Search results

The emergence of an expanded notion of citizenship -- cultural citizenship -- is examined. The development of citizenship rights is cumulative & uneven. While extension of social/welfare rights has recently been stymied, new cultural citizenship rights, including the rights to symbolic presence, dignifying representation, propagation of identity, & maintenance of lifestyles, have emerged. Global trends responsible for the emergence of interest in cultural citizenship in the contemporary era are highlighted: (1) weakening of the state; (2) the welfare system crisis; (3) the waning of classes; (4) proliferation of communication media; & (5) formation of new social & cultural movements. The application of these trends to the emergence of cultural rights & their claimants in Australia is discussed. Adapted from the source document.

Conceptualizing spatial citizenship / Euikyung Shin and Sarah Witham Bednarz -- Geography as a social study : its significance for civic competence / Stephen J. Thornton -- Geography, capabilities and the educated person / David Lambert -- The spatial production and navigation of vulnerable citizens / Sandra J. Schmidt -- Citizenship education in a spatially enhanced world / Sarah Witham Bednarz and Robert S. Bednarz -- Rediscovering the local : collaborative, community maps for civic awareness / Todd Kenreich -- Geotechnologies and the spatial citizen / Tom Baker, Mary Curtis, and Lisa Millsaps -- Cultivating student citizens : using critical pedagogy of place curriculum to enhance spatial thinking, civic engagement, and inquiry through student-generated topics / M. Beth Schlemper and Victoria C. Stewart -- Informed citizenry starts in the preschool and elementary grades-and with geography / Elizabeth R. Hinde -- Spatial citizenship in secondary geography curriculum / Injeong Jo -- Spatial citizenship in geography/social studies teacher education / E-yung S

Purpose: This paper introduces Stroud's 'Linguistic Citizenship', a concept committed to democratic participation, to voice, to the heterogeneity of linguistic resources and to the political value of sociolinguistic understanding. Approach: It first outlines Linguistic Citizenship's links with the ethnographic sociolinguistics inspired by Hymes, and then turns to language and language education in England. Findings: The discourses of language and citizenship currently dominating the UK are very much at odds with Stroud's conception, but the sociolinguistic citizenship outlined by Stroud is very well suited to the multilingualism of everyday urban life, and it complements a range of relatively small, independently funded educational initiatives promoting similar values. Their efforts are currently constrained by issues of scale and sustainability, although there was a period from the 1960s to the 80s when sociolinguistic citizenship was addressed within English state schooling. Practical implications: Sociolinguistic citizenship may at present find its most sustainable support in the collaboration between universities and not-for-pro.

Citizenship is not a static concept. It is not inherently national & exclusively nation-centered understandings of citizenship are too narrow for the current era of globalization. However, the claim that citizenship has been denationalized or postnationalized still needs to be proven. Four meanings of citizenship are reviewed in the context of denationalized citizenship -- legal status, enjoyment of rights, active engagement in the life of a polity, & public identity. Postnational citizenship fits least with citizenship as legal status, but better with the other meanings, especially with citizenship as collective identity & solidarity. With the decentralization of the nation-state as the locus of collective institutional & associative life, denationalized citizenship is a desired good. A commitment to pluralization & even beyond, to postcitizenship, is discussed. 61 References. M. Pflum

Cover -- EU CITIZENSHIP -- Copyright -- Table of Contents -- Introduction -- 1 Concepts of citizenship and identity: National vs. postnational paradigms -- Introduction -- Ethnicity, nationality and citizenship -- Universalist conception of citizenship -- Identity politics -- The emergence of European subjectivity -- Citizenship as discursive practice: The postmodern concept of citizenship -- Globalization and postnational model of citizenship -- 2 The European Union as a postnational political community -- Introduction -- Different paradigms of Europe and European citizenship -- The European Union: Towards the postmodern political community -- The spiritual and cultural dimension of Europe -- The idea of a European identity -- The question of European identity in the light of Brexit and migration crisis -- 3 The Postmodern Europe: Democracy to come -- Introduction -- The postmodern conception of law -- The postmodern Europe: Problems and perspectives -- Europe's migration crisis: A challenge to democracy -- Conclusion -- Bibliography -- Name Index -- Subject Index.

Using the distinction that Richard Ashley and Rob Walker drew in 1990 between two possible critical responses to crisis and the question of sovereignty, this article argues that two strands of thought can be identified, each producing a different understanding of what it means to become a citizen in Ireland. One strand articulates citizenship in terms of sovereign autonomous subjectivity, and thus in terms of horizontal or territorial relations between here and there, us and them, inside and outside. The other strand (re)articulates citizenship in terms of ambiguous paradoxical subjectivity that challenges the modern framing of the politics of citizenship as necessarily needing to be conceptualized in terms of absolute space. This divergence is explored through the 2004 Irish Citizenship Referendum. The concept of citizenship as "trace" is introduced in an attempt to capture how citizenship is reconceptualized differently in the second strand. It is argued that understanding this divergence is necessary in order to consider how classical conceptions of time and space are specifically integral to structures of sovereign power and how perspectives that take these as their starting point fail to account for the increasing emphasis on the nonsovereign manner in which citizenship is being experienced vis-à-vis migration.

AbstractAlthough the concept of citizenship is a widely used theoretical framework within political philosophy, its use in the field of mental health remains underexplored. Within this context, citizenship emphasises the social inclusion and participation of people who are marginalized and offers a more social and relational view of services and support for people with mental health problems than has been common in mental health systems of care. At the same time, however, the citizenship approach has operated in the context of systems of care in the United States that favour highly individualized conceptions of, and approaches to, care, and these systems of care operate in the social and political context of highly individualized concepts of the citizen. In this article building on the work of other citizenship scholars, we argue that a collective form of citizenship, grounded in the 5Rs framework, holds the individual and collective in creative tension. Furthermore, the paper applies this model to the domain of mental health, where people are treated in individualistic ways and experience marginalisation, making the collective dimension imperative and promoting participation, empowerment and the contribution for social change to people with mental health problems. Our theoretical framework of collective citizenship, while geared toward the needs of persons with mental health problems, also contributes to recent citizenship theory on the inclusion of marginalized, stigmatised, and excluded groups. We illustrate the application of this approach through an ethnographic‐participant observation case study of a collective citizenship group with which we are associated.

Frontmatter -- Contents -- Preface -- Acknowledgments -- CHAPTER ONE What Is Socratic Citizenship? -- CHAPTER TWO PUBLIC OPINION, MORAL TRUTH, AND CITIZENSHIP -- CHAPTER THREE MORALITY, INDIVIDUALISM, AND POLITICS The -- CHAPTER FOUR CONFLICT, INTEGRITY, AND THE ILLUSIONS OF POLITICS -- CHAPTER FIVE CITIZENSHIP VERSUS PHILOSOPHY -- Conclusion -- Notes -- Index

The paper begins with an examination of three ideal types citizenship which are not necessarily mutual exclusive. The first type is national citizenship, typically associated with ethno-nationalism. The second form is social citizenship or 'welfare citizenship' refers to the creation of social rights and is closely connected to civil-society institutions rather than to the state or market. The third form of citizenship identifies the citizen with participation in the work force emphasizing self-reliance and autonomy. In this discussion, I argue that with economic globalization and the development of neo-liberal strategies the various forms of citizenship have converged towards a new model of passive citizenship in which the state is or has withdrawn from commitment to full employment and the provision of social security, especially universal provision of welfare services, and civil-society institutions have been eroded. The result is the emergence of the apolitical,isolated citizen as consumer. The fourth model of citizenship presupposes a consumer society, a weak state and the decline of civic institutions, where the passive citizen becomes a consumer of privatized goods and services. The rise of a fourth model of citizenship – the consumer-citizen – can be interpreted as a logical consequence of financialization.1
1 Some aspects of this chapter first appeared in Bryan S. Turner (2010), 'Ralf Dahrendorf on Citizenship and Life Chances', Citizenship Studies, 14 (2): 237–43.

Contemporary models of citizenship are critiqued in an attempt to conceptualize a more comprehensive notion of European citizenship. Four models of citizenship are identified: a rights-based model linked to liberalism; a duties-based model connected with conservatism; a participation-based model associated with democratic radicalism; & an identity-based model related to communitarianism. Arguing that issues of citizenship are subverted by discourses of nationalism, a postnational notion that emphasizes a citizen's rights, duties, participation, & identity is presented. In contemporary Europe, the traditional notion of citizenship based on rights & participation has been replaced by a supranational concept that privileges cultural identity of diversity. Consequently, a postnational notion of identity that reveres human rights, the environmnent, democracy, & multiculturalism is needed to contest current trends. 1 Figure, 64 References. Adapted from the source document.