Search results

The primary task for political economy of socialism was to elaborate a project of the new society. Looking forward into the future, that is positioning beyond current reality, was its mission, not a flaw, for which it is routinely blamed. At the same time, the future socialist society was thought through negation of capitalism as a system based on private property. Therefore, the theme of ownership was at the centre of the socialist project. Creating specific type of discourse was its component part. Sophistication in mastering its rules was a prerequisite of meaningful communication within this discourse. That's why the texts as artifacts of this discourse need to be deciphered today. In this paper, dealing with the history of Soviet economic debates about ownership, it is attempted to reveal most relevant, even if often implicit, meanings which leading Soviet political economists were aiming to express in their works. The authors analyse historical background of the Soviet ownership discourse, its formation in the early Soviet, as well as in Stalin's periods, competing research programmes of its transformation in the 1960s and 1970s, and its breakup at the turn of the 1990s.

Статтю присвячено проблемам, пов'язаним із реформуванням системи управління земельними ресурсами з часу започаткування земельної реформи і по теперішній час. Така потреба виникла із-за чергової спроби здійснити реорганізацію структури земельних органів. На підставі здійсненого аналізу щодо повноважень центрального органу виконавчої влади, органів місцевого самоврядування з'ясовано, що новостворена служба Держгеокадастру не сприяє ефективності системи управління, перш за все на національному рівні, оскільки здійснює функції не передбачені як «Положенням про Держгеокадастр», так і іншими нормативними документами. Крім того, на місцевому рівні виявлено відсторонення місцевого самоврядування у вирішенні питань у сфері земельних відносин. В кінцевому підсумку - запропоновано перерозподіл повноважень на системній основі на рівні центральних органів виконавчої влади та органів місцевого самоврядування з метою реформування системи управління земельними ресурсами з врахуванням децентралізаційних процесів в Україні.Ключові слова: управління земельними ресурсами, Держкомзем, Держземагенство, Держгеокадастр, Мінрегіон, Мінагрополітики, функції, повноваження, центральні органи виконавчої влади, органи місцевого самоврядування. ; The article is devoted to the problems related to the reform of land management from the beginning of the land reform ill the presentine. This need has arisen due to making another attempt to reorganize the structure of the land structures. With the launch of the land reform established the State Committee of Ukraine for Land Resources in 1992. To speed up land reform and land privatization in 2001 formed the administrative bodies of the State Committee for Land Resources of Ukraine. In order to improve the system of state land management in 2011 created the State Agency of Land Resources of Ukraine, which was reorganized in 2014 into the State Service of Ukraine of geodesy, cartography and cadastre. Over the years, in order to "optimize" the system of central executive body, content of this body has not been changed and constantly was changing its name and subordination, namely: the State Committee for Land Resources - Ministry of Ecology and Natural Resources of Ukraine, the State Agency of Land Resources of Ukraine - Ministry of Agrarian policy and Food of Ukraine, State Service of Ukraine of geodesy, cartography and cadastre - Ministry of regional development, construction and housing.On the basis of analysis concerning the powers of the central executive authorities, local authorities found that the newly farmed Service State Land Cadastre das not contribute to the effectiveness of the administration, especially at the national level, as these features ave not provided by "Regulations on State Land Cadastre " and other regulations. In addition, the local level detected removal of local government in matters of land relations.In conclusion, proposed system based redistribution of powers on the level of central executive bodies and local authorities to reform the system of land management with regard to decentralized processes in Ukraine.It is advisable to restore central authority for land reform and regulation of land relations to the structure of the executive authorities in coordinating its activities directly to the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine or the Ministry of Agrarian Policy and Food of Ukraine and provide the following powers:ü development of legislation in the sphere of land relations for the development and implementation of the state land policy;ü coordination of the completion of land reform;ü cadastre at national level;ü land management at the national level;ü monitoring at the national level;ü state control over the land use and land protection.State Service of Geodesy and Cartography post in the Ministry of Regional Development, Construction and Housing and Communal Services of UkraineLocal governments provide the following powers:• implementation of land policy at regional and local levels;• Organization of Land Management; cadastre, land protection.•transfer the right to control agricultural lands within the territories of Commons as faras the institution of land zoning is established.Keywords: management of land resources, Goskomzem, Goszemagenstvo, Derzhgeokadastr, Ministry of Regional Development, Ministry of Agricultural Policy, functions, powers, central executive authorities, local self-government.