Reflexivity and the Construction of the International Object: The Case of Human Rights1: Reflexivity and the International Object
In: International political sociology, Volume 5, Issue 3, p. 259-275
ISSN: 1749-5687
9 results
Sort by:
In: International political sociology, Volume 5, Issue 3, p. 259-275
ISSN: 1749-5687
In: Revue française de science politique, Volume 60, Issue 2, p. 271-294
ISSN: 1950-6686
Résumé L'article analyse la genèse de la Charte européenne des droits fondamentaux comme un exemple de fabrique d'un traité européen. Le processus de négociation de la Charte y est examiné à la fois comme un processus à court terme et à long terme. S'agissant du processus à court terme, l'analyse met en lumière les efforts déployés en vue d'établir un nouveau cadre de négociation sous la forme d'une Convention. En ce qui concerne la Charte dans la longue durée , l'article souligne deux structures sociales et politiques préexistantes : le champ des droits de l'homme et les pratiques établies de négociation des traités de l'Union européenne.
In: Revue française de science politique, Volume 60, Issue 2, p. 271-295
ISSN: 0035-2950
In: Revue française de science politique, Volume 60, Issue 2, p. 271-295
ISSN: 0035-2950
In: International Political Sociology, Volume 5, Issue 3, p. 219-224
In: International political sociology, Volume 5, Issue 3, p. 219-224
ISSN: 1749-5687
This special issue of International Political Sociology consists of a symposium of papers that demonstrate the possibilities applying the political sociology of Pierre Bourdieu to international studies, both theoretically and empirically. The papers are all derived from a panel entitled "A Different Reading of the International" organized at the 2010 ISA Annual Conference in New Orleans. Correspondingly, the main claim of this special issue is that the sociology of Bourdieu provides a different look at the international, one that is highly productive for further transforming international studies. Our interest in developing this specific symposium has moreover been spurred by the general momentum which Bourdieusian sociology currently is experiencing with respect to both international and European studies (for references, please see the individual chapters). In this growing literature, one can now distinguish between a grouping of more sociologically informed studies and an emergent body of political science research which draws on Bourdieusian concepts. This symposium has a more sociological orientation than is usual in international studies, which is still very much dominated by political science reasoning. It also insists on the need to conduct empirical research using a specific set of thinking tools derived from Pierre Bourdieu's sociology as a means for providing a new reading of the international. Our goal is, however, not to provide a history of Bourdieusian ideas or to celebrate Pierre Bourdieu as yet another rising star in the pantheon of fashionable French thinkers for the IR market. We also resist treating Bourdieu as a philosopher cutoff from his empirical research on "examples" that seem irrelevant for IR specialists, or presenting a ready-made and condensed version of Bourdieu for an IR audience in search of minor adjustments in the division of labor between soft constructivism and mainstream realism. Adapted from the source document.
In: Nordic journal of international law, Volume 80, Issue 3, p. 257-277
ISSN: 1571-8107
In: Nordic journal of international law, Volume 80, Issue 3, p. 235-239
ISSN: 1571-8107
In: Nordic journal of international law, Volume 80, Issue 3, p. 257-277
ISSN: 1571-8107
AbstractThe article analyses the interface of Denmark and internationalisation of human rights with the goal of examining the transformation of the place and perception of international law in Scandinavia over the last decades. More precisely, the article contrasts two fundamentally different moments of the interface of international human rights and Denmark: first a period of external engagement in which Denmark – and the other Scandinavian countries – developed their position as virtuous defenders of international law and human rights and, secondly, the eventual national implications of international human rights law. This approach allows us to more generally analyse the interrelationship between the internationalisation of human rights and its eventual effect on Danish legal and political practices. We generally argue that the original politics of virtue in the area of international law and particularly international human rights law declined when international human rights started having national implications, that is, it no longer was simply a good of export. We, moreover, argue that the realistic approach developed in the national context now is having significant spill-over effects on Denmark's international policies in the area.