Search results

УДК 340.130.5+342.4The legal theory and practical problems of interpretation (explanation) of adopted acts are analyzed in the article. The author researches Belarusian legislation, theory of law and legal acts of public authorities.The article gives a detailed description of the types of interpretation, such as authentic, casual, – with examples from Belarusian legislation.Attention is drawn in the article to existing shortcomings, in particular, liability of organizations and individuals when they act in accordance with the official response, abolished by superior authorities.The author offers comprehension of the problems associated with contradictory practice of promulgation the adopted acts of interpretation, disputes regarding the list of authorities, who are able to clarify such act.The author emphasizes that if the explanation given to one requesting applicant, previously formulated rule must have the power at emergence of a similar situation concerning an-other requesting applicant. The author believes that the taxpayer or other applicant should have possibility to claim into the court if he disagrees with personal answer given by relevant authority (an official).The author speaks about the necessity of recognition of precedent as source of law. Judicial and other precedent are at the core of law enforcement practice, the guarantor of a uniform enforcement practice.In conclusion it is emphasized the necessity of improving existing legislation, the proposals are introduced. ; УДК 340.130.5+342.4В статье анализируется белорусское законодательство, позиции ученых и практика относительно дачи органами государственной власти толкования (разъяснения) принятых актов. Обращается внимание на имеющиеся недостатки, в частности привлечение юридических и физических лиц к ответственности, когда они действовали в соответствии с полученным от должностного лица ответом, но с которым не согласилась вышестоящая организация, разноречивую практику доведения до сведения принятых актов толкования, споры относительно круга инстанций, к которым можно обратиться по поводу данного разъяснения акта. Подчеркивается необходимость совершенствования действующего законодательства, вносятся соответствующие предложения.

The article examines the doctrine of the rights and freedoms of man and citizen. The connection between the theory of human rights and freedoms and the history of the development of society is traced. The works of thinkers of the past are analyzed. The dynamics of views on the development of rights and freedoms is shown. Special attention is focused on two basic concepts of rights and freedoms – natural-legal and positivist, the general and special in their content are highlighted. Both of these concepts consider human rights as a certain view of the world outlook, worldview, which are based on the principle of humanism, and also as a system of humanistic values that determine relationships in society. Attention is drawn to the essential features of human rights. A brief analysis of three generations of human rights is carried out. It is emphasized that this classification is classical. However, new times force us to look at the classification problem in a new way. The classification of human and civil rights allows you to see their evolution, the historical connection of times, the general trend of development. The conclusion is substantiated that in the current period of human development, taking into account the achievements of science, primarily biomedicine, we can talk about the fourth generation of human rights, the socalled somatic rights. In this century, the focus on somatic human rights has become a feature. They increasingly occupy the attention of international organizations, become the subject of discussion at the national and international levels, since through their prism the nature of the relationship between a person and a state is assessed.

The subject. The article analyzes the phenomenon of the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on the human rights and freedoms. It emphasizes that some information about the corona-virus infection was available several decades ago. At the same time, the specialists unfortunately weren't ready for the possible mutation of this virus, which has now exposed a large-scales threat to the population of the whole world.The purpose of the article is to identify the problems of the implementation of the citizens' rights and offer proposals for improving the Russian and Belarusian legislation and the practice of its implementation in the field of combating the coronavirus infection.The methodology. The authors take into account the practice of the European Court of Hu-man Rights and the constitutional control bodies of Russia and foreign countries. They make a conclusion on the legitimacy and necessity of the taken restrictive measures. The article is based on the dialectical method, as well as at the logical, historical, systemic methods. Methods of analysis and synthesis were of particular importance. The authors have applied the functional method to research the main areas for ensuring a reasonable balance of private (individual) and public interests.The main results, scope of application. Modern constitutions, including the Russian and the Belarusian ones, contains the most important principles of the rule of law, enshrine human rights and freedoms as the highest value. Human rights and freedoms continue to be are at the epicenter of many disputes and discussions. The modern system of rights and freedoms is constantly developing; the legal status of a person receives new content as the human civilization develops and the paradigm of values changes. For example, we see how information technology and other advances affect the scope of rights and freedoms. Rights, freedoms and obligations are interconnected and interdependent. All groups of rights are currently in the field of view of international organizations. The problem of equality, the elimination of discrimination, the restoration of violated rights, the assessment of the limits of the state's invasion in human rights and freedoms continues to be relevant nowadays.The article focuses on the international and national standards for the possible restriction of rights and freedoms in order to protect the health of the population. The international law rules on human rights oblige states to take measures to protect health and provide medical assistance to those in need.Conclusions. One of the constant problems is the relationship between the rights of a particular person and the rights of other persons, group or society as a whole and the state. At the same time, the coronavirus pandemic forced the public authorities to determine the balance of the priority of human rights and freedoms or the protection of the life and health of citizens. The coronavirus pandemic is the factor that affects the content of the legal regulation of relations in the field of human rights and freedoms. The measures taken by the state affect the right to health protection, freedom of movement, the right to education, right to have sport activity, right to work, freedom of assembly and others.The article proposes to inform the population more fully about the measures taken by the state and society in this direction, about the wider use of information technologies, about the possible responsibility for non-compliance with the requirements for the use of per-sonal protective equipment and the self-isolation regime. ; Предметом исследования являются правоотношения, складывающиеся в условиях пандемии коронавируса COVID-19, в рамках которых возникают основания для ограничений прав и свобод человека и гражданина. Поставлена цель провести анализ динамики развития пандемии коронавируса с позиций ее влияния на права и свободы граждан. Методологической базой исследования является диалектический метод научного познания, а также логический, исторический, системный методы. Особое значение имели методы анализа и синтеза. Применен функциональный метод для исследования основных направлений обеспечения разумного баланса частных (индивидуальных) и публичных интересов. Акцентировано внимание на международных и национальных стандартах возможного ограничения прав и свобод в целях защиты здоровья населения. Внесен ряд предложений по совершенствованию российского и белорусского законодательства и практики его применения в сфере противодействия коронавирусной инфекции.