Search results

This article is based on a qualitative analysis of in-depth interviews with women and men suffering from fertility problems. It analyses the negotiations between partners confronted with the diagnosis of infertility and seeking the best solution. The analysis examined how men and women define their roles in the treatment of infertility, how they perceive their partners' coping and involvement, and confl icting and controversial topics and situations. Data suggest that the burden of infertility is unequal. While treatment involves a woman fully in the physical and the psychological sense, the involvement of the man and potential father in the treatment process is reduced to his provision of genetic material on demand. The research revealed two factors that infl uence and separate the experiences of men and women: the different time/age frame of the reproductive experience and the physical aspect of infertility and reproduction. Both factors are anchored in the praxis of assisted reproduction. The treatment process is administered in a way that, instead of reshaping or challenging traditional defi nitions of parenthood or gender roles, confi rms the status quo.

Obálka -- Obsah -- Úvodní slovo a poděkování -- 1. Kdo byl Josef Vavroušek -- 2. Systémový inženýr a vizionář v českém prostředí -- 3. J. Vavroušek a "rada moudrých" světa jeho doby: K. Boulding, B. Ward a Amartya Sen -- 4. Slabiny modelu všeobecné tržní rovnováhy v epoše antropocénu -- 5. Eudaimonia a štěstí. Finalita ekonomie, úděl a poslání člověka na Zemi -- 6. Cena Josefa Vavrouška očima mladých účastníků soutěže -- 6.1 Ohlas ceny mezi studenty Univerzity Karlovy -- 6.2 Příspěvky moravské environmentální a rozvojové školy -- 7. Epilog jako naděje ekologické konverze -- Přílohy (Jiří Kameníček) -- A. Faksimile "Zakládací listiny" studentské soutěže o Cenu Josefa Vavrouška -- B. Seznam přihlášených a oceněných studentských prací v letech 1996-2015 -- C. Fotografická příloha -- Literatura.

This article aimed to describe the socio-political conditions after the Bongaya Treaty of 1667. This study employed the historical research method (library research). The researcher applied several approaches, namely the historical approach, religious approach, anthropological approach, and sociological approach. The Makassar War is a momentum for change from all aspects, not only changes from the political aspect but also the social, cultural and economic aspects that greatly tormented the people of Gowa. As a King, Sultan Hasanudin was responsible for the fate of the royal people of Gowa, which was getting sad. Sultan Hasanudin had to consider this even though he wanted to continue to fight. Sultan Hasanudin really understood the suffering of the people of the Kingdom of Gowa. Due to these considerations, the war lasted approximately four years, starting from 1666-1669 and ending with the Bungaya Treaty, which consisted of 30 articles. The treaty affected all aspects of Gowa community life, not only in terms of political factors but also the existence of Muslims. Since then, the power and influence of the Netherlands in East Indonesia began to be embedded towards serious colonialism. Sultan Hasanuddin, who dashed to defend his country until the last second has controlled the Kingdom of Gowa for 16 years; namely 1653-1669 and died in Gowa on June 12, 1670.