Polarizing Political Parties
In: Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning: TfS = Norwegian journal of social research, Volume 45, Issue 2, p. 355-373
ISSN: 1504-291X
202 results
Sort by:
In: Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning: TfS = Norwegian journal of social research, Volume 45, Issue 2, p. 355-373
ISSN: 1504-291X
In: Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning: TfS = Norwegian journal of social research, Volume 45, Issue 2, p. 295-317
ISSN: 1504-291X
In: Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning: TfS = Norwegian journal of social research, Volume 45, Issue 2, p. 245-271
ISSN: 1504-291X
In: Internasjonal politikk, Volume 69, Issue 3, p. 539-543
ISSN: 0020-577X
This thesis deals on integration of ASEAN. The primary objective of this thesis is to find out the potential of ASEAN to be politically and economically integrated like EU, and the kind of difficulties it may face in a mid way. Since EU is a pioneer and benchmark for any integration and ASEAN takes EU as a reference, I choose EU as a base to compare the progress of ASEAN. As for the theoretical aspect, integration theory and its importance in global scenario is discussed. The research sought after the way ahead for ASEAN. This study is based on a comparative analysis of the development of both EU and ASEAN. The information and literature needed for the thesis will be collected from open source, which is easily accessible to all. After analyzing the historical background, present development and future prospect, I think ASEAN is turning out to be the successful regional cooperation. Even though ASEAN took reference from EU in its development, It don´t need to be like EU. Being the cooperation from different group of differently diversified nations, It can pave its own way forward and can lay good precedent for other upcoming regional co-operations. ; M-IR
BASE
In: Norsk statsvitenskapelig tidsskrift, Volume 34, Issue 4, p. 188-206
ISSN: 1504-2936
In: Teologisk tidsskrift, Volume 2, Issue 2, p. 191-194
ISSN: 1893-0271
In: Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning: TfS = Norwegian journal of social research, Volume 45, Issue 2, p. 155-164
ISSN: 1504-291X
In: Nordisk kulturpolitisk tidskrift: The Nordic journal of cultural policy, Volume 17, Issue 1, p. 55-75
ISSN: 2000-8325
In: Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning: TfS = Norwegian journal of social research, Volume 53, Issue 3, p. 374-377
ISSN: 1504-291X
In: Norsk statsvitenskapelig tidsskrift, Volume 25, Issue 1, p. 86-89
ISSN: 1504-2936
In: Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning: TfS = Norwegian journal of social research, Volume 65, Issue 1, p. 1-23
ISSN: 1504-291X
In: Norsk statsvitenskapelig tidsskrift, Volume 31, Issue 3, p. 260-268
ISSN: 1504-2936
In: Teologisk tidsskrift, Volume 5, Issue 2, p. 179-181
ISSN: 1893-0271
In: Internasjonal politikk, Volume 64, p. 367-391
ISSN: 0020-577X
The role of think tanks in American politics has been increasingly subjected to systematic analysis over the last 10-15 years. In this article I review some of this literature, focusing mainly on the questions of what think tanks are, why this phenomenon is so strongly associated with the US, & what influence think tanks have on US policy-making. Think tanks comprise a wide range of organizations, from pure research institutions to the ideologically-based "advocacy think tanks" characterized by their combination of a strong political agenda & aggressive marketing techniques. The American political system has several features that allow think tanks access to the decision-making process, such as a fragmented structure with a weak party system, a central role for the mass media, & an issue-dominated political agenda. There is no good measure of the general influence of think tanks in US politics, but case studies indicate that the central role of the ideologically-based advocacy think tanks may serve to undermine the role of experts in American politics in the long term. References. Adapted from the source document.