Search results

Intro -- The Sounds of Science: Orchestrating Stewardship in the Seafood Industry -- Copyright -- Dedication -- Contents -- About the author -- Preface -- Soundtracks -- Sidetracks -- Acknowledgments -- Part I A science of hope -- Chapter 1 My background -- 1 Old guy, gold watch, and new potatoes -- 2 The Anthropocene-Are we stuck here and is it all bad? -- Humans and ecosystems -- Inequity, turbulence and power -- The role of science -- 3 From subsistence, users and local impacts to global actors on an interconnected planet -- Food is survival -- The global expansion of the former Soviet Union -- 4 The emergence, growth, and impacts of global corporations -- Corporate family history -- Corporations in the Anthropocene -- A changing business logic -- Scientists as change makers -- 5 Could (and should) scientists try to create a better world? -- My scientific starting points -- Inspired by a grandfather and the natural world -- References -- Chapter 2 The keystone species concept -- 1 A small experiment that gave rise to a big scientific idea -- 2 Can a scientific idea be applied beyond its original discipline? -- Expanding on the keystone species concept -- Tedious data collection -- Inspiration from a Chilean sculptor -- Exciting results -- 3 How monitoring influences human behavior -- Pumas in South America -- Inspiration from a Chilean painter -- Uncovering the unknown -- 4 How rules govern expectations and motivate compliance -- Secrets and taxes -- A detour to career day at school -- Trust and sanctioning -- Describing power -- A seafood industry crisis -- 5 Defining the scientific method -- The importance of experimentation -- Why should companies speak with scientists? -- Finding money -- 6 Would a big experiment necessarily represent a bad idea? -- References -- Chapter 3 Evolution of cooperation.

Governance of marine resources is increasingly characterized by integrated, cross sectoral and ecosystem based approaches. Such approaches require that existing governing bodies have an ability to adapt to ecosystem dynamics, while also providing transparent and legitimate outcomes. Here, we investigate how the Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission (HELCOM), the international governing body for the Baltic Sea, could improve its prospects for working with the ecosystem approach, drawing from the literature on adaptive governance. We construct an ideal type of adaptive governance to which we compare the way in which HELCOM is operating and relate these dynamics to two other international marine environment governance organizations, the Coral Triangle Initiative on Coral Reefs, Fisheries and Food Security (CTI-CFF) and the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR). We conclude that HELCOM deviates from an ideal type of adaptive governance in several ways but also that the other two case studies provide empirical support for potential ways in which HELCOM could improve its adaptive capacity. Key aspects where HELCOM could improve include increasing stakeholder participation – both in information sharing and decision making. Further, HELCOM need to develop evaluation mechanisms, secure compliance to improve adaptive capacity and organizational effectiveness, which entails the development of structures for conflict resolution. Finally, HELCOM need to increase communication and harmonization between different levels of authority.

Corporations are perceived as increasingly powerful and critically important to ensuring that irreversible climatological or ecological tipping points on Earth are not crossed. Environmental impacts of corporate activities include pollution of soils, freshwater and the ocean, depletion of ecosystems and species, unsustainable use of resources, changes to air quality, and alteration of the global climate. Negative social impacts include unacceptable working conditions, erosion of traditional practices, and increased inequalities. Multiple formal and informal mechanisms have been developed, and innovative examples of corporate biosphere stewardship have resulted in progress. However, the biosphere crisis underscores that such efforts have been insufficient and that transformative change is urgently needed. We provide suggestions for aligning corporate activities with the biosphere and argue that such corporate biosphere stewardship requires more ambitious approaches taken by corporations, combined with new and formalized public governance approaches by governments.

Non-state actors (NSAs) have proliferated in number and are increasingly acknowledged to matter for global governance of natural resources. This has generated considerable scholarly interest, but there is surprisingly little systematic knowledge about patterns and trends of NSA participation in global fisheries institutions. This article addresses this gap by studying NSA populations, considering more than 500 actors attending commission meetings, in the five tuna Regional Fisheries Management Organizations (tuna RFMOs) between 2004 and 2011. It constructs a theoretical framework drawing on previous insights from population ecology and global governance literature. The articles finds that multiple NSAs participate in tuna RFMOs, but there is no general trend towards increasing proportions of NSAs compared to state participants. Representational diversity was found to be relatively limited, as NSA participants were predominately representing industry interests and from high income countries. Volatility of NSAs varied across RFMOs, but it was clear that industry representatives were frequently repeat participants, while civil society organizations (CSOs) participated only in occasional meetings. Finally, industry representatives were found to participate as part of member state delegations, while CSOs generally participated as observers. The article discusses the implications of the variation in NSA populations across RFMOs, and over time, and in relation to important concerns in the broader scholarly debates on access, influence, representation, and effectiveness in global environmental governance.