Search results

Las autoras del artículo presentan una interpretación sobre los usos del odio en la vida política de la Argentina reciente. Específicamente apuntan a desentrañar en qué forma el odio funciona como factor estructurante del anti-populismo, a partir de la experiencia de la Alianza Cambiemos en el gobierno entre 2015 y 2019. La estrategia argumentativa avanza a partir de indicios −siguiendo la propuesta del paradigma indicial− que se toman de fragmentos de tres piezas discursivas de amplia repercusión pública. Y se utilizan herramientas teóricas ofrecidas por el psicoanálisis (tanto freudiano como lacaniano) así como por la propuesta de análisis del discurso de Laclau y Mouffe. ; The authors develop an interpretation of the uses of hatred in the recent Argentinean political life. They try to unravel how hatred works as a structuring factor of anti-populism, specifically considering the experience of the political alliance 'Let's Change' in power 2015-2019. The argumentative strategy follows the traces −according to the evidential paradigm− taken from three discursive pieces that had a major public impact. And it uses theoretical tools offered by psychoanalysis (in both Freudian and Lacanian versions) as well as the discourse analysis perspective of Laclau and Mouffe. ; As autoras do artigo apresentam uma interpretação sobre os usos do ódio na vida política da recente Argentina. Elas propõem desvendar como o ódio funciona como fator estruturante do anti-populismo a partir da experiência da "Alianza Cambiemos" no governo entre 2015 e 2019. A estratégia argumentativa avança a partir de pistas de fragmentos de três peças discursivas de ampla repercussão pública, que são analizadas a partir de uma proposta teórica desde a psicanálise (tanto freudiano quanto lacaniano), e tambem desde o análise do discurso de Laclau e Mouffe. ; Red de Carreras de Comunicación Social y Periodismo

This article presents an overview of Ernesto Laclau's theory of hegemony from his first work as co-author with Chantal Mouffe of Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics (1985) to his last work On Populist Reason (2005). To that end, this corpus is analyzed with theoretical tools from Lacanian psychoanalysis in order to locate the implicit postulates in Laclau's work and to organize his work into three main stages. We propose an interpretation of such theory from a psychoanalytic perspective through three key concepts: antagonism, dislocation, and heterogeneity.

Gramsci, Althusser, Foucault, and Derrida had all served as precedents of Laclau´s work. However, although Laclau liked to say that he was neither a "Freudian" nor a "Lacanian", but a "Laclausian", the key to his theoretical development lies in its psychoanalytic dimension. In this paper we therefore propose to address the centrality of psychoanalysis in the work of Laclau, from the notion of the subject that is internal to Freud´s developments. We know that throughout his work, from 1895-1939, Freud never explicitly addressed the question of the subject. If anything, he did so in a colloquial manner. However, an interpretation can be developed of what the notion of the subject entails in its relation to the development of his psychoanalytic theory. With respect to Laclau´s work, we consider that there are essentially three key Freudian texts at stake: On Narcissism: An Introduction, The Dream Work, and Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego. At times addressed directly by Laclau, and at times more surreptitiously, these texts show us Freud´s fundamental assumptions regarding the concept of identity, which are essential when considering Laclau´s way of thinking about politics. Here we will present a "Laclausian" reading of the three Freudian texts in question. Our interpretation is that they plot a course around the notion of the subject, which Laclau then carries to a radical proposition: locating psychoanalysis in the place where philosophy had traditionally placed ontology, that is, to propose psychoanalysis as a general ontology. ; Fil: Biglieri, Paula Andrea. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Instituto Interdisciplinario de Estudios e Investigación de América Latina; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina ; Fil: Perelló, Gloria. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Instituto Interdisciplinario de Estudios e Investigación de América Latina; Argentina