Search results
Filter
9 results
Sort by:
Checking availability at your location
This article is also available at your library: |
electronic
print
SSRN
Article(electronic)#22021
Integrating Diversity into the Constitutional Law Classroom: Roe, Abortion, and Reproductive Justice
In: Integrating Diversity into the Constitutional Law Classroom: Roe, Abortion, and Reproductive Justice, in DOCTRINE AND DIVERSITY: INCLUSION AND EQUITY IN THE LAW SCHOOL CLASSROOM, eds. Nicole P. Dyszlewski, et al. (Carolina Academic Press 2021)
Checking availability at your location
This article is also available at your library: |
electronic
print
SSRN
Article(electronic)#32019
Conversion Therapy: A Brief Reflection on the History of the Practice and Contemporary Regulatory Efforts
In: 52 Creighton L. Rev. 419 (2019)
Checking availability at your location
This article is also available at your library: |
electronic
print
SSRN
Checking availability at your location
This article is also available at your library: |
electronic
print
SSRN
Article(electronic)#52013
Rethinking Section Five: Deference, Direct Regulation, and Restoring Congressional Authority to Enforce the Fourteenth Amendment
In: 65 Rutgers L. Rev. 667 (2013)
Checking availability at your location
This article is also available at your library: |
electronic
print
SSRN
Article(electronic)#62011
The Shifting Doctrinal Face of Immutability
In: 19 Va. J. Soc. Pol'y & L. 169 (2011)
Checking availability at your location
This article is also available at your library: |
electronic
print
SSRN
Article(electronic)#72009
Exploring the Impact of the Marriage Amendments: Can Public Employers Offer Domestic Partner Benefits to Their Gay and Lesbian Employees?
In: 17 Va. J. Soc. Pol'y and the L. 83 (2009)
Checking availability at your location
This article is also available at your library: |
electronic
print
SSRN
Article(electronic)#82008
Exploring the Impact of the Marriage Amendments: Can Public Employers Offer Domestic Partner Benefits to Their Gay and Lesbian Employees?
In: Villanova Law/Public Policy Research Paper No. 2008-14
Checking availability at your location
This article is also available at your library: |
electronic
print
SSRN
Article(electronic)#9March 2000
Gender differences in empathic accuracy: Differential ability or differential motivation?
In: Personal relationships, Volume 7, Issue 1, p. 95-109
ISSN: 1475-6811
AbstractFollowing their qualitative review of the findings from 10 relevant studies, Graham and Ickes (1997) speculated that reliable gender‐of‐perceiver differences in empathic accuracy (a) were limited to studies in which the empathic inference form made empathic accuracy salient as the dimension of interest, and (b) therefore reflected the differential motivation, rather than the differential ability, of female versus male perceivers. These speculations were tested more rigorously in the present study, which examined a larger set of 15 empathic accuracy studies and applied the techniques of quantitative meta‐analysis to test Graham and Ickes'(1997) moderating variable hypothesis. The hypothesis was strongly supported, consistent with a motivational interpretation previously proposed by Berman (1980) and by Eisenberg and Lemon (1983), which argues that reliable gender differences in empathy‐related measures are found only in situations in which (a) subjects are aware that they are being evaluated on an empathy‐relevant dimension, and/or (b) empathy‐relevant gender‐role expectations or obligations are made salient.
Checking availability at your location
This article is also available at your library: |
electronic
print