Search results

It is the try comparing the Plato's, Plotinus's, Hegel's, Marx-Engels's dialectics systems in the case of the relationship between matter and idea and creation of new thingslead's principle (the circle's move and the opposites' struggle), but both of this systems was had the two principles. There is genetic similarity in the Plato's and Plotinus's, Hegel's and Marx-Engels's dialectics systems. But the Plato's and Hegel's, Plotinus's and Marx-Engels's have matter's similarity: the development in the first system produce by the circles' move, the development in the second system produce by the opposites' struggle. Directly idea goes into matter's and idea's dialectic in Plato's and Hegel's philosophy, but indirectly is it in Plotinus's and Marx-Engels's philosophy (it is thanks to the energy and activity).

The article examines postmodern as the crisis in the being of human and society in terms of the unity of theory and practice. There is compares postmodern society with the communist and information. There is analysis some variants of development, especially European society in terms of a new source of passionate impulse: new ethno genesis in connection with the increase in the number of migrants, passionate impetus from the US, China, Russia, emergence of a new syncretic religion. The conclusion is that the difference between the post-modern and the freedom not to have an ontological character are only apparent. Postmodern tolerance is a consequence of the absence of ontological foundation of postmodern existence.

The article examined the problem of the collapse of the person within A.F. Losev's dialectics, but without identifying the nature and energy. The essence of the person make a circular movement within the quaternary.The quaternary isconsisting of the following elements: onto-epistemology, social philosophy, internal and external identity plan. The circular movement of the person within the quaternary is because the person is emanation into the outer world (the excess of selfhood replaced his lack) in the course of their movement. Then there is the lack of replenishment (lack changes to excess). The materialization of the spirit of the person is an energetic emanation, is the essence of the personality of emanation in a formless, leading to the appearance of the simulacrum of the person. Materialized person is constantly in a state of collapse, because it does not possess the fullness of being, but only reported with being.

This article discusses the historical and philosophical forms of the existence of the fundamental onto-epistemological deception, in other words, archaeological exposition genealogy prospects fundamental onto-epistemological deception. The article related the "disintegration" of being and the "deconstruction" of metaphysics with the elimination of transcendentas something that is outside the subject-object relationship. Outside of the subject-object relationship was placed nothing, and being became nothing in next time. There are based on this think make conclusion about the dissolution of human in discourse and breakup of social role from a human. There are briefly shows the history of the relation of text and reality. There are tried to present postmodern philosophy in classical terms, near to the Hegelian. This explication helped define the concept of "simulacrum" through the concept of «thing (ens)" (ontic definition). Simulacrum is thing (ens) that cannot go out of possibility into reality due to the collapse of being, but differs by Difference like thing into unbeing. Such thing (ens) is false in nature, as there is no being (being is the truth). During the presentation there is a comparison of classical and post-modern philosophy.

This article examined deception like a game in the ontological, epistemological, existential, ethical, legal, aesthetic aspects. Emphasis gives to the aesthetic aspect: aesthetics needs saving mystery of beauty essence. Aesthetic shown with an example of the game of the actor on the stage, while the everyday life of the people more and more like a game of the actor on the stage. There is shown that any deception - is always a game, any game - is a deception, because deception and the game alienate and mediate reality, because the reality becomes unauthentic understanding of the world.

The article examined the dispute about the ideas between Aristotle and Plato as one of the cause of start of postmodern philosophy. Aristotle identified the idea (eidos) and form, which is cause of equating of the reality of the discourse and immanentization of being and apology of hedonism and the ambition of pleasure. The absence of a dialectical relationship between form and substance in the philosophy of Aristotle, and, in fact, the equation things and its form, that provides the degeneration of the original ideas in the simulacrum. Plato's opinion differed from the opinion of the opinion about the ideas of Aristotle. The idea determines the form of things, but not identical to it. The idea is transcendent, but not immanent of things. Aristotle's philosophy in its historical and philosophical deployment provided absence of truth, but not its being.

The article analyzes phenomenon of physicality in the context of the concept of «flesh» and in frame the dichotomy of matter and ideas. There is considers materialistic, postmodern and Christian aspects. The materialistic aspect equalizes «body» and «flesh» concepts. The postmodern aspect transforms the «body» in the «soma». And the Christian aspect of the materiality of the body and postulates the possibility of spiritualization of flesh.

The article examined sin as a deception and the game in the context of the dialectic of sin and hope. Selected philosophical and psychological aspects of the review only correlated to the religious. Based on the modes of "being" and "having" by E. Fromm and "flow" by M. Chiksentmihayi conducted polemics with the postmodern view that for the destruction of the will to power is required the destruction of the subject and its consciousness. Opposes the flow and consumerism, happiness and pleasure, personal development and selfish.

This article examined the role of freedom for life and belief in the context of postmodern philosophy through the prism of concepts of "simulacrum" and "double (similar)". There is examined the relationship of freedom in classical and postmodern philosophies. There is examined interaction of the two poles of the modern world (post-modern and classical) in the framework of the policy of multiculturalism and tolerance through the prism of concepts of "simulacrum" and "twin". There is make the conclusion about the absence of ontological reason for being and belief as being replaced by chaos, and belief is impossible without free will and thinking, which are replaced by machine of desire, spontaneity, that is associated with decoding the discourses and decrease the role of culture in human life.

The article examines the nature of time and relationship human and time on the Kantian position and modern physical basic. There are made the conclusion of the moral and aesthetic essence of time, the immanence of the good in time. There are compare the classical and post-modern understanding of time, analyzed different concepts of time. In the article human understand like a moral and free thing, personality and individuality (like understand human by German philosopher Kant).

The main aim of this article was to introduce and rationale the concept of "being-upon-time", which based on the temporality and the time of human life and of all things (existence). This article explicated questions, which are related with the unity of being and time, based on things (existence). Explicates life and existence as a unity of being and time, displayed that things and life are not identical.

There are analyzes the relation of the dialectic and deconstruction, examined various version of their relationship. There are make next conclusions. Every system of philosophy is dialectic (develops itself) and deconstruction (it is finding the weakness of previous systems and "mistakes" in them). Postmodern philosophy doubles metaphysics, dialectics, deconstruction: they become "classic" and "postmodern". "Postmodern" is a double of the deconstruction of the "classical" dialectics. "Deconstruction" tries to replace the dialectic on its "metaphysical" double. Deconstruction is a reformatting of the object (the disappearance of previous and appearance of a new which based on it) and dialectic which has come to its end, the edge, the absurd.

The article examines the monograph Derrida "On Grammatology". The focus is on anti-rational nature of postmodern philosophy. The Derrida's monography was analyzed in a broad historical and philosophical context. The Derrida's monography was written in the dialectic of replenish the flaw, culture replenish nature. Derrida understand nature as the unconscious and instinctive, and as a phonetic language. Nature is opposed to culture, writing language is opposed phonetic. The writing transforms language into a simulacrum.

This article discusses the "fundamental onto-epistemological deception " in terms of changes in the state of society in all historical times and reveals his "place" a finding in terms of ontology. It is concluded that "fundamental onto-epistemological deception" "localized" in the Heideggerian "open" between being and what is. The article gives a classification of phenomena, which are summarized under the name of "fundamental onto-epistemological deception" and the criterion of this generalization. Attention is drawn to the socio-philosophical, existential meaning of the concept "simulacrum." Fundamental onto-epistemological deception is revealed as a different sort of human waste from reality, from mirages, deterministic physical laws to simulacra whose absorption as a "spiritual food" takes away the meaning of life and deprives a person of his own "I". During the presentation it shows that the fundamental onto-epistemological deception - is not a phenomenon of the mystical order, as a consequence of free will, which manifests itself, including in the "optics" of perception and its setting. Attention is paid to knowledge as a natural human need and the search for his "I".

This article analyzes the dialectical of relationship of seriousness and responsibility. For this purpose made explicit the relationship of the seriousness and the hierarchy of being, and the seriousness and laughter. The article shows that a serious person responsible dialectically negated a laugh: that to be a serious necessary to release responsibility with help of laughter.