The following links lead to the full text from the respective local libraries:
Alternatively, you can try to access the desired document yourself via your local library catalog.
If you have access problems, please contact us.
Search results
Filter
9 results
Sort by:
Checking availability at your location
This book is also available at your library:
Article(electronic)#2July 1988
Deliveries on the CME Live Cattle Contract: An Economic Assessment
In: North central journal of agricultural economics: NCJAE, Volume 10, Issue 2, p. 155
Checking availability at your location
This article is also available at your library: |
electronic
print
Article(electronic)#3July 1988
Deliveries on the CME Live Cattle Contract: An Economic Assessment
In: Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Volume 10, Issue 2, p. 155-164
ISSN: 2040-5804
AbstractDeliveries on the CME live cattle contract respond to the delivery month basis, discounts for yield grade 4 carcasses, and limited seasonal influences. Modification of the contract to tighten quality standards resulted in a decline in the response of deliveries to the yield grade 4 carcass discounts. The certificate delivery system appears to have had no significant effect on the total number of deliveries. Analysis of spatial combinations of delivery points suggests that markets east of the Mississippi River respond to different factors than the western markets.
Checking availability at your location
This article is also available at your library: |
electronic
print
Article(electronic)#4December 2011
Oligopsony Fed Cattle Pricing: Did Mandatory Price Reporting Increase Meatpacker Market Power?
In: Applied economic perspectives and policy, Volume 33, Issue 4, p. 606-622
ISSN: 2040-5804
AbstractWe study beef packing margins before and after mandatory price reporting (MPR) was implemented in 2001 using a model that identifies and tests for switching between cooperative and non‐cooperative regime pricing. Our results show that after MPR took effect, the duration of non‐cooperative regimes was considerably shorter, while cooperative regimes were longer. Oligopsonistic rent, as measured by average economic profit, rose from $0.88/head in the 1990s to $2.59/head after 2001. While MPR is not likely the sole cause for such an increase, there was clearly more market power being exercised in fed cattle markets in the years after the program was implemented than before.
Checking availability at your location
This article is also available at your library: |
electronic
print
Open Access#52007
Chronic wasting disease: government and private sector action ; June 2003 Livestock and wildlife disease report, no. 6
June 2003. ; Originally published under series title: Agricultural and resource policy report, APR 03-06. ; Includes bibliographical references.
BASE
Article(electronic)#6September 1996
Price Discovery in an Experimental Market for Fed Cattle
In: Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Volume 18, Issue 3, p. 449-466
ISSN: 2040-5804
Checking availability at your location
This article is also available at your library: |
electronic
print
Article(electronic)#7September 1995
Augmenting Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness Education with Experiential Learning
In: Review of agricultural economics: RAE, Volume 17, Issue 3, p. 267
ISSN: 1467-9353
Checking availability at your location
This article is also available at your library: |
electronic
print
Article(electronic)#81999
Marketing Agreement Impacts in an Experimental Market for Fed Cattle
In: American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Volume 81, Issue 2, p. 347-358
Checking availability at your location
This article is also available at your library: |
electronic
print
SSRN
Article(electronic)#9June 21, 2022
Potential beef cattle topics in the 2023 farm bill
In: Applied economic perspectives and policy, Volume 44, Issue 3, p. 1261-1272
ISSN: 2040-5804
AbstractFarm bill programs impacting beef cattle producers have been dispersed throughout previous farm bills. Greater attention on cattle markets in recent years is likely to lead to increased debate on beef cattle topics ahead of the 2023 Farm Bill. We examine cattle topics found in previous farm bills as indicators of future farm bill inclusion. We then discuss recent market events and resulting policy requests by producers. We subsequently focus on current topics that seem likely to spill over into farm bill debate, and we finish with suggestions regarding where agricultural economists can provide useful input into the policy process.
Checking availability at your location
This article is also available at your library: |
electronic
print