Search results

The article concentrates on the most essential elements of a social science as research, whereby research is strictly interpreted as the verification of a theory in a particular field but neither as "theorie sans terrain" nor "terrain sans theorie". Yet even if this particular employment in the field of social science is explicitly conceived of as privileging the logic of discovery and the strictures of proof in opposite to all preconstructed themes, theories and traditions of different disciplines, it cannot simply be reduced to the standpoint of pure logic. Engagement for social science as reflexive research means to further its practical, political acceptance by using the results obtained from research, means fighting for her autonomisation in terms of contributing to the creation of appropriate forms of sociability for its activities and reception (such as the formation of a reading public, discussion forums, effective tools with which to combat social barriers to the attainment of knowledge, etc.). ; The article concentrates on the most essential elements of a social science as research, whereby research is strictly interpreted as the verification of a theory in a particular field but neither as "theorie sans terrain" nor "terrain sans theorie". Yet even if this particular employment in the field of social science is explicitly conceived of as privileging the logic of discovery and the strictures of proof in opposite to all preconstructed themes, theories and traditions of different disciplines, it cannot simply be reduced to the standpoint of pure logic. Engagement for social science as reflexive research means to further its practical, political acceptance by using the results obtained from research, means fighting for her autonomisation in terms of contributing to the creation of appropriate forms of sociability for its activities and reception (such as the formation of a reading public, discussion forums, effective tools with which to combat social barriers to the attainment of knowledge, etc.).

Die Erörterung der Themenfrage wird mit der Vorausantwort: 'ja selbstverständlich nein' eröffnet. Dieser Widerspruch, der sich in der Antwort zeigt, weist auf das zu klärende Problem hin, ob es ein Widerspruch ist, sich der ganzen Wirklichkeit des Menschen als Gesellschaftswesen nur mit naturwissenschaftlichen oder sozial- und geisteswissenschaftlichen Erkenntnismethoden bemächtigen zu wollen. Verläßt man die Ebene der Klassifizierung von Wissenschaften, geht man also nicht davon aus, daß es sich um inkompatible Sichtweisen der Wirklichkeit handelt, so wird sehr schnell deutlich, daß die Verfahren der Erkenntnisgewinnung und Wissenssicherung Unterschiede aber auch viele Gemeinsamkeiten aufweisen. Letztendlich gibt es einen Schnittpunkt, an der sich alle Wissenschaft vereinigt, nämlich am Menschen, der zu wissen sucht. (NG)