Malteserorden und Volkergemeinschaft. By Robert Prantner. Berlin and Munchen: Duncker & Humblot, 1974. 256 pp. DM 48.60
In: The British yearbook of international law, Volume 48, Issue 1, p. 433-434
ISSN: 2044-9437
22 results
Sort by:
In: The British yearbook of international law, Volume 48, Issue 1, p. 433-434
ISSN: 2044-9437
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Volume 70, Issue 4, p. 856-857
ISSN: 2161-7953
In: The British yearbook of international law, Volume 47, Issue 1, p. 439-439
ISSN: 2044-9437
In: The British yearbook of international law, Volume 47, Issue 1, p. 463-464
ISSN: 2044-9437
In: The British yearbook of international law, Volume 47, Issue 1, p. 443-444
ISSN: 2044-9437
In: The British yearbook of international law, Volume 47, Issue 1, p. 448-449
ISSN: 2044-9437
In: The British yearbook of international law, Volume 47, Issue 1, p. 483-484
ISSN: 2044-9437
In: The round table: the Commonwealth journal of international affairs, Volume 62, Issue 248, p. 411-423
ISSN: 1474-029X
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Volume 66, Issue 1, p. 203-204
ISSN: 2161-7953
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Volume 58, Issue 1, p. 41-61
ISSN: 2161-7953
It is sometimes stated that the question of state succession to treaties is a question more of treaty interpretation than of the existence or otherwise of general rules of law concerning the fate of treaties upon change of sovereignty. In general terms the proposition is true: a customary rule favoring or negativing devolution would tend to be either excessively comprehensive or excessively restrictive with respect to the category of treaties whose fate is in issue. Many treaties, upon interpretation, might be found to be inapplicable under the new circumstances, while many others might be deliberately drafted in anticipation of a change of sovereignty, and might incorporate a clause providing for the solution of the problem. A study of concrete issues is thus, generally, more instructive in determining the effect of change of sovereignty upon treaties than is the enunciation of general principles of succession.
In: American journal of international law, Volume 58, p. 41-61
ISSN: 0002-9300
In: Proceedings of the annual meeting / American Society of International Law, Volume 54, p. 77-84
ISSN: 2169-1118
In: Modern age: a quarterly review, Volume 2, p. 186-189
ISSN: 0026-7457
In: The international & comparative law quarterly: ICLQ, Volume 6, Issue 1, p. 103-125
ISSN: 1471-6895
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Volume 50, Issue 2, p. 405-416
ISSN: 2161-7953
The question of recognition of the Central People's Republic of China, and the withdrawal of recognition of the Nationalist regime in Formosa, is from time to time a matter of moment in the internal politics of certain of the Pacific nations. Few of the proponents of recognition would advocate handing Formosa to the mainland government; they would prefer the island to be internationalized, neutralized, or made independent under United Nations auspices and guarantee. In the policy discussions on the question, various views of the legal competence of the Allies or of the United Nations to dispose of Formosa have been advanced. It is the purpose of this paper to examine these views in turn and indicate on which view the question of Formosa's future can be severed from the question of recognition.