Search results

Reproduced from typewritten copy. ; "Novyi Vostok, No. 2. 1922, pp. 606-612; this declaration was translated from Chinese into Russian by A.E. Khodorov." ; Mode of access: Internet.

In the history of Chinese people staying on Russian territory there is still a lot of questions and areas for investigation and clarification. It is clear that the interaction between the Russians and the Chinese had a direct impact on the further development of Russian- Chinese relations. One of the unique event in the history of Russian-Chinese relations was the 6th Congress of the Communist Party of China, held in Moscow region in the Pervomayskoe village. It was the only Congress of the CPC held abroad and the Congress, where Marxism was adopted by the Chinese Communists, and later it was spread to China. In fact, the Congress was the starting point of the process of Marxism Sinification. The delegates of the 6th Congress included the Chinese immigrants who worked and studied in the USSR. They are directly influenced by the October Revolution which changed their way of thinking, these were people who perceived the ideas of Marxism-Leninism early, they organized the holding of this congress, where examined in detail the possible ways of the Chinese revolution. By adopting Marxism- Leninism and starting its propaganda, they have made a significant contribution to its spread in China in the form of Sinificated Marxism. The further destiny and life of overseas Chinese were different, but almost all of them were closely linked to the Chinese revolution and the transformation process in the Chinese society in the middle of the 20th century. The authors described in detail the composition of the participants and organizers of the Congress, analyzed the content of speeches and reports of the head of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China at the congress, considered the further destiny of the participants and delegates.

In the article, political principles of the Communist party of Japan are analyzed. The work is based on the documents of the Communist party of Japan, books, articles and interviews of leaders of the CPJ. Historical roots of their views as well as relation of CPJ's principles to main ideologies are considered. CPJ's reform plans are assessed.Key words: Japan, communism, Communist party of Japan, democratic socialism. ; В статье проведен анализ программных установок Коммунистической партии Японии (КПЯ). Работа основывается на программных документах партии, книгах, статьях и интервью лидеров КПЯ, рассматриваются исторически корни их взглядов, устанавливается связь идей КПЯ с основными идеологическими системами современности, дается оценка планов реформ Коммунистической партии Японии.Ключевые слова: Япония, коммунизм, Коммунистическая партия Японии, демократический социализм.

The article is a brief comparison of the documentation system of the Communist Party ruling Poland from 1944 to 1989 and in Kazakhstan from 1918 to 1991. Despite considerable geographical remoteness, there are strong similarities between them in terms of party organisation, office rules and provisions regulating archives. This was caused by the reflection of Soviet models in communist Poland after 1944. The regaining of sovereignty by Poland in 1990 and independence by Kazakhstan in 1992 led to the transfer of documentation from party archives to the state archive service in both countries. As a result, it was possible to study and make them publicly available.

В статье анализируется современная отечественная и зарубежная историография (2000-е гг. – настоящее время) взаимоотношений Коммунистического Интернационала – международной организации, объединявшей коммунистические партии в 1919–1943 гг., и Коммунистической партии Испании (КПИ) в период от ее основания (1921 г.) до окончания Гражданской войны в стране (1939 г.). Рассмотрены мнения историков из России, Испании, Великобритании, США и Италии. Выбор обусловлен тем, что именно в указанных странах за последние десятилетия был опубликован ряд интересных работ по данной тематике. По мнению лидеров Коммунистического Интернационала, Испания не входила в число тех стран, где были созданы предпосылки для осуществления революции на протяжении всего срока деятельности этой международной организации, за исключением периода Гражданской войны (1936–1939 гг.). Поэтому большинство исследований, рассматриваемых в статье, касаются в основном данного хронологического этапа. Историки расширяют диапазон тем, в первую очередь это касается попыток переосмысления событий Гражданской войны в Испании и политики Народного фронта. Многие прежде неисследованные сюжеты подвергаются глубокому анализу благодаря открытию архивов. В статье рассматриваются вопросы о полномочиях Коминтерна по отношению к КПИ и Испанскому правительству, главным образом, во время Гражданской войны; о помощи Испании, оказываемой Коминтерном и Советским правительством и о планах И.В. Сталина по установлению союзнических отношений с Францией, Великобританией и США в этот же период. Делаются выводы о том, что по данным вопросам существуют различные, в том числе абсолютно противоположные, мнения, что подтверждает актуальность данной темы, а также о том, что современные российские историки чаще придерживаются мнения о прямой зависимости КПИ от решений Коминтерна, принимаемых главным образом И.В. Сталиным, зарубежные же историки, напротив, приходят к выводам об определенной самостоятельности испанских коммунистов, в том числе и в период Гражданской войны.
The article analyzes modern Russian and foreign historiography (2000s – present day), devoted to the relationship of the Communist International (the Comintern, an international organization that united the communist parties in 1919–43) and the Communist Party of Spain (the PCE) from its founding (1921) till the end of the Spanish Civil War (1939). The opinions of historians from Russia, Spain, Great Britain, the USA, and Italy are considered. The choice of countries is due to the fact that a number of works on this topic have been published there over the past decades. According to the leaders of the Communist International, Spain was not among the countries in which the preconditions for a revolution were created throughout the entire period of the activity of this international organization, with the exception of the period of the Civil War (1936–39). Therefore, most of the studies taken into account in the article relate mainly to this period. Historians are expanding the range of their research, first of all, in the area that concerns attempts to rethink the events of the Spanish Civil War and the politics of the Popular Front. Many previously unexplored questions and topics are subject to significant analysis thanks to the opening of archives. The article deals with several questions: the powers of the Comintern in relation to the PCE and the Spanish government, mainly during the Civil War; assistance to Spain provided by the Comintern and the Soviet government; the plans of Joseph Stalin to establish allied relations with France, Great Britain, and the USA in the same period. Conclusions are drawn that there are various opinions on these issues, including contrary ones, which indicates the continued relevance of this topic, and that the contemporary Russian historians more often adhere to the opinion that the CPE was directly dependent on the decisions of the Comintern taken mainly by J. Stalin, while foreign historians, on the contrary, conclude that the Spanish Communists were independent to a certain extent and preserved their independence during the Civil War as well.