The flexible assertive community treatment fidelity scale: description of the development in the Netherlands and adaptation in Denmark and Sweden
In: Nordic Social Work Research, Volume 13, Issue 2, p. 259-266
ISSN: 2156-8588
5 results
Sort by:
In: Nordic Social Work Research, Volume 13, Issue 2, p. 259-266
ISSN: 2156-8588
In: Gijzen , M , Schields-Zeeman , L , Kleinjan , M , Kroon , H , van der Roest , H , Bolier , L , Smit , F & de Beurs , D 2020 , ' The bittersweet effects of COVID-19 on mental health : Results of an online survey among a sample of the Dutch population five weeks after relaxation of lockdown restriction ' , International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health , vol. 17 , no. 23 , 9073 . https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17239073
Previous research shows that crises can have both negative and positive mental health effects on the population. The current study explored these effects in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic after relaxation of governmental measures. An online survey was administered among a representative sample of the Dutch population (n = 1519) in June 2020, ten weeks after the peak of COVID-19 had passed, and five weeks after restrictions were relaxed. Participants were asked about mental health, adverse events during COVID-19, and about any positive effects of the pandemic. Most participants (80%, n = 1207) reported no change in mental health since the COVID-19 pandemic. This was also the case among respondents who had experienced an adverse event. Protective factors of mental health were being male and high levels of positive mental well-being. Risk factors were emotional loneliness and the experience of adverse life events. Social loneliness was positively associated with stable mental health, stressing the importance of meaningful relationships. Note that 58% of participants reported positive effects of the pandemic, the most common of which were rest, working from home, and feeling more socially connected. In summary, 10 weeks after the start of the crisis, and 5 weeks after relaxation of the restrictions, most people remained stable during the crisis, and were even able to report positive effects.
BASE
In: Forensische Psychiatrie, Psychologie, Kriminologie, Volume 13, Issue 2, p. 209-209
ISSN: 1862-7080
Erratum zu:
Forens Psychiatr Psychol Kriminol 2018
10.1007/s11757-018-0476-1
Der Artikel Qualitätskriterien forensischer Ambulanzen des Strafvollzugs von C. Schwarze et al. wurde ursprünglich am 1. Juni 2018 ohne "Open Access" online auf der Internetplattform des Verlags publiziert. …
In: Forensische Psychiatrie, Psychologie, Kriminologie, Volume 12, Issue 4, p. 369-379
ISSN: 1862-7080
Zusammenfassung
Mit dem Gesetz zur Reform der Führungsaufsicht 2007 wurde forensische Nachsorge sowohl für ehemalige Patienten aus dem Maßregelvollzug als auch für Straffällige aus dem Justizvollzug verbindlich etabliert. Im Lauf der vergangenen zehn Jahre entstanden somit bundesweit forensische Ambulanzen des Strafvollzugs, welche den gesetzlichen Auftrag zu Behandlung und Betreuung entlassener Straffälliger länderspezifisch umsetzen. Hierbei handelt es sich teils um neu gegründete Ambulanzen, teils um bereits lange in der Behandlung von straffälligen Menschen tätige Einrichtungen, die ihr bisheriges Angebot um die Betreuung von Menschen unter Führungsaufsicht erweiterten. Diese heterogenen Ambulanzen haben sich seit einigen Jahren in einem jährlich stattfindenden fachlichen Austausch bundesweit vernetzt und Gemeinsamkeiten, Unterschiede und Besonderheiten in der Umsetzung des gesetzlichen Auftrags diskutiert. Angestoßen von der Diskussion um Mindeststandards in forensisch-psychiatrischen Nachsorgeambulanzen des Maßregelvollzugs 2014 entwickelte diese Bundesarbeitsgemeinschaft der forensischen Ambulanzen des Strafvollzug Qualitätskriterien, die trotz verschiedener Länder- und Trägerspezifika gemeinsame inhaltliche und formale Parameter erfolgreicher ambulanter Behandlung zur Deliktprävention fokussieren. Der Artikel stellt das Ergebnis dieses Diskussionsprozesses mit den verabschiedeten Qualitätskriterien in den Kategorien Struktur‑, Prozess- und Ergebnisqualität vor.
Background: Surgery is the main modality of cure for solid cancers and was prioritised to continue during COVID-19 outbreaks. This study aimed to identify immediate areas for system strengthening by comparing the delivery of elective cancer surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic in periods of lockdown versus light restriction. Methods: This international, prospective, cohort study enrolled 20 006 adult (≥18 years) patients from 466 hospitals in 61 countries with 15 cancer types, who had a decision for curative surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic and were followed up until the point of surgery or cessation of follow-up (Aug 31, 2020). Average national Oxford COVID-19 Stringency Index scores were calculated to define the government response to COVID-19 for each patient for the period they awaited surgery, and classified into light restrictions (index 60). The primary outcome was the non-operation rate (defined as the proportion of patients who did not undergo planned surgery). Cox proportional-hazards regression models were used to explore the associations between lockdowns and non-operation. Intervals from diagnosis to surgery were compared across COVID-19 government response index groups. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04384926. Findings: Of eligible patients awaiting surgery, 2003 (10·0%) of 20 006 did not receive surgery after a median follow-up of 23 weeks (IQR 16-30), all of whom had a COVID-19-related reason given for non-operation. Light restrictions were associated with a 0·6% non-operation rate (26 of 4521), moderate lockdowns with a 5·5% rate (201 of 3646; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·81, 95% CI 0·77-0·84; p<0·0001), and full lockdowns with a 15·0% rate (1775 of 11 827; HR 0·51, 0·50-0·53; p<0·0001). In sensitivity analyses, including adjustment for SARS-CoV-2 case notification rates, moderate lockdowns (HR 0·84, 95% CI 0·80-0·88; p<0·001), and full lockdowns (0·57, 0·54-0·60; p<0·001), remained independently associated with non-operation. Surgery beyond 12 weeks from diagnosis in patients without neoadjuvant therapy increased during lockdowns (374 [9·1%] of 4521 in light restrictions, 317 [10·4%] of 3646 in moderate lockdowns, 2001 [23·8%] of 11 827 in full lockdowns), although there were no differences in resectability rates observed with longer delays. Interpretation: Cancer surgery systems worldwide were fragile to lockdowns, with one in seven patients who were in regions with full lockdowns not undergoing planned surgery and experiencing longer preoperative delays. Although short-term oncological outcomes were not compromised in those selected for surgery, delays and non-operations might lead to long-term reductions in survival. During current and future periods of societal restriction, the resilience of elective surgery systems requires strengthening, which might include protected elective surgical pathways and long-term investment in surge capacity for acute care during public health emergencies to protect elective staff and services.
BASE