secondly, as a scientific philosophy; and thirdly, as a scientific philosophy of sports and sports science, and not existential, irrational, hermeneutic and other ideas and experiences about philosophizing thoughts about something vaguely reminiscent of them.
The purpose of the study is to construct and briefly justify a classification of the scientific philosophy of sports and sports science from the standpoint of classical philosophy and a
dialectical-materialistic worldview, as well as to indicate a short list of its main tasks in the current situation of aggravated military-political confrontation between Russia, East and West.
The methodology and organization of the study are based on a comprehensive historical, philosophical and scientific theoretical and comparative analysis, including general scientific operations of grouping, systematization, abstraction, idealization and logical operations of defining and dividing concepts, induction, deduction, analogy, determining truth, proof and refutation, constructing a hypothesis.
Research results and conclusions. Gradually but steadily growing since the beginning of the 21st century, global changes in the modern socio-political picture of the world are increasingly clearly and rapidly entailing equally significant changes in education and science (including specialized ones). This article presents a system for constructing the philosophy of sport and sports science, which provides a solution to the full range of modern problems of philosophical analysis and scientific research of sport as:
• social phenomenon and institution;
• cultural and civilizational mechanism of social evolution of humanity;
• a mechanism for preserving and improving a person in his inherent parameters of a social and psychophysiological being;
• an outpost for preventing the processes of human deanthropolization.
It is easy to notice that this system of constructing the philosophy of sport and sports science in many aspects and in terms of system-forming factors differs significantly from its predecessors, at the same time serving as the basis for their scientific and philosophical criticism — criticism that substantiates the urgent need for a radical restructuring of the entire edifice of the philosophy of physical culture and sports, based on from the modern socio-political challenges addressed to her.

The paper focuses on structural analysis as a method of political research. The author attempts to demonstrate some features of this method distinguishing it from the American structural functionalism. At the same time, the use of discourse analysis method is explored, as well as the application of structuralist methodologies to the study of the phenomenon of political power. The author comes to the conclusion that using this method to investigate the the current political situation extends the methodological potential of political science as a branch of knowledge. ; Статья посвящена использованию структурного анализа применительно к исследованию политической проблематики. Автор пытается продемонстрировать отличительные характеристики данного метода от американского структурного функционализма. Вместе с тем, в данном исследовании происходит рассмотрение использования метода дискурс-анализа, а также применение структуралистской методологии к исследованию феномена политической власти. Автор приходит к выводам, что использование данного метода в исследовании современной политической ситуации расширяет методологический потенциал политологии как отрасли знания.

Atatürk problemlerin çözümünde daima barış yanlısı olmuştur. Barışı sadece ülkesi için değil, bütün dünya için istemiştir. Bu düşüncesini "Yurtta Barış, Dünya'da Barış" sözüyle ifade etmiştir. Atatürk, Milli Mücadele döneminde de barışın sağlanması için çalışmıştır. Bunu gerçekleştirmenin yolunun da işgalin sona erdirilmesi olduğunu belirtmiştir. Ancak İtilaf devletleri işgalden vazgeçmedikleri için Türk Milleti bağımsızlığını kazanmak amacıyla cephede mücadele etmek zorunda kalmıştır. Atatürk, zafer kazanıldıktan sonra da kalıcı bir barış antlaşmasının gerçekleşmesi için gayret göstermiştir. Bu gayretler sonucu imzalanan Lozan Antlaşması'ndan sonra da barışçı politikasını sürdürmüştür. Başta komşu devletler olmak üzere tüm devletlerle iyi ilişkilerde bulunmuş ve Balkan Paktı ile Sadabat Paktı'nın kurulmasına öncülük etmiştir. Dünyadaki bütün barışçı çalışmaları desteklemiş, savaşları önleme ve silahsızlanmaya yönelik çabaların tamamında yer almıştır. Türkiye'nin dünyada barışı sağlamak amacıyla kurulan Birleşmiş Milletler'e üye olmasına da katkıda bulunmuştur ; Atatürk has always been in favor of peace in solution of problems he encountered. He wanted the peace not only for his country but also for the entire world. He expressed this view as "Peace in home, peace on the world". He also tried to establish a peacefull environment during the National Struggle. He stated that the way to enable this was putting the enemy invasion to the end. But he had to war in order to gain independence for his country because the Allied Nations didn't give up invading it. Atatürk also made efforts to provide a permanent peace agreement following the victory. He sustained his peaceful policies after Lausenne Agreement signed by means of these efforts. He made good contacts with other countries, especially those surrounding Turkey and led to Balcan Agreement and Sadabat Agreement. He supported all peaceful efforts on the world and tried to prevent wars and took part in efforts to enable disarmament. He contributed to Turkey for it to be a member of United Nations founded to provide peace on the world.