Search results

The article is devoted to the history of the emergence and formation of the institution of trust property in relation to various legal systems. The purpose of such a historical analysis of the institution of trust property is to find a possible place of this legal institution in domestic law, because trust property is a relatively new legal construct for Ukrainian law. The relevance of the article is to study the possibility of using the Anglo-American Trust Institute in Ukraine. The object of the study of this article is the legal relations arising from the institute of trust property. Methods of historicism, method of logic, method of analysis, method of synthesis, method of systematic research, and comparative-legal method were used in the study. The authors concluded that the institution of trust property goes back to one of the branches of English law. At the same time, the institution of trust is not inherent in the domestic legal system. However, since the 1990s, the domestic legislator has tried several times to introduce the relevant institution into Ukrainian legislation. So far, all of these attempts have failed.

Civil law plays an important social role, namely, the regulation of property and personal non-property relations, which all members of society are without exception. The Civil Code is often called the economic constitution of the state. Accordingly, the quality of civil law ultimately depends on the well-being of each individual. In addition, the improvement of the current legislation of Ukraine is a prerequisite for deepening the integration processes with the European Community. Thus, timely alignment of current legislation with current realities, part of which is the recoding of civil law, is certainly an important function of every state. The object of the study is the public relations that arise in connection with the recoding of civil law. The subject of the study was the normative acts of Ukraine, international normative acts, civil law doctrine. Scientific research methods such as analysis method, synthesis method, induction methods, and deduction method, and special-legal research methods, such as legal-dogmatic method and method of interpretation of legal norms, were used for the study. It can be conclude that Articles 387 and 391 of the Civil Code of Ukraine should be supplemented by the notions of the vindication and negatoria claims. In addition, there is a problem of competition vindication, restitution and condictia in Art. 1212 of the Civil Code of Ukraine. Secondly, the mechanism for transferring the rights and obligations of the buyer should be more explicit. Thirdly, there is a need to improve the statute of limitations according to the civil law of Ukraine.

The urgency of the research of the topic of the article is that according to the legislation of Ukraine the marriage ceremony is not the basis for the occurrence of rights and duties of a spouse to a woman and a husband, except for cases when the religious ritual of marriage took place before the creation or restoration of state bodies of registration of acts of civil status. The object of the research article was the problem of recognition of religious marriage at the state level. The authors argue that the state could recognize religious marriages as evidence and a form of detection and recognition of mutual responsibilities between a man and a woman who, for whatever reason, did not register their marriage with the state body of the National Civil Registration Authority, but live by one family and act in the interests of children. The article states that in many countries a religious marriage has the same legitimate power as the marriage registered with the relevant state authorities.The authors of the article in the conclusions suggest amending the legislation of Ukraine to recognize a religious marriage as valid, with the condition that the spouse will subsequently register it in the state bodies of the National Civil Registration Authority. Subsequent registration shall take place not later than five years after the marriage was made through a religious rite during the period of the status of the temporarily occupied territories, or not later than two years after the abolition of the status of the temporarily occupied territories. ; La urgencia de la investigación del tema del artículo es que, de acuerdo con la legislación de Ucrania, la ceremonia matrimonial no es la base para el cumplimiento de los derechos y deberes de un cónyuge para una mujer y un esposo, excepto en los casos en que el ritual religioso El matrimonio tuvo lugar antes de la creación o restauración de los organismos estatales de registro de actos de estado civil. El objeto del artículo de investigación fue el problema del reconocimiento del matrimonio religioso a nivel estatal. Los autores argumentan que el estado podría reconocer los matrimonios religiosos como evidencia y una forma de detección y reconocimiento de responsabilidades mutuas entre un hombre y una mujer que, por cualquier motivo, no registraron su matrimonio ante el organismo estatal de la Autoridad Nacional de Registro Civil. pero vive de una sola familia y actúa en interés de los niños. El artículo establece que en muchos países un matrimonio religioso tiene el mismo poder legítimo que el matrimonio registrado con las autoridades estatales pertinentes.Los autores del artículo en las conclusiones sugieren enmendar la legislación de Ucrania para reconocer un matrimonio religioso como válido, con la condición de que el cónyuge lo registre posteriormente en los organismos estatales de la Autoridad Nacional de Registro Civil. El registro posterior tendrá lugar a más tardar cinco años después de que el matrimonio se haya realizado a través de un rito religioso durante el período del estado de los territorios ocupados temporalmente, o no más tarde de dos años después de la abolición del estado de los territorios ocupados temporalmente. ; За законодавством України обряд шлюбу не є підставою для виникнення в жінки і чоловіка прав і обов'язків подружжя, крім випадків, коли релігійний обряд шлюбу відбувся до створення або відновлення державних органів реєстрації актів цивільного стану.При цьому, держава могла б визнавати релігійні шлюби як доказ і форму виявлення і визнання взаємних обов'язків між чоловіком і жінкою, які з якихось причин не зареєстрували свій шлюб у державному органі РАЦС, однак проживають однією сім'єю та діють в інтересах дітей.У багатьох країнах релігійний шлюб має таку саму легітимну силу, як і зареєстрований у відповідних державних органах шлюб.Автори статті пропонують внести зміни до законодавства України, якими визнати релігійний шлюб дійсним, з умовою того, що подружжя в подальшому зареєструє його в державних органах РАЦС. Подальша реєстрація відбувається не пізніше п'яти років після укладення шлюбу шляхом релігійного обряду під час дії статусу тимчасово окупованих територій або не пізніше двох років після скасування статусу тимчасово окупованих територій.

The urgency of the research of the topic of the article is that according to the legislation of Ukraine the marriage ceremony is not the basis for the occurrence of rights and duties of a spouse to a woman and a husband, except for cases when the religious ritual of marriage took place before the creation or restoration of state bodies of registration of acts of civil status. The object of the research article was the problem of recognition of religious marriage at the state level. The authors argue that the state could recognize religious marriages as evidence and a form of detection and recognition of mutual responsibilities between a man and a woman who, for whatever reason, did not register their marriage with the state body of the National Civil Registration Authority, but live by one family and act in the interests of children. The article states that in many countries a religious marriage has the same legitimate power as the marriage registered with the relevant state authorities. The authors of the article in the conclusions suggest amending the legislation of Ukraine to recognize a religious marriage as valid, with the condition that the spouse will subsequently register it in the state bodies of the National Civil Registration Authority. Subsequent registration shall take place not later than five years after the marriage was made through a religious rite during the period of the status of the temporarily occupied territories, or not later than two years after the abolition of the status of the temporarily occupied territories.