The following links lead to the full text from the respective local libraries:
Alternatively, you can try to access the desired document yourself via your local library catalog.
If you have access problems, please contact us.
30 results
Sort by:
In the controversy over the reporting of the Falklands conflict, criticism focused on the media's use of armchair strategists to interpret and speculate about operations in the South Atlantic. Valerie Adams sets that media commentary in an historical perspective and examines its actual content to see whether the criticism was justified and whether the material actually helped to inform the public about the actions undertaken on their behalf. The issues raised in wartime by the relationship between the media, the government and the public in a democracy are explored: the Falklands' problems appear insignificant set against potential future difficulties
In: The Media and the Falklands Campaign, p. 111-125
In: The Media and the Falklands Campaign, p. 79-97
In: The Media and the Falklands Campaign, p. 126-140
In: The Media and the Falklands Campaign, p. 174-197
In: The Media and the Falklands Campaign, p. 143-156
In: The Media and the Falklands Campaign, p. 65-78
In: The Media and the Falklands Campaign, p. 44-62
In: The Media and the Falklands Campaign, p. 157-173
In: The Media and the Falklands Campaign, p. 98-110
In: Journal of the Royal United Services Institute for Defence Studies, Volume 130, Issue 4, p. 15-19
ISSN: 1744-0378