Search results

The article analyzes the main social and domestic problems and difficulties faced by women who stayed in their occupied hometown of Melitopol during the aggressive war. It is established that the main problems of Ukrainian women in the occupied city include the closure of all branches of Ukrainian banks, fraudulent schemes with cash withdrawals and shortages of medicines, the impossibility of delivering humanitarian aid from the territory controlled by Ukraine, complaints about the quality and high cost of Russian medicines. It was found that there are also problems with housing services, including: lack of gas supply; unstable water and electricity supply; violation of property rights to property and real estate; confiscation of private housing. It was found that in the cultural and educational sphere, the occupation authorities of the city banned both the state language and the languages of national communities by forcing schools and kindergartens to switch to Russian and Russian programs. The Russians have turned medical facilities into military hospitals, with 90% of hospitals providing care exclusively to wounded occupants. All of this causes negative psychological experiences, feelings of loss or uncertainty, social insecurity, difficulties in realizing social roles and transforming the system of values of personal relationships. It is argued that all these factors give rise to disbelief in victory and a peaceful future, uncertainty about the liberation of the occupied city, a sense of powerlessness, and a lack of communication with family, like-minded people, and friends.

Today, Russian imperialism is undergoing a new phase of its transformation, moving from covert interference in the internal affairs of sovereign states to open territorial expansion. Its primary task is plans to seize the sovereign state of Ukraine through military aggression, forced inoculation of its own model of the world order and return to the space of a single "Russian world". The former post-Soviet Baltic republics, Belarus, Moldova, Georgia are considered as the next territories for integration into the imperial space of Russia. And this is a war not only and not so much for territories, but for ideas, a worldview that will dominate them. The main features of imperialism as an ideology and policy are an irrational desire for military expansion and absolute security, an unobsessed regime with a "center-periphery" subordination relationship, a patronage-client scheme, and the "privatization" of state functions by the ruling elite, turning them into a source of private profits. A distinctive feature of Russian imperialism is that it carries out not only territorial expansion, but above all ideological and ideological expansion, instilling its ideological picture of the world on the conquered peoples. The Russian imperial ideology has been formed over the centuries and is based on such mental traits as: superiority, dominance, psychological inclination towards permissiveness and robbery, servile submission to power in various forms, abnormal patience, religious fanaticism and more. These features of mentality became the basis of the imperial ideology of state building as a system of views, ideas and worldview of Russians. Russian imperialism (rashism) is a syncretism of Russian Nazism, Orthodoxy and psychotraumatic nostalgia for the USSR, which has turned into an imperial identity.

The article is devoted to the analysis of the effective mechanisms and positive experience of the Bohdan Khmelnіtsky Melitopol State Pedagogical University in increasing the productivity of educational, scientific and cultural support of social processes by means of integration of participants in the educational process, teachers and students in the development of the social movement, popularization of the values of the Ukrainian people, strengthening of the national idea and statehood. The means and mechanisms of social cohesion of the community in the conditions of war are considered. It was established that the concept of social cohesion today represents a complex system of practical actions for stable development, improving the quality of life of all layers of society, preventing risks of social alienation with the aim of creating social well-being, harmonious and stable social relations as a component of socio-economic progress. The need for intersubjective practices in the educational space to create relationships of public trust, trust in social institutions for the education of active citizenship, the basis of which is trust in society and its social institutions, as a relevant link in the development of the European practice of intercultural dialogue in education, is substantiated. It was established that the successful cases and positive experience of the Bohdan Khmelnіtsky Melitopol State Pedagogical University of productive educational, scientific and cultural support of social processes in regional contexts affect the integration of participants in the educational process, teachers and students, the development of the social movement, the popularization of the values of the Ukrainian people, the strengthening of the national idea and statehood . The tenacity of the traditions of the Ukrainian educational and scientific community is substantiated - in the relentless pursuit of professional excellence, cooperation with local communities, educational institutions, public communities, unity and cohesion.

DEVELOPMENT OF THE MUTUAL AID AND SUPPORT ON UKRAINIAN LANDS: PECULIARITIES IN THE CONDITIONS OF THE FIRST WORLD WAR IN THE WEST OF UKRAINE

The article is devoted to the justification of the introduction of a special system of knowledge about war into the renewed system of higher education of Ukraine, its connection with the modern armed world, the policy of the ruling circles of aggressive states with the aim of intellectual resistance to war based on a deep understanding of its socio-political and humanitarian aspects. Russian aggression against Ukraine has created an existential danger for Ukrainians, the meaning of which is not only an attempt to implement the shameful statement "I will destroy you", but also an encroachment on the world order and the right for security. The authors insist that the initial knowledge at the level of the school program for the protection of the Motherland and the minimum knowledge about war ("tinitet") is not enough to understand the essence, content, anti-human consequences of new modes of wars - unprovoked aggressions and wars of the "new generation". The authors focus on the fact that the idea of creating a polemology course by the French thinker G. Butul was distorted by Russian interpreters, who began to see war as an "effective way of communication between civilizations" and justified it as a "substitute" in a "softer form of "special operations", denied rational, de-ideological knowledge of the meaning and consequences of wars, which would serve the transition to a just peace and a peaceful dialogue of cultures. The totality of such knowledge is due to the filling of scientific gaps in the development of the "Polemology" course, which is based on the empirical facts of past wars and everyday armed struggle. The article emphasizes the creation of a synthetic system of knowledge that combines the work of political conflictology, military science, social psychology and other rational ways of understanding war, including the generating ideas of works of art and military diaries of combatants, so that this knowledge has epistemological value and moral-political focus on intellectual resistance to the occupiers.

The work outlines the subject field of application of the project approach in the implementation of effective mechanisms for the protection of the rights of ethnic minorities (communities) of the temporarily occupied Melitopol and the formation of the cohesion of the multicultural community for the stability and restoration of the de-occupied post-war city and the Azov region. The point is that thanks to participation in the Council of Europe project «Supporting the reform of the national minority legal framework and the resilience of national minorities and Roma in Ukraine», Melitopol multicultural community has become one of the most consolidated among the representatives of those communities in the occupied territories of Ukraine, which were forced to temporarily leave their homes and the city. The main problems of preserving cultural diversity and observing the rights and freedom of ethnic communities, factors and mechanisms for improving the legislative and political framework for the protection of minority rights in Ukraine and promoting cooperation between local authorities and national minorities in war conditions are analyzed. Considered prospective approaches to the implementation of alternative methods of combating discrimination in martial law conditions and overcoming communication gaps between ethnic communities that remained in temporarily occupied Melitopol, live in the territory under the control of Ukraine or were forced to leave abroad. The mechanisms of implementation of successful cases and positive experience of the multicultural community of Melitopol in preventing and countering discrimination of persons belonging to national minorities (communities) and indigenous peoples of Melitopol are substantiated, based on modeling elements of social reality and intensive interpersonal interaction which madeit possible to become one of the most consolidated among the representatives of the communitieson the occupied Ukrainian territories.