Search results

In September 1961, Socialist Yugoslavia formally established a partnership with states in the Global South called the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM). Socialist Yugoslavia and the Non-Aligned Movement understands the NAM as a site for transnational cultural exchange, and explores the movement's decolonial alternatives to global inequalities.

Croatia celebrated a decade of membership in the European Union by joining the euro currency and the Schengen Area of free movement on January 1, 2023. At the same time, however, the country is struggling with the economic, social, and political consequences of its semi-peripheral status. A series of reform challenges remain unsolved, including the continued dominance of clientelistic networks. Amid a set of overlapping crises, from the global financial meltdown to the COVID-19 pandemic, the country has seen a revival of conservative and patriarchal ideologies.

Book review

This paper explores, through interviews and archive material, key actors in George Soros' Open Society Foundations in the post-Yugoslav space as "flex actors" or "flexians" who generate, occupy and transform new emergent spaces of power, advancing their own personal agendas as much, if not more, than organisational agendas. The focus is on three pivotal 'moments': the break-up of Yugoslavia and the wars in the early 1990s; the changes in Croatia and Serbia after Tuđman and Milošević in 1999-2000; and the current confluence of austerity and new movement activism in the European periphery. The Soros "flexians" acted as key definers of conflict and post-conflict spaces in emerging and unstable discursive, institutional and political environments, with their claims to intellectual superiority, cosmopolitan sentiment and profound anti-nationalism serving to both define the contours of political opposition and reduce its broader resonance and impact. Later, a turn to 'policy' actually expanded the political opportunity structures for these "flexians" who often became key players in a contradictory 'modernisation' project emphasising the 'backwardness' of the region, or at least its political leadership, in relation to an imagined West and, at the same time, arguing that only domestic intellectual elites such as themselves could translate the values of modernity into implementable schemes. In the current 'moment', "flex actors" in the Foundations are negotiating new and complex relationships with movements against commodification, crony capitalism, the erosion of the right to public space and 'neo-liberal' austerity politics.

This paper explores, through interviews and archive material, key actors in George Soros' Open Society Foundations in the post-Yugoslav space as 'flex actors' or 'flexians' who generate, occupy and transform new emergent spaces of power, advancing their own personal agendas as much, if not more, than organisational agendas. The focus is on three pivotal 'moments': the break-up of Yugoslavia and the wars in the early 1990s; the changes in Croatia and Serbia after Tucman and Milosevic in 1999-2000; and the current confluence of austerity and new movement activism in the European periphery. The Soros 'flexians' acted as key definers of conflict and post-conflict spaces in emerging and unstable discursive, institutional and political environments, with their claims to intellectual superiority, cosmopolitan sentiment and profound anti-nationalism serving to both define the contours of political opposition and reduce its broader resonance and impact. Later, a turn to 'policy' actually expanded the political opportunity structures for these 'flexians' who often became key players in a contradictory 'modernisation' project emphasising the 'backwardness' of the region, or at least its political leadership, in relation to an imagined West and, at the same time, arguing that only domestic intellectual elites such as themselves could translate the values of modernity into implementable schemes. In the current 'moment', 'flex actors' in the Foundations are negotiating new and complex relationships with movements against commodification, crony capitalism, the erosion of the right to public space and 'neo-liberal' austerity politics. Adapted from the source document.