Search results

Reality seems to have become a matter of ownership-everyone supposedly has the right to 'their' reality. In contrast, to this supposed freedom of acceptance, there is a 'scientific' interpretation of reality, which claims to be the only correct one in modern times. The text presented here wants to show not only the limitations of the 'scientific' interpretation, as a pure formalism, but especially that its ideological glosses cannot reveal the reality. Instead, they falsify it, not just as the success of theory, but as reality itself. This is especially visible in modern times. In that name, over a hundred years have passed since the theory suppresses subjectivity in the explanation of reality; philosophy at the level of the establishment has accepted this very task. However, it was not motivated only by theoretical reasons, but intentionally, as an imposition of the nature of reality and the idea of the human nature of subjectivity. Although the 'primacy of the theoretical' was promoted after Kant's 'primacy of the practical', theory as a formalism manifested violence in its own understanding of reality and at the same time, after all the apologies, subjectivity was not accepted within it as the foundation of reality, but as a place of application of systemic results. The author shows that this procedure is possible as an action in reality, but that it is beyond his power to explain it. Finally, the author is in favour of reintroducing subjectivity into the theoretical structuring of reality, because its interpretation without subjectivity is as wrong as it is involved in the interests of subjectivity that are not subjectivity as subjectivity. They think that from the epistemological situation and diagnosis of modernity, it is possible to derive a theory that can take into account the essential nature of subjectivity in the interpretation of the nature of reality.

Ovaj tekst predstalja napor da se akademska javnost uveri da je došlo vreme da se 'Učenje o Drugom' uvede kao obavezni predmet na završnim godinama studija filozofije. Pokušao sam da navedem najvažnije razloge zašto je to dobro. Isto tako, u radu se obrazlaže značaj samog pitanja o Drugom za filozofsku, ali ne samo za filozofsku, javnost. Tokom izlaganja teksta naznačio sam i liniju u istoriji filozofije koju bi u predavanjima i na vežbama iz ovog predmeta načelno trebalo slediti. Na kraju, na ovom kursu studentima bi bila pružena mogućnost različitih izvoda iz učenja, bilo ka socijalnoj ili političkoj filozofiji, psihologiji, filozofiji umetnosti itd.

The Transition by Uroš Šuvaković brings a serious and yet refreshing analysis of the transition, primarly in Serbia and Eastern Europe, but the author's focus also includes the Third World and, moreover, Western Europe, thus providing a complex and comprehensive analysis of the mentioned political and sociological phaenomenon. Unlike others, Šuvaković exposes the true nature of the process of transition, indicating its ultimate cause (the interests, primarely economic, of the U.S.), as well as its final aim: the poverty of the states undergone such a process. Likewise, the author investigates the role of media in transition and brings new, until now unpublished data on Albanian crimes on Kosovo and Metohija in the period 1991-2013 into light.