21 results
Sort by:
Presents a model of democratic legitimacy for within international counter-terrorism co-operation, exploring the current practices of EU counter-terrorism policing, post- 9/11, and the challenges it presents to democratic legitimacy, as well as the solutions to ensure 'democratic' counter-terrorism actions and the protection of human rights.
In: Perspectives on politics, Volume 19, Issue 3, p. 1043-1045
ISSN: 1541-0986
In: Intelligence and national security, Volume 34, Issue 1, p. 38-61
ISSN: 1743-9019
In: Journal of intelligence history: official publication of the International Intelligence History Association (IIHA), Volume 16, Issue 2, p. 91-94
ISSN: 2169-5601
In: International affairs, Volume 93, Issue 1, p. 241-242
ISSN: 1468-2346
In: Intelligence and national security, Volume 27, Issue 5, p. 689-706
ISSN: 1743-9019
In: Intelligence and national security, Volume 27, Issue 5, p. 689-707
ISSN: 0268-4527
In: Journal of common market studies: JCMS, Volume 49, Issue 6, p. 1365-1367
ISSN: 0021-9886
In: Millennium: journal of international studies, Volume 39, Issue 2, p. 577-578
ISSN: 1477-9021
In: Journal of common market studies: JCMS, Volume 48, Issue 4, p. 1159-1161
ISSN: 0021-9886
In: Millennium: journal of international studies, Volume 39, Issue 2, p. 577-579
ISSN: 0305-8298
In: Routledge Companion to Intelligence Studies
In: Juridikum: die Zeitschrift für Kritik - Recht - Gesellschaft, Issue 2, p. 166-169
ISSN: 2309-7477
In: The Palgrave Handbook of Security, Risk and Intelligence, p. 1-24
In: Journal of common market studies: JCMS, Volume 46, Issue 1, p. 101-124
ISSN: 1468-5965
Within European law enforcement circles, counter-terrorism networks and privileged partnerships tend to be preferred to formal bureaucratic structures because of their flexibility and directness. The professional preference for informal, bilateral and privileged relationships may, however, undermine the potential of formally established agencies such as Europol and Eurojust, which work through national and centrally co-ordinated channels of information and intelligence. This article seeks to assess whether standards of democratic, legal and social legitimacy are under pressure as a consequence of this persistent preference for horizontal, direct and informal co-operation. Adapted from the source document.