This article examined deception like a game in the ontological, epistemological, existential, ethical, legal, aesthetic aspects. Emphasis gives to the aesthetic aspect: aesthetics needs saving mystery of beauty essence. Aesthetic shown with an example of the game of the actor on the stage, while the everyday life of the people more and more like a game of the actor on the stage. There is shown that any deception - is always a game, any game - is a deception, because deception and the game alienate and mediate reality, because the reality becomes unauthentic understanding of the world.
The article examined the dispute about the ideas between Aristotle and Plato as one of the cause of start of postmodern philosophy. Aristotle identified the idea (eidos) and form, which is cause of equating of the reality of the discourse and immanentization of being and apology of hedonism and the ambition of pleasure. The absence of a dialectical relationship between form and substance in the philosophy of Aristotle, and, in fact, the equation things and its form, that provides the degeneration of the original ideas in the simulacrum. Plato's opinion differed from the opinion of the opinion about the ideas of Aristotle. The idea determines the form of things, but not identical to it. The idea is transcendent, but not immanent of things. Aristotle's philosophy in its historical and philosophical deployment provided absence of truth, but not its being.
This article analyzes the dialectical of relationship of seriousness and responsibility. For this purpose made explicit the relationship of the seriousness and the hierarchy of being, and the seriousness and laughter. The article shows that a serious person responsible dialectically negated a laugh: that to be a serious necessary to release responsibility with help of laughter.
Medicine is the oldest (along with philosophy) science. But the philosophy is the basic method of scientific knowledge. The philosophical category of "bioethics", "morality", "ethics" boldly called interdisciplinary, touching and medical science. This article discusses the above concepts of Michel Foucault in their relationship with medicine.
The article studies the state of the research of the religious preconditions and consolidating factors of democracy. The analysis of the transformation of the social doctrine of the Catholic Church, the main reference points of the present day social doctrine and the place of democracy in this doctrine demonstrates that the church doctrine is not a dogma but a fluid discourse responding to the challenges of modernity. ; Статья содержит анализ современного состояния исследований религиозных предпосылок и факторов консолидации демократии. На примере анализа трансформации социальной доктрины католической церкви, основных положений современной социальной доктрины и места демократии в этой доктрине показано, что церковные доктрины не являются догмой, а представляют собой живой дискурс, отвечающий на вызовы современности.
The article analyzes the process of the movement of the Ukrainian authorities and certain church circles for receiving Tomos (ecclesiastical permission) for the creation of a single Ukrainian Orthodox Church, which has now unfolded. The authors point out the extreme politicization of this process, which concerns, above all, the affairs of the Church and believers. The methodological basis of the research was the recently developed philosophy of schism, which allows one to see the consequences of splits, primarily in the polarization of society. For the analysis, the authors also used the method of textological analysis of the statements of the participants of the marked events. In the course of the study, the authors concluded that the facts and events taking place in connection with the unfolding process of Ukraine's struggle for obtaining Tomos in Ukraine point to the politicization at the present time of not only religion, but also state-confessional and inter-church relations. The materials of the research allow us to conclude that the claims of the Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew to the right to solely extradite Tomos to autocephaly alone are unreasonable, since there is no source under them except for one's own will and the cathedral of the Constantinople Church. And also the authors point out the lack of consensus of other autocephalous Churches that would grant such a right to the Ecumenical Patriarch. ; В статье проанализирован процесс движения украинской власти и определенных церковных кругов за получение Томоса (церковного разрешения) на создание единой Украинской православной церкви, развернувшийся в настоящее время. Авторы указывают на крайнюю заполитизированность данного процесса, касающегося, прежде всего дел Церкви и верующих. Методологической базой исследования стала наметившаяся не так давно философия раскола, позволяющая видеть последствия расколов в первую очередь в поляризации общества. Авторами также был использован метод текстологического анализа высказываний участников обозначенных событий. В ходе исследования сделано заключение о том, что факты и события, происходящие в связи с развернувшимся процессом борьбы Украины за получение Томоса на Украине, указывают на крайнюю политизацию, характерную для настоящего времени, не только религии, но и государственно-конфессиональных, и межцерковных, и внутрицерковных отношений.Материалы исследования позволяют сделать вывод о необоснованности претензий Вселенского патриарха Варфоломея на право единолично выдавать Томос на автокефалию, поскольку под ними нет никакого источника, кроме собственной воли и собора Константинопольской церкви. А также отсутствует и консенсус других автокефальных Церквей, которые бы даровали такое право Вселенскому патриарху.
This article discusses the historical and philosophical forms of the existence of the fundamental onto-epistemological deception, in other words, archaeological exposition genealogy prospects fundamental onto-epistemological deception. The article related the "disintegration" of being and the "deconstruction" of metaphysics with the elimination of transcendentas something that is outside the subject-object relationship. Outside of the subject-object relationship was placed nothing, and being became nothing in next time. There are based on this think make conclusion about the dissolution of human in discourse and breakup of social role from a human. There are briefly shows the history of the relation of text and reality. There are tried to present postmodern philosophy in classical terms, near to the Hegelian. This explication helped define the concept of "simulacrum" through the concept of «thing (ens)" (ontic definition). Simulacrum is thing (ens) that cannot go out of possibility into reality due to the collapse of being, but differs by Difference like thing into unbeing. Such thing (ens) is false in nature, as there is no being (being is the truth). During the presentation there is a comparison of classical and post-modern philosophy.
This article examines the phenomenon of levity through the prism of the dialectic of simple and complex. For this purpose explicated relations of stupidity and levity, levity and wisdom, wisdom and stupidity. Simple shown as something with the maximum of complexity.
The article deals with the features of sociological analysis of religion in Russia during the imperial period of its history. The national sociological tradition of study of religion as a socio-cultural phenomenon and a social institution, which was developed during this period, had its own unique and peculiar appearance and was just begun to revive again in post-Soviet Russia, is sharply different from the tradition that took place in the West. In this context, the appeal to the works of classics of Russian religious, socio-political thought, unfortunately undeservedly forgotten, is a very promising area of modern sociological research.When studying this problem, the author emphasizes the study of the works of representatives of three ideological areas of Russian religious and socio-political thought: conservatism, liberalism and socialism, as well as the peculiarities of the historical development of Russian society and the state and those events that had a significant impact on the formation and development of scientific understanding of religion in Russia. Among such features, the author, in particular, refers to the formation of an "antisystem" (systemic integrity of people who are negative about their homeland, hate their own nation, its values and culture, history, traditional religious, political and social systems) among the Russian intelligentsia, bureaucracy and part of the elite of Russian society, under a certain influence of Westernism, as a consequence of the spiritual schism of the 18th century, which occurred in the educated strata and elite of Russian society.The author of the article analyzing the views of A.I. Herzen, P.L. Lavrov, M.A. Bakunin, P.A. Kropotkin, G.V. Plekhanov, V.I. Lenin, emphasizes the understanding of religious issues by representatives, primarily the socialist camp, who dreamed of carrying out a socialist revolution in Russia and who were extremely negative about religion, religious institutions and the traditional life of society. He notes the fact that the authors mentioned above were more concerned with introducing various ideological stamps into science, as well as using political technologies to discredit in a destructive way for society and the State, this traditionally important sphere of life for any society and an influential social institution. Against this background, a peculiar exception to the rules was the balanced, scientifically based approach to sociological analysis of religion in society developed by P.A. Sorokin, with an emphasis on the study of the integrating role of religion in social stratification. ; Настоящая статья посвящена исследованию особенностей социологического анализа религии в России в имперский период ее истории. Отечественная социологическая традиция изучения религии как социокультурного феномена и социального института, сложившаяся в этот период, имеет свой неповторимый и своеобразный облик. Она к настоящему моменту только начинает возрождаться в постсоветской России, и резко отличается от той традиции, которая имела место на Западе. В этом контексте обращение к трудам классиков русской религиозной, социально-политической мысли, к сожалению, незаслуженно забытых, является очень перспективным направлением современных социологических исследований в данной области.При изучении данной проблемы автор делает акцент на исследовании работ представителей трех идеологических направлений русской религиозной и социально-политической мысли: консерватизма, либерализма и социализма, а также особенностях исторического развития российского общества и государства и тех событиях, которые оказали знаковое влияние на становление и развитие научного осмысления религии в России. К таким особенностям, автор, в частности, относит формирование "антисистемы" (системной целостности людей, негативно относящихся к своей Родине, ненавидящих свою собственную нацию, ее ценности и культуру, историю, традиционные религиозные, политические и социальные системы) в среде русской интеллигенции, бюрократии и части элиты русского общества, под определенным влиянием западничества, как последствие духовного раскола XVIII в., произошедшего в образованных слоях и элите русского общества.Автор статьи делает акцент на осмыслении религиозной проблематики представителями, прежде всего, социалистического лагеря, мечтавшими осуществить социалистическую революцию в России и крайне негативно относившимися к религии, религиозным институтам и традиционным устоям жизнедеятельности общества, анализируя воззрения А.И. Герцена, П.Л. Лаврова, М.А. Бакунина, П.А. Кропоткина, Г.В. Плеханова, В.И. Ленина. Он отмечает тот факт, что упомянутые авторы в большей степени занимались привнесением в науку различных идеологических штампов, а также использованием политтехнологий для дискредитации в деструктивном для общества и государства ключе, этой традиционно значимой для любого общества сферы жизнедеятельности и влиятельного социального института. На этом фоне, своеобразным исключением из правил являлся разработанный П.А. Сорокиным взвешенный, научно обоснованный подход к социологическому анализу религии в обществе, с акцентом на изучение интегрирующей роли религии в социальной стратификации общества.
The article analyzes the process of adaptation of labor migrants from Central Asia in the Republic of Tatarstan. Today, migrants occupy a significant place in modern Russian society. In terms of the number of incoming migrants, Russia occupies one of the leading places in the world. In our study, we studied the process of adaptation of the largest ethnic groups from Central Asia (Kazakhs, Uzbeks, Turkmens, Tajiks, Kirghiz). We were interested in how the process of adaptation of labor migrants from Central Asia takes place, what adaptation strategy they choose in certain circumstances, what problems they face, how they solve them and whose help they turn to in solving them. In addition, it was important to study the readiness of the local population to accept labor migrants arriving in our country. During the study, two main methods were used: expert interviews and population surveys. During the expert interview, experts from various fields were interviewed: researchers, public figures, civil servants of the Republic of Tatarstan. According to the results, it was revealed that the adaptation process is very ambiguous and complex: every year, mainly at the expense of young people, the share of labor migrants increases, whose level of Russian language proficiency is very low, this fact negatively affects adaptation. In addition, the choice of adaptation strategy largely depends on the goals of the incoming migrant. An important role in the success (or, conversely, failure) of adaptation is played by the local host population. A survey was conducted among residents of Tatarstan, in which 400 respondents were interviewed using a questionnaire created in a Google Form. The results showed that the majority of respondents are ready to accept labor migrants and do not see any serious reasons for preventing the latter from entering the territory of Tatarstan. However, some respondents have a negative attitude towards them and are in favor of limiting their stay in the Republic of Tatarstan.
The article examines postmodern as the crisis in the being of human and society in terms of the unity of theory and practice. There is compares postmodern society with the communist and information. There is analysis some variants of development, especially European society in terms of a new source of passionate impulse: new ethno genesis in connection with the increase in the number of migrants, passionate impetus from the US, China, Russia, emergence of a new syncretic religion. The conclusion is that the difference between the post-modern and the freedom not to have an ontological character are only apparent. Postmodern tolerance is a consequence of the absence of ontological foundation of postmodern existence.
The article deals with the features of sociological analysis of religion in Russia during the imperial period of its history. The national sociological tradition of study of religion as a socio-cultural phenomenon and a social institution, which was developed during this period, had its own unique and peculiar appearance and was just begun to revive again in post-Soviet Russia, is sharply different from the tradition that took place in the West. In this context, the appeal to the works of classics of Russian religious, socio-political thought, unfortunately undeservedly forgotten, is a very promising area of modern sociological research. When studying this issue, the author emphasizes the peculiarities of the historical development of Russian society and the state and the events that had a significant impact on the formation and development of scientific understanding of religion in Russia: reforms of Peter I, the elimination of patriarchy, the independence of the Russian Orthodox Church, its transformation into part of the bureaucratic state system created by Peter I, the beginning of a large-scale process of secularization of Russian society, the emergence of Westernism (the direction of the Russian social thought and political ideology focused on values of the Western European culture, which is negative to the idea of originality, an originality, uniqueness of ways of development of the Russian culture, combined with the aspiration of representatives of this trend to impose to the Russian nation of a form of the western culture, social practice and political system, rejecting the system of values and traditional foundations of activity of the Russian society), the imperial nature of the Russian statehood and official imperial ideology. The author analyzes the content of the Uvarov's triad formula, which underlies the official imperial ideology, as well as the discussions that took place between representatives of Slavophilism and Westernism about understanding the historical path and fate of Russia, the historical role of Orthodoxy, the Russian Orthodox Church in the fate of the Russian people, Russian society and the state, as well as the whole world. In his opinion, this problem has remained relevant to the present, including in the framework of a sociological analysis of religion in post-Soviet Russia. ; Настоящая статья посвящена исследованию особенностей социологического анализа религии в России в имперский период ее истории. Отечественная социологическая традиция изучения религии как социокультурного феномена и социального института, сложившаяся в этот период, имеет свой неповторимый и своеобразный облик. Она к настоящему моменту только начинает возрождаться в постсоветской России, и резко отличается от той традиции, которая имела место на Западе. В этом контексте обращение к трудам классиков русской религиозной, социально-политической мысли, к сожалению, незаслуженно забытых, является очень перспективным направлением современных социологических исследований в данной области. При изучении данной проблемы автор делает акцент на особенностях исторического развития российского общества и государства и тех событиях, которые оказали знаковое влияние на становление и развитие научного осмысления религии в России: реформы Петра I, ликвидацию патриаршества, самостоятельности Русской Православной Церкви, превращение ее в часть созданной Петром I бюрократической государственной системы, начало масштабного процесса секуляризации российского общества, возникновении западничества (направления русской общественной мысли и политической идеологии, ориентированного на ценности западноевропейской культуры, отрицательно относящегося к идее самобытности, своеобразия, уникальности путей развития русской культуры, сочетающееся со стремлением представителей этой тенденции навязать русской нации формы западной культуры, социальной практики и политического устройства, отвергая систему ценностей и традиционных устоев жизнедеятельности русского общества), имперский характер российской государственности и официальную имперскую идеологию. Автор статьи анализирует содержание формулы-триады С.С. Уварова, лежащей в основе официальной имперской идеологии, а также дискуссии, которые происходили между представителями славянофильства и западничества по поводу осмысления исторического пути и судьбы России, исторической роли православия, Русской Православной Церкви в судьбе русского народа, российского общества и государства, а также всего мира. Данная проблематика сохранила свою актуальность до настоящего времени, в том числе в рамках социологического анализа религии в постсоветской России.
The article deals with the issues of faith, religion and atheism in opinion journalism by Russian émigré authors of the second half of the 20th century. During the years of the 'Thaw' the problems of 'scientific atheism' and religion gained popularity as discussion points among writers, journalists and men of culture. The social and political situation in the society led to a series of high-profile court cases and the subsequent forced exile of a number of talented authors and journalists. This exodus began the "third wave" of Russian emigration. Our article looks at how the issues of faith, religion and atheism were treated by such diverse authors as A. Solzhenitsyn, V. Maksimov, A. Siniavskii, A. Zinov'ev, V. Aksionov, F. Gorenstein, M. Epstein, and A. Genis.Soviet émigré authors held widely different views on religion and faith, largely due to their commitment to conflicting literary schools and methods. Self-proclaimed proponents of 'spiritual realism' Solzhenitsyn and Maksimov called for a revival of Russian Orthodox faith, while Siniavskii the postmodernist was more attracted by the Russian Schism, sects and the aesthetics of folk belief, and Zinov'ev oxymoronically self-identified as a 'pious infidel'. All of them, however, agreed that both Soviet and Western societies faced a crisis of spirituality at the end of the 20th century. An important role in social and cultural life of emigrant communities belonged to Orthodox press. Issues of faith and morality were widely debated in the years of the perestroika, with lifting the ban on discussing the mistakes and flaws of how the Soviet power treated religion, faith and religious institutions.We conclude that Russian émigré authors, while focusing on religion, faith and atheism in their opinion journalism, tend to begin with analyzing their own religious experience and views on faith. ; Статья посвящена темам веры, религии и атеизма в публицистических работах авторов русского зарубежья второй половины XX в. В СССР в период «оттепели» вопросы религии и научного атеизма стали активно обсуждаться в среде деятелей культуры, писателей, публицистов. Социально-политическая обстановка в стране обусловила череду громких политических дел и последующую высылку, вынужденный выезд из государства ряда талантливых писателей и журналистов, которых стали называть представителями «третьей волны» русской эмиграции. Статья посвящена анализу вопросов веры, религии, атеизма и содержит исследование творчества А. И. Солженицына, В. Е. Максимова, А. Д. Синявского, А. А. Зиновьева, В. П. Аксенова, Ф. Н. Горенштейна, М. Н. Эпштейна, А. А. Гениса.Творческая эмигрантская интеллигенция из Советского Союза по-разному относилась к вере и религии. В значительной мере это объяснялось приверженностью авторов русского зарубежья к разным литературным направлениям и методам. Так, сторонники духовного реализма А. И. Солженицын и В. Е. Максимов ратовали за возрождение православия, постмодернист А. Д. Синявский интересовался расколом христианства и сектантством, эстетикой народной веры, А. А. Зиновьев называл себя «верующим безбожником». Однако и те и другие отмечали духовно-нравственный кризис как советского, так и западного общества на исходе XX в. Важную роль в социальной и культурно-просветительской жизни эмигрантов сыграли православные издания. Особое значение вопросы духовной нравственности получили в эпоху «перестройки», когда свобода слова и печати позволила открыто обсуждать ошибки и упущения советской власти в отношении веры, религии и религиозных институтов.Сделан вывод о том, что авторы русского зарубежья активно обсуждали в своих публицистических произведениях проблемы религии и веры, а также атеистического мировоззрения. В рассмотрении этих вопросов они исходили из самоанализа собственных религиозных взглядов, чувств, переживаний.
