Search results

Authoritarian neoliberalism : towards a new research agenda / Cemal Burak Tansel -- Authoritarian neoliberalism and the disciplining of labour / Mònica Clua-Losada and Olatz Ribera-Almandoz -- Commodified pacification : police, commercial security and the state / Kendra Briken and Volker Eick -- Bodies in resistance : conversations on gender, body politics and authoritarian neoliberalism / Wendy Harcourt -- The right to starve : hunger, discipline and labour market restructuring under authoritarian neoliberalism / Sébastien Rioux -- Urban transformation under authoritarian neoliberalism / Annalena di Giovanni -- From Mare Nostrum to Triton : humanitarian emergencies and neoliberal migration management in the Mediterranean / Luca Manunza -- Cease to exist? : the European "social" model and the hardening of "soft" EU law / Ian Bruff -- The authoritarian and disciplinary mechanism of reduced sovereignty in the EU : the case of Greece / Panagiotis Sotiris -- Antinomies of authoritarian neoliberalism in Turkey : the Justice and Development Party era / Baris Alp Özden, Ismet Akça and Ahmet Bekmen -- Resistance and passive revolution in Egypt and Morocco / Brecht De Smet and Koenraad Bogaert -- Klepto-neoliberalism : authoritarianism and patronage in Cambodia / Simon Springer -- Variegated neoliberalization as a function and outcome of neo-authoritarianism in China / Kean Fan Lim -- Postscript / Cynthia Enloe

This forum brings together critical engagements with Andreas Bieler and Adam David Morton's Global Capitalism, Global War, Global Crisis to assess the prospects and limits of historical materialism in International Studies. The authors' call for a 'necessarily historical materialist moment' in International Studies is interrogated by scholars working with historical materialist, feminist and decolonial frameworks in and beyond International Relations (IR)/International Political Economy (IPE). This introductory essay situates the book in relation to the wider concerns of historical materialist IR/IPE and outlines how the contributors assess the viability of Bieler and Morton's historical materialist project.

SUMMARY
Tansel's contribution to the debate dissects the concept of passive revolution and highlights the significance of understanding passive revolutions as concrete historical episodes of mobilisation and state formation.

AbstractThis article contributes to current debates in materialist geopolitics and contemporary IR theorising by restating the centrality of social forces for conceptualising geopolitics. It does so by offering a detailed conceptual reading of the corpus of the 'Eastern Question', which is composed of a series of political analyses written by Marx and Engels in the period of 1853–6. This archive presents unique analytical and conceptual insights beyond the immediate temporal scope of the issue. I unpack this argument in three movements. The article (i) offers an overview of the debates on materialist geopolitics; (ii) contextualises the historical setting of the 'Eastern Question' and critically evaluates the great powers' commitment to the Europeanstatus quo; and (iii) constructs an original engagement with a largely overlooked corpus to reveal the ways in which Marx and Engels demonstrated the interwoven relationship between domestic class interests, the state, and the international system. I maintain that revisiting the 'Eastern Question' corpus (i) bolsters the existing materialist frameworks by underscoring the role of class as an analytical category; (ii) challenges an important historical pillar of the balance of power argument; and (iii) empirically strengthens the burgeoning scholarship in international historical sociology.