Search results

The article presents the author's analysis of CIS constitutions to identify the territorial norms in them, taking into account the integrated approach to the definition of the latter. Typical constitutive formats relating to the territory in the focus group of states have been identified and characterized. The consideration of the options for constitutional and legal consolidation of the territorial norms in CIS countries is conditioned by the fact that at the time of the Soviet Union collapse "as a geopolitical reality" the republics received sovereignty and were in a comparable system of political and legal coordinates. The research attention is focused on the identification of the constitutional format concerning the territorial norms in the member states and CIS participants (Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan). ; El artículo presenta el análisis del autor de las constituciones de la CEI para identificar las normas territoriales en ellas, teniendo en cuenta el enfoque integrado de la definición de esta última. Se han identificado y caracterizado formatos constitutivos típicos relacionados con el territorio en el grupo focal de estados. La consideración de las opciones para la consolidación constitucional y legal de las normas territoriales en los países de la CEI está condicionada al hecho de que en el momento del colapso de la Unión Soviética "como realidad geopolítica" las repúblicas recibieron soberanía y estaban en un sistema comparable de política y coordenadas legales La atención de la investigación se centra en la identificación del formato constitucional relativo a las normas territoriales en los Estados miembros y los participantes de la CEI (Armenia, Azerbaiyán, Bielorrusia, Kazajstán, Kirguistán, Moldavia, Tayikistán, Turkmenistán, Uzbekistán). ; O artigo apresenta a análise do autor das constituições do CIS para identificar as normas territoriais nelas contidas, levando em consideração a abordagem integrada para a definição das últimas. Formatos constitutivos típicos relacionados ao território no grupo focal de estados foram identificados ecaracterizados. A consideração das opções para a consolidação constitucional e legal das normas territoriais nos países da CEI é condicionada pelo fato de que na época do colapso da União Soviética "como uma realidade geopolítica" as repúblicas receberam soberania e estavam em um sistema comparável de política e coordenadas legais. A atenção da pesquisa está focada na identificação do formato constitucional relativo às normas territoriais nos estados membros e participantes da CEI (Armênia, Azerbaijão, Bielorrússia, Cazaquistão, Quirguistão, Moldávia, Tadjiquistão, Turcomenistão, Uzbequistão).

The article presents the author's analysis of CIS constitutions to identify the territorial norms in them, taking into account the integrated approach to the definition of the latter. Typical constitutive formats relating to the territory in the focus group of states have been identified and characterized. The consideration of the options for constitutional and legal consolidation of the territorial norms in CIS countries is conditioned by the fact that at the time of the Soviet Union collapse "as a geopolitical reality" the republics received sovereignty and were in a comparable system of political and legal coordinates. The research attention is focused on the identification of the constitutional format concerning the territorial norms in the member states and CIS participants (Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan).

This article examines the theoretical approaches and legislative decisions of the Eastern European states' cocerning the purposes and principles of administrative proceedings. Based on the analysis of relevant scientific works and legislation, it has been concluded that both the objectives of administrative proceedings and its principles relate to the human rights and freedoms. At the same time, the doctrinally articulated objectives do not find their systematic reflection in the legislation, and the principles are a universal legal element that determines the relationships between the executive authorities and citizens.

The article deals with some issues of the state power restriction, and the necessity of this is justified. The evolution of state power restriction certain criteria and forms are analyzed in accordance with the emergence of relevant ideas and scientific concepts and their chronology: the restriction of power by another power, self-restraint of state power; the restriction of state power by the law and human rights in connection with the contemporary problems of state power restrictions in a state governed by the rule of law.

Based on the analytical and synthesis study of a wide range of published documentary sources, the article presents the authors' approach to the issue of self-restriction of state power. General theoretical aspects, historical and oriented to the current state of the problem were considered in order to analyze the self-limitation of the authority of the State in theory and in concrete reality. Methodologically, it is a study that uses in equal conditions the qualitative analysis of the systems and processes that emerge from the exercise of the authority of the State, with the hermeneutic reading of the legal doctrine that accounts for the matter. It is concluded that, in the considered context of the Russian Federation, the problem of the constant and continuous improvement of the system of separation of state power often seems to manifest itself satisfactorily. Theoretically, at first sight, once regulated, the corresponding system a priori acquires a constant and stable character, however, there is still a long way to go to achieve the foundation of a sustained dynamic of self-limitation and self-regulation of state power in in line with the principles of the rule of law.