Search results

Introduction : recovering sociological jurisprudence -- The nature of legal expertise -- The jurist's role -- Why jurisprudence is not legal philosophy -- Sociology in juristic practice -- Transnational challenges to juristic thought -- Why lawyers need a theory of legal pluralism -- A concept of law for global legal pluralism -- The nature of transnational law -- Transnational legal authority -- A transnational concept of crime -- Legal values in sociological perspective -- Culture as a juristic issue -- Can sociology clarify legal values? -- Human rights and dignity : a Durkheimian perspective -- Legal instrumentalism and popular values -- Conclusion : horizons of sociological jurisprudence.

AbstractAs an affected COVID-19 pandemic country, Indonesia took policy options through Social Restrictions on Large-Scale (PSBB), supported by six legal documents from Government Regulation in Lieu-of-The Law, Government Regulations, to Presidential Decrees. This socio-legal research aims to analyze the COVID-19 countermeasure policy through Roscoe Pound's sociological jurisprudence. Base on empirical data from March to December 2020, the results showed that the policy to overcome COVID-19 is supported by six legal documents when examined through analysis of the hierarchy of norms, clarity of the purpose and usefulness very contradictory to the purpose of the deployment restrictions of COVID-19 itself. Referring to sociological jurisprudence, the COVID-19 policies should be based on four essential elements adjusted to public requirements so that the implementation of the policies can perform effectively. AbstrakSebagai negara yang terdampak pandemic Covid-19, Indonesia mengambil opsi kebijakan melalui Pembatasan Sosial Berskala Besar yang ditopang oleh enam produk hukum mulai Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang, Peraturan Pemerintah, sampai dengan Keputusan Presiden. Penelitian sosio-legal ini bertujuan menganalisis kebijakan penanganan COVID-19 melalui penggunaan teori sociological jurisprudence Roscoe Pound. Berdasarkan data penelitian dari Maret sampai dengan Desember tahun 2020, hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa kebijakan penanganan COVID-19 yang didukung oleh enam produk hukum apabila dikaji secara hierarki norma, kejelasan tujuan, dan kemanfaatan ternyata kontradiktif dengan tujuan membatasi ruang gerak sebaran virus COVID-19 itu sendiri. Selanjutnya mendalilkan kepada aliran sociological jurisprudence maka kebijakan penanganan COVID-19 seyogyanya disandarkan kepada empat poin mendasar yang disesuaikan dengan kebutuhan publik sehingga implemenetasi kebijakan penanganan COVID-10 dapat berjalan dengan efektif.

A collection of brand new and revised essays from eminent scholar of public law, Martin Loughlin, that systematises his work on political jurisprudence - a school of thought that contends the key to understanding the nature of legal order lies in how political authority is constituted