The indispensable guide to detecting and solving financial crime in the officeLow-level financial crimes are a fact of life in the modern workplace. Individually these crimes are rarely significant enough to warrant the hiring of professional investigators, but if left unchecked, small crimes add up to big losses. In companies without dedicated fraud investigators, detecting and solving low-level crimes generally falls to managers and internal auditors. Financial Crime Investigation and Control offers tips, tools, and techniques to help professionals who lack investigative experience stem the
Access options:
The following links lead to the full text from the respective local libraries:
Orientation: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused a 'coronafication' of research and academia, including the instrumentalisation of academic research towards the demands of society and governments. Whilst an enormous number of special issues and articles are devoted on the topic, there are few fundamental reflections on how the current pandemic will affect science and work and organisational psychology in the long run. Research purpose: The current overview, written by a group of members of the Future of Work and Organisational Psychology (FOWOP) Movement, focuses on the central issues relating to work and organisational psychology that have emerged as a result of the COVID-19 crisis. Motivation for the study: The study discusses the inability of dominant theories in work and organisational psychology to understand contemporary problems and the need to advance the theoretical realm of work psychology. We also discuss the need for pluralism in methodologies to understand the post-COVID-19 workplace, the urgency of attending to neglected voices and populations during the COVID-19 crisis and teaching during COVID-19. Research approach/design and method: This article uses conceptual argumentation. Main findings: The COVID-19 crisis forces work psychology to address at least its theorising, methods, unheard voices and teaching in the COVID-19 crisis. Practical/managerial implications: On the basis of this article, researchers and practitioners may be better aware of the neglected perspectives in the current pandemic. Contribution/value-add: This article adds to the understanding of the future directions for a sustainable Work and Organisational Psychology as an applied scientific discipline during and beyond the COVID-19 crisis.
ORIENTATION: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused a 'coronafication' of research and academia, including the instrumentalisation of academic research towards the demands of society and governments. Whilst an enormous number of special issues and articles are devoted on the topic, there are few fundamental reflections on how the current pandemic will affect science and work and organisational psychology in the long run. RESEARCH PURPOSE: The current overview, written by a group of members of the Future of Work and Organisational Psychology (FOWOP) Movement, focuses on the central issues relating to work and organisational psychology that have emerged as a result of the COVID-19 crisis. MOTIVATION FOR THE STUDY: The study discusses the inability of dominant theories in work and organisational psychology to understand contemporary problems and the need to advance the theoretical realm of work psychology. We also discuss the need for pluralism in methodologies to understand the post-COVID-19 workplace, the urgency of attending to neglected voices and populations during the COVID-19 crisis and teaching during COVID-19. RESEARCH APPROACH/DESIGN AND METHOD: This article uses conceptual argumentation. MAIN FINDINGS: The COVID-19 crisis forces work psychology to address at least its theorising, methods, unheard voices and teaching in the COVID-19 crisis. PRACTICAL/MANAGERIAL IMPLICATIONS: On the basis of this article, researchers and practitioners may be better aware of the neglected perspectives in the current pandemic. CONTRIBUTION/VALUE-ADD: This article adds to the understanding of the future directions for a sustainable Work and Organisational Psychology as an applied scientific discipline during and beyond the COVID-19 crisis.
In: Bal , P M , Alija , M , Bazana , S , Islam , G , Pérez-Nebra , A , Petrović , I , Pickett , J , Sanderson , Z , Sklaveniti , C , Tekeste , M & Vukelić , M 2021 , ' Covid-19 and the future of work and organisational psychology ' , SA Journal of Industrial Psychology , vol. 47 , a1854 . https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v47i0.1854
Orientation: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused a 'coronafication' of research and academia, including the instrumentalisation of academic research towards the demands of society and governments. Whilst an enormous number of special issues and articles are devoted on the topic, there are few fundamental reflections on how the current pandemic will affect science and work and organisational psychology in the long run. Research purpose: The current overview, written by a group of members of the Future of Work and Organisational Psychology (FOWOP) Movement, focuses on the central issues relating to work and organisational psychology that have emerged as a result of the COVID-19 crisis. Motivation for the study: The study discusses the inability of dominant theories in work and organisational psychology to understand contemporary problems and the need to advance the theoretical realm of work psychology. We also discuss the need for pluralism in methodologies to understand the post-COVID-19 workplace, the urgency of attending to neglected voices and populations during the COVID-19 crisis and teaching during COVID-19. Research approach/design and method: This article uses conceptual argumentation. Main findings: The COVID-19 crisis forces work psychology to address at least its theorising, methods, unheard voices and teaching in the COVID-19 crisis. Practical/managerial implications: On the basis of this article, researchers and practitioners may be better aware of the neglected perspectives in the current pandemic. Contribution/value-add: This article adds to the understanding of the future directions for a sustainable Work and Organisational Psychology as an applied scientific discipline during and beyond the COVID-19 crisis.
Orientation: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused a 'coronafication' of research and academia, including the instrumentalisation of academic research towards the demands of society and governments. Whilst an enormous number of special issues and articles are devoted on the topic, there are few fundamental reflections on how the current pandemic will affect science and work and organisational psychology in the long run. Research purpose: The current overview, written by a group of members of the Future of Work and Organisational Psychology (FOWOP) Movement, focuses on the central issues relating to work and organisational psychology that have emerged as a result of the COVID-19 crisis. Motivation for the study: The study discusses the inability of dominant theories in work and organisational psychology to understand contemporary problems and the need to advance the theoretical realm of work psychology. We also discuss the need for pluralism in methodologies to understand the post-COVID-19 workplace, the urgency of attending to neglected voices and populations during the COVID-19 crisis and teaching during COVID-19. Research approach/design and method: This article uses conceptual argumentation. Main findings: The COVID-19 crisis forces work psychology to address at least its theorising, methods, unheard voices and teaching in the COVID-19 crisis. Practical/managerial implications: On the basis of this article, researchers and practitioners may be better aware of the neglected perspectives in the current pandemic. Contribution/value-add: This article adds to the understanding of the future directions for a sustainable Work and Organisational Psychology as an applied scientific discipline during and beyond the COVID-19 crisis.
In: European journal of work and organizational psychology: the official journal of The European Association of Work and Organizational Psychology, Volume 28, Issue 3, p. 289-299
In: Bal , P M , Dóci , E , Lub , X , Van Rossenberg , Y G T , Nijs , S , Achnak , S , Briner , R B , Brookes , A , Chudzikowski , K , De Cooman , R , De Gieter , S , De Jong , J , De Jong , S B , Dorenbosch , L , Ghoreishi Galugahi , M A , Hack-Polay , D , Hofmans , J , Hornung , S , Khuda , K , Klamer , R , Mendy , J , Mol , S T , Navarro , J , Notelaers , G , Ossenkop , C , Pickett , J , Röllmann , L , Sanderson , Z , Sosnowska , J , Spanouli , A , Vantilborgh , T , Van Dijk , H & Van Zelst , M 2019 , ' Manifesto for the future of work and organizational psychology ' , European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology , vol. 28 , no. 3 , pp. 289-299 . https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2019.1602041
This manifesto presents 10 recommendations for a sustainable future for the field of Work and Organizational Psychology. The manifesto is the result of an emerging movement around the Future of WOP (see www.futureofwop.com), which aims to bring together WOP-scholars committed to actively contribute to building a better future for our field. Our recommendations are intended to support both individuals and collectives to become actively engaged in co-creating the future of WOP together with us. Therefore, this manifesto is open and never "finished." It should continuously evolve, based on an ongoing debate around our professional values and behavior. This manifesto is meant, first of all, for ourselves as an academic community. Furthermore, it is also important for managers, decision makers, and other stakeholders and interested parties, such as students, governments and organizations, as we envision what the future of WOP could look like, and it is only through our collective efforts that we will be able to realize a sustainable future for all of us.
In: Bal , P M , Dóci , E , Lub , X , Van Rossenberg , Y G T , Nijs , S , Achnak , S , Briner , R B , Brookes , A , Chudzikowski , K , De Cooman , R , De Gieter , S , De Jong , J , De Jong , S B , Dorenbosch , L , Ghoreishi Galugahi , M A , Hack-Polay , D , Hofmans , J , Hornung , S , Khuda , K , Klamer , R , Mendy , J , Mol , S T , Navarro , J , Notelaers , G , Ossenkop , C , Pickett , J , Röllmann , L , Sanderson , Z , Sosnowska , J , Spanouli , A , Vantilborgh , T , Van Dijk , H & Van Zelst , M 2019 , ' Manifesto for the future of work and organizational psychology ' , European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology , vol. 28 , no. 3 , pp. 289-299 . https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2019.1602041
This manifesto presents 10 recommendations for a sustainable future for the field of Work and Organizational Psychology. The manifesto is the result of an emerging movement around the Future of WOP (see www.futureofwop.com), which aims to bring together WOP-scholars committed to actively contribute to building a better future for our field. Our recommendations are intended to support both individuals and collectives to become actively engaged in co-creating the future of WOP together with us. Therefore, this manifesto is open and never "finished." It should continuously evolve, based on an ongoing debate around our professional values and behavior. This manifesto is meant, first of all, for ourselves as an academic community. Furthermore, it is also important for managers, decision makers, and other stakeholders and interested parties, such as students, governments and organizations, as we envision what the future of WOP could look like, and it is only through our collective efforts that we will be able to realize a sustainable future for all of us.
This manifesto presents 10 recommendations for a sustainable future for the field of Work and Organizational Psychology. The manifesto is the result of an emerging movement around the Future of WOP (see www.futureofwop.com), which aims to bring together WOP-scholars committed to actively contribute to building a better future for our field. Our recommendations are intended to support both individuals and collectives to become actively engaged in co-creating the future of WOP together with us. Therefore, this manifesto is open and never "finished." It should continuously evolve, based on an ongoing debate around our professional values and behavior. This manifesto is meant, first of all, for ourselves as an academic community. Furthermore, it is also important for managers, decision makers, and other stakeholders and interested parties, such as students, governments and organizations, as we envision what the future of WOP could look like, and it is only through our collective efforts that we will be able to realize a sustainable future for all of us. ; publishedVersion
This manifesto presents 10 recommendations for a sustainable future for the field of Work and Organizational Psychology. The manifesto is the result of an emerging movement around the Future of WOP (see www.futureofwop.com), which aims to bring together WOP-scholars committed to actively contribute to building a better future for our field. Our recommendations are intended to support both individuals and collectives to become actively engaged in co-creating the future of WOP together with us. Therefore, this manifesto is open and never "finished." It should continuously evolve, based on an ongoing debate around our professional values and behavior. This manifesto is meant, first of all, for ourselves as an academic community. Furthermore, it is also important for managers, decision makers, and other stakeholders and interested parties, such as students, governments and organizations, as we envision what the future of WOP could look like, and it is only through our collective efforts that we will be able to realize a sustainable future for all of us. ; peerReviewed
In: Bal , P M , Dóci , E , Lub , X , Van Rossenberg , Y G T , Nijs , S , Achnak , S , Briner , R B , Brookes , A , Chudzikowski , K , De Cooman , R , De Gieter , S , De Jong , J , De Jong , S B , Dorenbosch , L , Ghoreishi Galugahi , M A , Hack-Polay , D , Hofmans , J , Hornung , S , Khuda , K , Klamer , R , Mendy , J , Mol , S T , Navarro , J , Notelaers , G , Ossenkop , C , Pickett , J , Röllmann , L , Sanderson , Z , Sosnowska , J , Spanouli , A , Vantilborgh , T , Van Dijk , H & Van Zelst , M 2019 , ' Manifesto for the future of work and organizational psychology ' , European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology , vol. 28 , no. 3 , pp. 289-299 . https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2019.1602041
This manifesto presents 10 recommendations for a sustainable future for the field of Work and Organizational Psychology. The manifesto is the result of an emerging movement around the Future of WOP (see www.futureofwop.com), which aims to bring together WOP-scholars committed to actively contribute to building a better future for our field. Our recommendations are intended to support both individuals and collectives to become actively engaged in co-creating the future of WOP together with us. Therefore, this manifesto is open and never "finished." It should continuously evolve, based on an ongoing debate around our professional values and behavior. This manifesto is meant, first of all, for ourselves as an academic community. Furthermore, it is also important for managers, decision makers, and other stakeholders and interested parties, such as students, governments and organizations, as we envision what the future of WOP could look like, and it is only through our collective efforts that we will be able to realize a sustainable future for all of us.
In: Bal , P M , Doci , E , Lub , X , Van Rossenberg , Y G T , Nijs , S , Achnak , S , Briner , R B , Brookes , A , Chudzikowski , K , De Cooman , R , De Gieter , S , De Jong , J , De Jong , S B , Dorenbosch , L , Galugahi , M A G , Hack-Polay , D , Hofmans , J , Hornung , S , Khuda , K , Klamer , R , Mendy , J , Mol , S T , Navarro , J , Notelaers , G , Ossenkop , C , Pickett , J , Rollmann , L , Sanderson , Z , Sosnowska , J , Spanouli , A , Vantilborgh , T , Van Dijk , H & Van Zelst , M 2019 , ' Manifesto for the future of work and organizational psychology ' , European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology , vol. 28 , no. 3 , pp. 289-299 . https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2019.1602041
This manifesto presents 10 recommendations for a sustainable future for the field of Work and Organizational Psychology. The manifesto is the result of an emerging movement around the Future of WOP (see ), which aims to bring together WOP-scholars committed to actively contribute to building a better future for our field. Our recommendations are intended to support both individuals and collectives to become actively engaged in co-creating the future of WOP together with us. Therefore, this manifesto is open and never "finished." It should continuously evolve, based on an ongoing debate around our professional values and behavior. This manifesto is meant, first of all, for ourselves as an academic community. Furthermore, it is also important for managers, decision makers, and other stakeholders and interested parties, such as students, governments and organizations, as we envision what the future of WOP could look like, and it is only through our collective efforts that we will be able to realize a sustainable future for all of us.
This manifesto presents 10 recommendations for a sustainable future for the field of Work and Organizational Psychology. The manifesto is the result of an emerging movement around the Future of WOP (see www.futureofwop.com), which aims to bring together WOP-scholars committed to actively contribute to building a better future for our field. Our recommendations are intended to support both individuals and collectives to become actively engaged in co-creating the future of WOP together with us. Therefore, this manifesto is open and never 'finished.' It should continuously evolve, based on an ongoing debate around our professional values and behavior. This manifesto is meant, first of all, for ourselves as an academic community. Furthermore, it is also important for managers, decision makers, and other stakeholders and interested parties, such as students, governments and organizations, as we envision what the future of WOP could look like, and it is only through our collective efforts that we will be able to realize a sustainable future for all of us.
In: Bal , P M , Doci , E , Lub , X , Van Rossenberg , Y G T , Nijs , S , Achnak , S , Briner , R B , Brookes , A , Chudzikowski , K , De Cooman , R , De Gieter , S , De Jong , J , De Jong , S B , Dorenbosch , L , Galugahi , M A G , Hack-Polay , D , Hofmans , J , Hornung , S , Khuda , K , Klamer , R , Mendy , J , Mol , S T , Navarro , J , Notelaers , G , Ossenkop , C , Pickett , J , Rollmann , L , Sanderson , Z , Sosnowska , J , Spanouli , A , Vantilborgh , T , Van Dijk , H & Van Zelst , M 2019 , ' Manifesto for the future of work and organizational psychology ' , European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology , vol. 28 , no. 3 , pp. 289-299 . https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2019.1602041
Abstract this manifesto presents 10 recommendations for a sustainable future for the field of work and organizational psychology. The manifesto is the result of an emerging movement around the future of wop (see www.futureofwop.com), which aims to bring together wop-scholars committed to actively contribute to building a better future for our field. Our recommendations are intended to support both individuals and collectives to become actively engaged in co-creating the future of wop together with us. Therefore, this manifesto is open and never "finished." it should continuously evolve, based on an ongoing debate around our professional values and behavior. This manifesto is meant, first of all, for ourselves as an academic community. Furthermore, it is also important for managers, decision makers, and other stakeholders and interested parties, such as students, governments and organizations, as we envision what the future of wop could look like, and it is only through our collective efforts that we will be able to realize a sustainable future for all of us.
Employee silence, the withholding of work‐related ideas, questions, or concerns from someone who could effect change, has been proposed to hamper individual and collective learning as well as the detection of errors and unethical behaviors in many areas of the world. To facilitate cross‐cultural research, we validated an instrument measuring four employee silence motives (i.e., silence based on fear, resignation, prosocial, and selfish motives) in 21 languages. Across 33 countries (N = 8,222) representing diverse cultural clusters, the instrument shows good psychometric properties (i.e., internal reliabilities, factor structure, and measurement invariance). Results further revealed similarities and differences in the prevalence of silence motives between countries, but did not necessarily support cultural stereotypes. To explore the role of culture for silence, we examined relationships of silence motives with the societal practices cultural dimensions from the GLOBE Program. We found relationships between silence motives and power distance, institutional collectivism, and uncertainty avoidance. Overall, the findings suggest that relationships between silence and cultural dimensions are more complex than commonly assumed. We discuss the explanatory power of nations as (cultural) units of analysis, our social scientific approach, the predictive value of cultural dimensions, and opportunities to extend silence research geographically, methodologically, and conceptually.