Suchergebnisse

In this article, the work is considered from the standpoint of the theory of property rights. Determined methodological basis of property rights theory. Work is analyzed as an economic phenomenon. Expands the property system of the organization. We present intra-structure contracts. Intercompany property system is specified in respect of employment as a property of the object. We give the concept of labor in terms of property rights.

Paper is devoted to questions of the specification of intrafirm attitudes of the property. The nature of the property of the organization reveals. The mechanism of the specification of the property rights in firm is defined. It is analyzed criteria of efficiency of the specification of the property rights.

In modern linguistics, scientists are increasingly using a prototypical approach to the study of various linguistic phenomena. To study the category of property, we used a functional approach, using the concept of a categorical situation. The categorical situation of property manifestation has six variants of its functioning. A variant of the categorical situation «A concrete inanimate carrier of a property — a predictive property of a static nature» is defined as the prototype as the most consistent with the requirements for the prototype, both meaningfully and formally.

The aim of the study is to evaluate the selected limitation of the right to property. The author is of the opinion that establishing the boundaries of property rights in the law system serves the interests of society and supports the economic, social, politicial and economic well-being.

данная статья определяет механизм управления государственной собственностью ; раскрывает способ образования и основные виды законодательных норм государственной собственности как объекта управления ; рассматривает правовые свойства понятия «государственная собственность» ; а также сущность и значимость управления государственными активами ; подтверждает систематичность управления государственной собственностью ; предоставляет анализ правового режима механизма администрации в области применения прав государственной собственности ; исследует проблему повышения эффективности правовой поддержки динамики административных отношений ; воспринимая государственные активы как объект. ; this article determines the mechanism state property management ; presents a study of formation and the main trends of legislative regulation of state property as an object of management ; examines the legal characteristics of the phenomenon of state property ; as well as the nature and significance of the state assets management ; substantiates the systemic nature of state property management ; presents an analysis of the legal framework of the mechanism of administration in the sphere of exercising state property right ; investigates the problem of increasing the efficiency of legal support of the dynamics of administrative relations ; the latter having state assets as their object.

This article deals with the issues of regulation of property relations of spouses in private international law. The article deals with the conflict issues of marriage, as well as the contractual regime of a property of spouses. The article reveals the content of the Minsk and Chisinau conventions on property relations between spouses. In particular, the conventions say that the property relations between spouses are determined by the legislation of the Contracting Party in whose territory they live together. If the husband lives in one Contracting State and the wife in the other and both have the same nationality, the law of the country of which they are nationals governs their property relations. Attention is paid to bilateral agreements on legal assistance to States in the field of property relations between spouses. For example, such an agreement exists between Russia and Estonia, and it helps to resolve various property issues between spouses. The domestic legislation of different States regulates the issue of determining the regime of matrimonial property in different ways. For example, in the States of the Anglo-Saxon legal system and in most Muslim countries there is only a regime of separate property. On the contrary, in the States of the Romano-German legal system, preference is given to the regime of the common property of spouses, and it is possible to establish a different regime of property relations by agreement of the spouses. According to this principle, and developing family law in Russia.

The article deals with governance system improvement with public property in
the course of innovation activity. The main governance principles with public
property are picked out and innovation tendencies of governance system
improvement with public property are determined.

Despite the fact that China has historically symbolized an "Oriental" pattern of power-property relations, with everything in the country belonging to a sovereign ruler, this has been changing over the last 35 years. Steadily and voluntarily the state is ceding control of property to different social groups. This process entails several problems: legal vacuum engenders rent-oriented behavior of bureaucracy, reforms often turn out to be half-way and cannot solve a problem. Nevertheless, the process seems to be irreversible and likely to foster political and social changes in China in the near future. ; Несмотря на то, что исторически Китай олицетворял собой «восточный» тип отношений между властью и собственностью, при котором всё в стране принадлежит верховному правителю, последние 35 лет это положение вещей стало меняться. Постепенно, шаг за шагом государство добровольно передаёт контроль над собственностью представителям различных групп. Этот процесс сопряжён со множеством проблем: правовой вакуум порождает рентоориентированное поведение части бюрократии, реформы зачастую выходят половинчатыми и не решают поставленной задачи. Тем не менее, процесс уже выглядит необратимым и, скорее всего, в ближайшее время приведёт к ускорению политических и социальных изменений в КНР.

The article deals with the variants of the categorical situation of static property manifestation as the most frequent. We can reveal among them 3 variants: "The concrete animated property bearer — a predicated static property"; "The concrete unanimated property bearer — a predicated static property"; "The abstract property bearer — a predicated static property". Each of them has its own qualities, but the first variant is not typical for English language to a greater extent than for Russian, that can be explained by English linguistic and cultural tradition. The second variant is the most widely distributed in the both languages that is explained by the genre properties of scientific style.

The authors consider the intellectual property rights from two points of view: legal theory and institutional economical theory. Contents of "intellectual property" and "intellectual rights" concepts have been revealed in this paper, and the necessity of their study has been justified not only from the legal point of view, but also from the economic one. The authors emphasize that the institutional economics in general and the economic theory of property rights, in particular, have a great potential in the study both of theoretical and practical aspects related to intellectual rights. According to the authors, it is the institutional approach which will create an effective legislation in this area. ; Авторы статьи рассматривают интеллектуальные права собственности с двух точек зрения: теории права и институциональной экономической теории. В статье раскрыты содержания понятий «интеллектуальная собственность», «интеллектуальные права» и обоснована необходимость их изучения не только с правовой, но и с экономической точки зрения. Авторы подчеркивают, что институциональная экономика в целом и экономическая теория прав собственности, в частности, обладают огромным потенциалом в изучении как теоретических, так и практических аспектов интеллектуальных прав. По их мнению, именно институциональный подход позволит создать эффективное законодательство в данной области.

The end of the 20th — the beginning of the 21st century became a new milestone in the development of civilization, called the digital age. Today we can define its main characteristics: the spread of computers, smartphones, and other devices; the development of the Internet; the formation of new sectors of the economy, including the video game industry. At the time of the formation of the gaming industry, there were no problems regarding the virtual ownership of digital objects by players. This is due to the low quality of games, the lack of the ability to use the Internet, and the functional limitations of games. However, with the increase in the number of games, their quality, the emergence of competition for each active user, the problem of user rights to digital objects in in-game universes has become a reality. The problem of virtual property is becoming more acute due to the lack of legislative regulation of this institution. Game creators force players to accept illegal terms in license agreements. Judicial practice of this issue also shows the lack of understanding among judges of the essence of legal relations that develop between gamers and game creators. In this article, we will consider what is MMORPG. Research the question of the legality of some parts license agreements. Try to answer the main questions: is there a player's virtual property in the MMORPG, and if so, how is it protected, or how should it be protected? ; Период конца XX— начала XXI в. стал новой вехой развития цивилизации, получившей название цифровая эпоха. Уже сегодня можно выделить ее основные характеристики: повсеместное распространение компьютеров, смартфонов, иных устройств; развитие интернета; возникновение новых секторов экономики, в том числе индустрии видеоигр. Изначально, на моменте формирования данной индустрии, проблем, касающихся виртуальной собственности игроков на цифровые объекты, не возникало. В большей мере это связано с низким качеством игр, отсутствием возможности использовать информационно-телекоммуникационные ...

The article examines the key legal problems in connection with the formation and operation of endowment funds (endowment funds). The author takes as a basis two main theses related to the scientific heritage and personality of Professor of Moscow University Sergey Mikhailovich Korneev - the real nature of the right of operational management and the ethical significance of legal activity. The discussion in the scientific literature about the legal regime of the endowment fund property, as well as the purposes of spending the funds of these organizations, paid services of non-profit organizations has not subsided for several years. The author makes an attempt to talk about possible ways to resolve these debatable issues, based on the provisions of the current legislation. The subject of the author's attention is endowment funds as a venture investment tool. Two ways of forming endowment funds are considered in detail - within the framework of an existing non-profit organization and by creating a specialized non-profit organization - a fund. Separately, the issue of restrictions that are introduced by the legislator for this type of non-profit organizations is considered. As an illustrative example, the article analyzes endowment funds operating in the educational sector.

The article considers the Russian civilization as a socio-cultural community that includes different civilizational formations, the fact that determines its heterogeneous nature. An indicator of the heterogeneity of a society is its social structure, with civilisational rifts present - such an opposition of individual structural elements that has a civilizational character. In modern Russia, three civilizational rifts can be recorded. The first of them is based on the existence in the country of different levels of technical and technological development and, accordingly, of the nature and content of laborur of the population. The second rift is due to the material differentiation of the society: from the standard of living (on the threshold and beyond the poverty threshold) to the possession of multibillion fortunes, that leads to a deep difference in the quality of life of the population, that is an attributive feature of various civilizations. The third rift is related to the historically uneven development of the regions. Along with the regions that have entered or are already at the informational stage of development (they are in minority), most of the regions are at the industrial stage, and in some regions, a pre-industrial agrarian society with stable traditional values ​​still prevails. Accordingly, informational, industrial and traditional subcivilizations coexist in the vastness of Russia. Property relations are considered among the significant factors of civilizational development. Property relations are first of all economic and juridical (legal) relations. Property as a social relation carries the historically stipulated content of the moral norms, justice, individual and social benefit. Property is embodied not only in legal forms, but also in customs, cultural patterns, habits, types of thinking and behavioral models. In Russia, the property right of an individual has always been oriented towards "internal justice", correlated in the public and individual consciousness with the prevailing ideas of the proper. Whereas in Western civilization there has been entrenched the priority of public relations based on the protected by law private interest of an individual. The reorientation of property relations in Russia to the Western model, including in the memory of our contemporaries, has not been a success due to the traditionally strong etacratic influences, the dominance of the "power-property" relationship.