Search results

Hausmitteilung


Wir haben eine Fanpage auf Facebook und freuen uns über einen Klick auf "Like".
Bei iTunes sind wir hier zu finden - wir freuen uns über Abos & gute Bewertungen. Vielen Dank für die vielen positiven Stimmen, die uns ein Feature von Apple als "Neu & empfehlenswert eingebracht haben.
Wir suchen nach wie vor einen Jingle (Titelmusik) - gerne bombastisch-ironisch, sowas in dieser Richtung.
"Glimpse" - die App, mit der Ulf seinen Weg entlang der Panke mit Philip geteilt hat - gibt es bei iTunes für iOS und im Google Play Store für Android (no affiliation).


Love Parade

Unglück bei der Loveparade 2010 (Wikipedia)
Staatsanwaltschaft will Loveparade-Strafprozess mit Beschwerde retten (SZ)
Die Loveparade-Ermittlungen - sechs Jahre Totalversagen (Kommentar von Bernd Dörreis, SZ)


Panama Papers

Panama Papers (The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists)
Panama Papers - Die Geheimnisse des schmutzigen Geldes (SZ)
The Panama Papers: Here's What We Know (NYTimes)
How Delaware Thrives as a Corporate Tax Haven (NYTimes)
Medienradio MR068 - Offshore-Leaks




Feedback-Schleife

Affäre um Erdogan-Verse: Staatsanwaltschaft ermittelt gegen Jan Böhmenmann (Spiegel Online)
Justiz ermittelt gegen Jan Böhmenmann (Law Blog / Udo Vetter)
§ 103 StGB - Beleidigung von Organen und Vertretern ausländischer Staaten
Küchenradio KR204 - Bruno Schirra

13 p. ; Un nuevo tipo de periodismo, basado en filtraciones de gran cuantía, ha generado la necesidad de compartir esfuerzos, dando lugar a formas de cooperación periodística en redes globales. Esta es la modalidad que caracteriza a organizaciones como el Consorcio Internacional de Periodistas de Investigación (ICIJ), que tuvo a su cargo la recopilación, análisis y coordinación de la publicación de los documentos de Panamá (Panama Papers). Este trabajo se propone reflexionar sobre esta forma de periodismo en red a nivel global que visibiliza el caso Panama Papers, con sus posibilidades a partir del trabajo en red, como con sus limitaciones asociadas a los intereses y condicionantes intervinientes. Asimismo, el escrito discute el rol e impacto de la participación argentina en esta investigación, especialmente por la controvertida cobertura que recibieron las vinculaciones del propio empleador de los periodistas participantes, el diario La Nación, hasta compañías que comprometen al presidente Mauricio Macri. Los resultados evidencian la tensión entre el derecho a la información y la libertad de empresa, reflejada en una internacionalmente cuestionada cobertura de los medios argentinos asociados a la investigación, que demuestran lo que en el país se conoce como "blindaje mediático". --

The international financial and political crisis named Panama Papers (2016) provided a rather good material for information studies, particularly for digital diplomatics. First, the comments, in some languages, allow to analyze how media and newspapers use the words information, data, document, file and record, each with its own culture: some papers are directly written with the own words of the journalist, others are translations, showing notably the differences between English and French professional and common vocabulary. Second, it was also an opportunity to check the place of email in those cases of disclosure of sensitive data in the "society of information". The point is that the fragility of the digital files themselves (format, preservation) is not the worse for information and records management; the risk is more linked to the fragility of the international network and the ability of search engines to reach these records, wherever they may be stored.

Publication of the so-called "Panama Papers" focused public interest on how certain politicians, celebrities, and other elites may have used elaborate corporate structures and offshore tax havens to conceal their beneficial ownership of companies and obscure their personal assets. Rather than taking the Panama Papers as an indication of the need for more and stricter disclosure and reporting rules, this paper advocates an alternative approach. We need to start by acknowledging that many companies are currently experiencing "disclosure and reporting fatigue", in which the constant demand for "more" and "better" transparency and reporting is having the unintended effect of promoting indifference or evasiveness. The practice of disclosure and reporting is widely perceived as an obligation to be fulfilled and not as an opportunity to add value to a firm. This is confirmed by the findings of an empirical study conducted by the authors of this paper that examines how disclosure rules operate in practice across various jurisdictions. The key takeaway of the study is that—even in jurisdictions that have a robust disclosure regime—the majority of firms engage in "grudging" or "boilerplate" compliance, in which ownership and control structures are not adequately revealed in an accessible way and, perhaps more importantly, the impact of these ownership and control structures on the governance of a company is obscured. In this paper the authors advocate an approach based on the current communication strategy of a minority of firms in their sample—firms that engage in what the authors characterize as "open communication." These firms present information on control structures—and their effect on governance—in a direct, accessible, and highly personalized manner. Such firms seem to recognize the commercial and other strategic benefits to be gained from open communication. The paper explores the implications of such an approach for both business and regulators.