The enlargement of the European Union in 2004 brought many changes with the increase in international trade being one of them. This change had to be reflected in tax legislation of new member states, including the Czech Republic. This article provides a brief summary of the most important impacts of the European Union's legislation in the field of indirect taxation and especially excise duties on the laws of the Czech Republic. I will also deal with procedural issues in the approval of new legislative proposals in this field within the European Union. ; The enlargement of the European Union in 2004 brought many changes with the increase in international trade being one of them. This change had to be reflected in tax legislation of new member states, including the Czech Republic. This article provides a brief summary of the most important impacts of the European Union's legislation in the field of indirect taxation and especially excise duties on the laws of the Czech Republic. I will also deal with procedural issues in the approval of new legislative proposals in this field within the European Union.
The hereby submitted article deals with the Financial Arbiter (Ombudsman) and the payment systems regulation in the Czech Republic. The article focuses mainly on the proceeding before the Czech Financial Arbiter. However, the author also deals with the Financial Ombudsmen in Europe, especially those who are the members of FIN-NET (the Cross-Border Out-of-Court Complaints Network for Financial Services). The legal regulation this work describes covers up (between others) the Payment Systems Act and the Act on the Financial Arbiter, both effective from 1 January 2003. These acts were adopted by the Czech Parliament under the harmonization of the Czech law with the European Community law standards, e.g. with the European Community Directive No. 97/5/EC, on cross-boarder transfers, which requires the possibility for consumers to settle disputes in an efficient and appropriate manner with transfer institutions through out-of-court procedures. ; Šiame straipsnyje autorė nagrinėja finansinio arbitro (ombudsmeno) ir mokėjimo sistemų reglamentavimo raidą Čekijos Respublikoje. Straipsnyje daugiausia dėmesio kreipiama proceso, kuris vyksta prieš prasidedant Čekijos finansų ombudsmenui, analizei. Autorė taip pat gretina finansinio ombudsmeno procesą su panašiais procesais Europoje, ypač - tų arbitrų, kurie yra FIN-NET (Tarpvalstybinio pobūdžio finansinių paslaugų teikiamų ne ginčo tvarka tinklo) nariai. Siame darbe teisiškai nagrinėjami mokėjimų sistemos bei finansų arbitrų aktai, įsigalioję nuo 2003 m. sausio 1 d., priimti Čekijos Parlamente, siekiant suderinti Čekijos Respublikos ir Europos Sąjungos teisės standartus. Kaip pavyzdys, nagrinėjama Europos Sąjungos direktyva Nr. 97/5/EC dėl tarptautinių pavedimų, reikalaujanti suteikti vartotojams galimybę naudotis neteisinėmis procedūromis ginčuose su pavedimus atlikusių institucijų darbuotojais.
The hereby submitted article deals with the Financial Arbiter (Ombudsman) and the payment systems regulation in the Czech Republic. The article focuses mainly on the proceeding before the Czech Financial Arbiter. However, the author also deals with the Financial Ombudsmen in Europe, especially those who are the members of FIN-NET (the Cross-Border Out-of-Court Complaints Network for Financial Services). The legal regulation this work describes covers up (between others) the Payment Systems Act and the Act on the Financial Arbiter, both effective from 1 January 2003. These acts were adopted by the Czech Parliament under the harmonization of the Czech law with the European Community law standards, e.g. with the European Community Directive No. 97/5/EC, on cross-boarder transfers, which requires the possibility for consumers to settle disputes in an efficient and appropriate manner with transfer institutions through out-of-court procedures.
The hereby submitted article deals with the Financial Arbiter (Ombudsman) and the payment systems regulation in the Czech Republic. The article focuses mainly on the proceeding before the Czech Financial Arbiter. However, the author also deals with the Financial Ombudsmen in Europe, especially those who are the members of FIN-NET (the Cross-Border Out-of-Court Complaints Network for Financial Services). The legal regulation this work describes covers up (between others) the Payment Systems Act and the Act on the Financial Arbiter, both effective from 1 January 2003. These acts were adopted by the Czech Parliament under the harmonization of the Czech law with the European Community law standards, e.g. with the European Community Directive No. 97/5/EC, on cross-boarder transfers, which requires the possibility for consumers to settle disputes in an efficient and appropriate manner with transfer institutions through out-of-court procedures.
Changing conditions within international trade as well as the implementation of the facilitation and security paradigm have signifi cantly impacted the structure of customs law. Both the SAFE Framework as well as the Trade Facilitation Agreement had indicated the need to maintain a balance between regulations introducing simplifi cations and those ensuring safety and security. One example of such a solution is the institution of the authorised economic operator (AEO), which grants those entities opportunities to take advantage of a number of simplifi cations, such as the fi ling of the simplifi ed customs declaration, making entries in a registry, or performing self-assessments, but, at the same time, maintains the requirement of safety and security (through a detailed audit of the enterprise before AEO certification). However, by allowing authorised economic operators to perform selfassessment in respect of goods that have entered into the customs territory of the European Union and are to be released for trade, EU legislators have created signifi cant challenges concerning the realm of safety and security, especially concerning the institution that is the most important within that area – that of customs controls. Despite all this, its importance to safety and security remains distinctive and may be seen in the emergence of new types of customs controls which concern only this particular sphere. ; Mirosława Laszuk - m.laszuk@pb.edu.pl ; Dana Šramková - sramkova.dana@seznam.cz ; Mirosława Laszuk - is a Ph.D., a D.Sc. and an Assistant Professor at the Department of Management, Economics and Finance, Faculty of Engineering Management, Bialystok University of Technology, Poland. ; Dana Šramková - is an MBA, an assistant professor at the Faculty of Law, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic, a member of the Legislative Council of the Czech Government, Commission on Financial Law and the Remonstrance Commission of the Czech Minister of Finance for customs area. ; Mirosława Laszuk - Bialystok University of Technology, Poland ; Dana Šramková - Masaryk University, Czech Republic ; Behar A., Venables A. J., Transport Costs and International Trade, (in:) A. de Palma, R. Lindsey, E. Quinet, R. Vickerman (eds), Handbook of Transport Economics, Northampton 2011. ; Czermińska M., Strategiczne działania usprawniające i zwiększające bezpieczeństwo w transgranicznym ruchu towarowym w Unii Europejskiej – elektroniczny system celny, "Studia i Prace Wydziału Nauk Ekonomicznych i Zarządzania" 2015, no. 4. ; Czyżowcz W., Gafrikova V., Bezpieczeństwo ekonomiczne i ryzyko celne w przedsiębiorstwie działającym na międzynarodowym rynku towarowym, (in:) S. Wojciechowska-Filipek, J. Klepacki and A. Jackiewicz (eds) Przedsiębiorczość i zarządzanie w rozwoju ekonomicznym, "Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie" 2017, Volume XVIII, no. 9, part II. ; Danet M., A framework of standards to secure and facilitate global trade, https://www.porttechnology.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/PT25–15.pdf. ; Gellert L., Th e entry summary declaration in the context of risk management, "Customs Scientific Journal" 2014, vol. 4, nо. 2. ; Głodowska A., Liberalizacja handlu towarami przemysłowymi na forum wielostronnym GATT/WTO. Implikacje dla Polski, (in:) S. Wydymus, A. Hajdukiewicz (eds.) Liberalizacja handlu a protekcjonizm : korzyści i zagrożenia dla wymiany handlowej Polski, Warsaw 2015. ; Gwardzińska E., Świadectwo AEO jako gwarant bezpieczeństwa usług celnych w międzynarodowym łańcuchu dostaw, (in:) K. Pieniak-Lendzion, T. Nowogródzka (eds.), Siedlce 2014. ; Gwardzińska E., Laszuk M., Masłowska M., Michalski R., Prawo celne, Warsaw 2017. ; http://www.wcoomd.org/en/topics/facilitation/instrument-and-tools/tools/safe_package.aspx. ; https://www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/prog/csa-pad/menu-eng.html. ; Kurowski L., Ruśkowski E., Sochacka-Krysiak H., Kontrola finansowa w sektorze publicznym, Warsaw 2000. ; Lasiński-Sulecki K., Rudyk T., Śpiewak M., Tytuł III. Przepisy stosowane wobec towarów wprowadzonych na obszar celny Wspólnoty do czasu otrzymania przeznaczenia celnego, (in:) W. Morawski (ed.), Wspólnotowy Kodeks Celny. Komentarz, Warsaw 2007. ; Laszuk M., Kontrola oparta na analizie ryzyka – wybrane problemy, "Monitor Prawa Celnego i Podatkowego" 2015, no. 5. ; Laszuk M., Uwarunkowania kontroli celnej w multicentrycznym systemie prawa, Warsaw 2019. ; Liu J., Tan Y., Hulstijn J., IT Enabled Risk Management for Taxation and Customs: Th e Case of AEO Assessment in the Netherlands, (in:) M. A. Wimmer, H. J. Scholl, M. Janssen, R. Traunmuller (eds), Electronic Government 8th International Conference, EGOV 2009. ; Messerlin P. A., Zarrouk J., Trade facilitation: Technical regulations and customs procedures, "World Economy" 2000, vol. 23, no. 4. ; Portugal-Perez A., Wilson J. S., Why trade facilitation matters to Africa, "World Trade Review" 2009, vol. 8, no. 3. ; Wilson J., Mann C. and Otsuki T., Trade Facilitation and Economic Development: Measuring the Impact, Th e World Bank, Washington 2003. ; Wolff gang H. M., Dallimore C., Th e World Customs Organization and its role in the system of world trade: an overview, "European Yearbook of International Economic Law" 2012, vol. 3. ; WTO, Trade Facilitation Agreement (TFA), https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/tradfa_e/tradfa_e.htm. ; Zysk W., Umowa Trade Facilitation Agrement (TFA) szansą rozwoju eksportu produktów fair trade, "Studia i Prace WNEIZ" 2018, no. 53. ; 26 ; 5 ; 9 ; 21