Indian Legacy of Bureaucracy and Administration
In: Bureaucracy and Administration; Public Administration and Public Policy, p. 53-64
78 results
Sort by:
In: Bureaucracy and Administration; Public Administration and Public Policy, p. 53-64
In: International review of administrative sciences: an international journal of comparative public administration, Volume 67, Issue 2, p. 335-342
ISSN: 1461-7226
In: International review of administrative sciences: an international journal of comparative public administration, Volume 67, Issue 2, p. 335-342
ISSN: 0020-8523
In: International review of administrative sciences: an international journal of comparative public administration, Volume 66, Issue 4, p. 557-572
ISSN: 1461-7226
In: International review of administrative sciences: an international journal of comparative public administration, Volume 66, Issue 4, p. 557-572
ISSN: 0020-8523
In: International journal of public administration: IJPA, Volume 21, Issue 1, p. 87-108
ISSN: 0190-0692
In: International journal of public administration, Volume 21, Issue 1, p. 87-108
ISSN: 1532-4265
In: Indian journal of public administration, Volume 43, Issue 3, p. 261-274
ISSN: 2457-0222
In: The Indian journal of public administration: quarterly journal of the Indian Institute of Public Administration, Volume 43, Issue 3, p. 261-274
ISSN: 0019-5561
In: Indian journal of public administration, Volume 42, Issue 1, p. 1-15
ISSN: 2457-0222
In: Indian journal of public administration, Volume 36, Issue 3, p. 365-373
ISSN: 2457-0222
In: Indian journal of public administration, Volume 34, Issue 3, p. 441-453
ISSN: 2457-0222
In: The Indian journal of public administration: quarterly journal of the Indian Institute of Public Administration, Volume 34, Issue 3, p. 441
ISSN: 0019-5561
In: International sociology: the journal of the International Sociological Association, Volume 2, Issue 3, p. 301-314
ISSN: 1461-7242
Max Weber's comparative studies of the great non-European civilisations of India, China and Islam were, in spite of their breadth of content, focussed on the problem of the non-evolution of modern capitalism in them and most Webenan scholars did not, unfortunately, move far away from this. But the most mteresting topic of companson between China and India is not their common non-generation of capitalism but the totally different relation that evolved between the intellectuals and the state in each. A collaborative relation of the literati in the service of the state was evolved in China by the Han dynasty by a clever distortion of the Confucian ethic and it lasted with minor discontinuities until early this century. By contrast, the Indian Brahmin intellectuals gave only conditional support to the State, treating Dharma or Universal law as supreme and gave up hope of the impenal integration of India by the seventh century. Instead, they built a flexible pattern of cultural integration - based on Bhakti for contact with the masses and an all-India cultural elite for leadership - which has lasted all these centuries.
In: Indian journal of public administration, Volume 31, Issue 4, p. 1191-1203
ISSN: 2457-0222