Search results

Frontmatter -- Contents -- Introduction -- I. Dictators, Old Style -- II. Dictators, New Style, and the Sort of Government They Set Up -- III. Dictators, New Style, and Their Epoch- Making Invention—the One-Party System -- IV. Propaganda, Education and Science; Youth Organizations and Women Under Dictatorships -- V. Dictators on Democracy, Haughty Disdain and Fraudulent Imitation -- VI. Do Dictators Dictate ? -- VII. Characteristics of Dictators; Are They Statesmen? -- VIII. Ten Points of Dictatorship; Franklin D. Roosevelt Fails to Qualify -- IX. What Are the Prospects of a Dictatorship in the United States ? -- Index

So controversial is the subject of thai address–"Reflections on the 'World Revolution' of 1940"–that a few words of justification in in order. You may be assured that it was not chosen without considerable thought and trepidation. To begin with, I made a study of the addresses of my thirty-four predecessors, as presented in the pages of the American Political Science Review. Without exception, these papers impressed me as wise, scholarly, finely stated, and cogently argued. Occasionally they were lightened by the lambent play of humor. On the other hand, several of them wen decidedly dry–a quality lees refreshing in discourses than in wines. Many of my predecessors dealt penetratingly and profoundly with topics taken from the fields of specialisation wherein they were masters, often the greatest of American masters. Others discussed broadly and philosophically the nature of political science, its relations to the social sciences in general, or the problems encountered in teaching this science.Of course so brief a summary cannot do justice to the almost infinite variety of materials presented by past presidents of our Association. There was, however, one type of subject which as a rule they avoided—that of contemporary, controversial political affairs. Even during the years of the First World War and immediately thereafter, this proved to be the case with only one or two exceptions. No doubt the motive which prompted most of my predecessors to avoid issues of the day was a sound one.