Search results

Frontmatter -- Contents. -- List of Figures -- List of Tables -- Acknowledgments. -- One. Introduction -- PART I: FRAMES ON EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND THE EUROPEAN UNION IN THE UNITED KINGDOM, GERMANY, AND SPAIN -- Two. Ways of Seeing European Integration -- Three. Good Reasons for Attitudes toward European Integration -- Four. Journalists and European Integration -- PART II: NATIONAL CULTURES AND FRAMES ON EUROPEAN INTEGRATION -- Five. Spain: Europe as a Mirror with Two Reflections -- Six. West Germany: Between Self-Doubt and Pragmatism -- Seven. East Germany: A Different Past, a Different Memory -- Eight. The United Kingdom: Reluctant Europeans -- Nine. Frames and Attitudes toward European Integration: A Statistical Validation -- Ten. Conclusions -- Appendix 1. Selection and Distribution of Respondents, and the Interviewing Process -- Appendix 2. Newspaper Selection, Sampling, and Coding Procedures for Editorials and Opinion Pieces -- Appendix 3. Frames on European Integration: A Discriminant Analysis, by City -- Appendix 4. Sources for Part II: Novels, History Textbooks, and Head of State Addresses -- Notes -- References -- Index -- Princeton Studies in Cultural Sociology

The literature on ethnicity and nationalism notes the centrality of language in group formation. Developments connected to globalization have simultaneously propitiated learning more than one language and the emergence of post‐national and pan‐ethnic identifications. This article brings the literature on ethnicity and nationalism to bear on the analysis of these changes to assess the causal relationship between multilingualism (ML) and European identification (EI). Sociology and social psychology provide solid theoretical arguments for why they should be related. The article tests this relationship with Eurobarometer data from 2010. I show that ML has a causal impact on EI and that interaction helps mediate this relationship. The effect of language on EI is modest, however, and interaction does not appear to be the main mechanism mediating it. The article concludes with speculation as to the role of low relative cross‐national mobility in Europe as the main explanation for some of the findings.