The following links lead to the full text from the respective local libraries:
Alternatively, you can try to access the desired document yourself via your local library catalog.
If you have access problems, please contact us.
56 results
Sort by:
"Using real-world examples and vivid illustrations drawn from other disciplines, An Introduction to Moral Philosophy challenges preconceived notions about morality and demonstrates why ethics matters. From respected philosopher and writer Jonathan Wolff, this edition features a thoughtful and contemporary treatment of the ethics of gender, race, and non-Western moral philosophy, engaging narrative introductions to moral theories and the thinkers behind them"--
In: Norton Global Ethics Series v.0
In: Key contemporary thinkers
Robert Nozick's Anarchy, State and Utopia is one of the works which dominates contemporary debate in political philosophy. Drawing on traditional assumptions associated with individualism and libertarianism, Nozick mounts a powerful argument for a minimal nightwatchman' state and challenges the views of many contemporary philosophers, most notably John Rawls. Jonathan Wolff's new book is the first full-length study of Nozick's work and of the debates to which it has given rise. He situates Nozick's work in the context of current debates and examines the traditions which have influenced his thought. He then critically reconstructs the key arguments of Anarchy, State and Utopia, focusing on Nozick's Doctrine of Rights, his Derivation of the Minimal State, and his Entitlement Theory of Justice. The book concludes by assessing Nozick's place in contemporary political philosophy.
This fresh and timely book argues that we can detach Marx the critic of current society from Marx the prophet of future society, and that he remains the most impressive critic we have of liberal, capitalist, bourgeois society. Wolff also shows that the value of the 'great thinkers' does not depend on their views being true, but on other features such as their originality, insight, and systematic vision. For these reasons, and more, Wolff shows us why Marx stillrichly deserves to be read.
In: Critical review of international social and political philosophy: CRISPP, Volume 23, Issue 5, p. 564-583
ISSN: 1743-8772
In: Social philosophy & policy, Volume 34, Issue 1, p. 164-185
ISSN: 1471-6437
Abstract:Advocates of social equality need to develop an account of the society they favor. I have argued elsewhere that social equality should be conceived negatively: in terms of opposition to asymmetric and alienating relations such as hierarchy, domination and social exclusion, rather than in terms of a positive model of equality. This essay looks in detail at social exclusion, or rather "differential social inclusion," and especially at the mechanisms that create exclusion and bind excluded groups together, and the consequent effects these mechanisms have on the reinforcement of inequality of opportunity and failure of social solidarity. Possible policies, such as improved social mobility, assertive self-affirmation, validation of subcultures, integration, and the creation of a large public sector are considered as possible responses to differential social inclusion in order to move closer to the idea of a society of equals.
In: Medicine and Social Justice, p. 71-78
Introduction of the book: Ethics and Public Policy: A Philosophical Inquiry (Routledge, 2011), by Jonathan Wolff. Published with the author's and Routledge (Taylor & Francis Group) permissions. ; El texto corresponde a la introducción del libro de Jonathan Wolff, Ethics and Public Policy: A Philosophical Inquiry (Routledge, 2011). La presente traducción y su original se publican con permiso del autor y de la editorial Routledge (Taylor & Francis Group).
BASE
In: Social justice and public policySeeking fairness in diverse societies, p. 16-31
In: Public policy research: PPR, Volume 14, Issue 2, p. 126-135
ISSN: 1744-540X
The regulation of recreational drugs makes no philosophical sense, argues Jonathan Wolff, but, in bringing their perspective to public policy debates, philosophers have to do more than start from a position that is abstracted from day‐to‐day reality.