Search results

"This book proposes and defends the practice of urban gardening as an ecologically and socially beneficial, culturally innovative, morally appropriate, ethically uplifting, and politically incisive way for individuals and variously networked collectives to contribute to the promotion of urban resilience in the face of climate change and other defining challenges of the Anthropocene--this new epoch in which no earthly place, form, entity, process, or system escapes the reach of human activity."--Page [4] of cover

Il saggio difende l'idea che i contesti piů congeniali allo sviluppo e all'esercizio di un carattere virtuoso dal punto di vista ambientale siano i giardini e che il modo migliore per sviluppare ed esercitare tale carattere sia conservare specie botaniche, coltivandone esemplari con le proprie mani. La coltivazione di un giardino permette, e richiede, una certa comprensione e accettazione di importanti dimensioni del rapporto uomo-natura, le quali innescano comportamenti positivi che, consolidandosi nel tempo attraverso abitudine e riflessione, diventano veri e propri tratti caratteriali virtuosi. Le virtů sviluppate ed esercitate in giardino contribuiranno in modo decisivo alla buona riuscita dei nostri futuri sforzi verso la sostenibilitÀ, perché avranno un prezioso aspetto operativo, assente dalle virtů ambientali tipicamente contemplative che l'individuo puň invece sviluppare ed esercitare in aree naturali non umanizzate.

This Article explores the uneasy interaction between climate change and democracy, particularly liberal democracy. Its central claim is that climate change and other problems of the Anthropocene—this new epoch into which no earthly entity, process, or system escapes the reach and influence of human activity—expose and exacerbate existing vulnerabilities in democratic theory and practice, particularly in their currently dominant liberal form; and that both democracies' failures and their most promising attempts at managing these problems expose democracies to significant legitimacy challenges.

AbstractHow should we think of justice when the evil we can do to one another is not visible nor immediate, but rather impalpable and causally, spatially and temporally dispersed? What does justice demand, when our actions and institutions do not directly sabotage the life prospects of others but rather do so derivatively, by sabotaging the very eco‐systems in which such lives are or will be lived? In a globalized, resource‐depleted, overpopulated, rapidly changing, ecologically deteriorating world, what is owed to the billions of spatiotemporally distant people who are paying or shall pay the costs of the last 200 years of heavy industry, globalized trade and enthusiastic economic growth? And is that a question we can answer from within or by extending our present theories, or do we rather need to find new ways of thinking about what is just and unjust, once the level of our reflections becomes planetary and intergenerational?