Search results

Cette étude vise à révéler le niveau épistémologique où la critique critique à la recherche, contrairement à la littérature critique qui sepenche sur le plan esthétique, ainsi que de préciser comment le fonctionnement de la critique critique, et qui ne peuvent en l'absence de critique de la parole de la littérature, il est tenu d'examiner la responsabilité de trésorerie préparé par le critique littéraire et lessoumettre niveau Alabstimologi, grâce à l'approche de responsabilisation -alodah et Alajra- suivi d'une critique de la littérature, ce qui signifie que la critique critique exige l'acceptation des perceptions initiales de la littérature méthodologique critique, ne pouvait souffrir d'une étude systématique en utilisant la méthodologie, car sa mission espère que le programme afin de poursuivre le critique à toutes les étapes T Ancien conçu connaissance, comme une critique de critique découle de l'idée que le discours de la critique doit être clarifiée et le dialogue et l'éclairage, et cherche à évaluer la connaissance du critique de la littérature en décrivant les questions monétaires et réfléchir et donner une perception de la méthodologie d'enquête critique.

Frontmatter -- Contents -- Preface -- 1 Prologue to a Generic Event -- 2 The Scene of Dual Territoriality -- 3 The Scene of Situational Laterality -- 4 The Scene of Archival Specificity -- 5 The Three Pillars of Diaspora Criticism -- 6 In Lieu of an Epilogue -- Bibliography -- Index

This chapter describes the advent of welfare state criticism as elite criticism in the Danish political debate. It focuses on three of the most prolific contemporary critics of the welfare state: founder of the libertarian populist party Fremskridtspartiet, Mogens Glistrup; Marxist and economist Jørgen Dich; and Bertel Haarder, member of the Danish Liberal Party. The chapter highlights how welfare state criticism as elite criticism came about in processes of conceptual circulation and transformation, which, at times, eluded individual intentions and control but nonetheless signified an ideational convergence. While many politicians, scholars, and intellectuals from different ideological camps voiced welfare state criticism as elite criticism, some played more crucial role than others in framing debate on crisis of the welfare state. Welfare state criticism as elite criticism was constructed in processes of circulation through which social commentators picked up, appropriated, and transformed rhetorical styles and political concepts to fit several highly diverse political agendas.

The aim of this paper is to describe how Catalan humor works in the context of political TV satire, where everyday references mutate in order to show hidden meanings and parallel purposes. Using mainly pragmatic and discourse analysis as tools, we will try to decipher conversational exchanges that create hilarity and promote political critique. Tokens of linguistic (or verbal) humor as well as referential (or situational) humor will be analyzed, trying to show the range of their social and political implications. Our major tenet is that political satire operates as a two-sided process: on one side, it promotes communication within a specific social network, on the other, it affords criticism and self-criticism to emerge, which serve also as a useful evaluation of everyday public themes.

Abstract
This chapter on economic criticism begins with a review of recent scholarly contributions from historians that have shaped conversations on the relationship between economics and culture. A discussion of recent standout monographs in economic criticism follows; the chapter concludes by reviewing two recent anthologies of economic critical scholarship.

AbstractThis chapter on economic criticism assesses two recent books on the changing state of global capitalism. It then moves to a consideration of recent debates over neoliberalism as a category for thinking the relationship between economics and culture, before turning to a critical assessment of recent public-choice scholarship on state capacity and religious toleration.

The painter Francis Bacon (1909-1992) did a series of interviews during his career with David Sylvester. Some of them are presented in Interviews with Francis Bacon: 1962-1979, by David Sylvester, published in 1980. I’m both interested in the art and also pretty clueless, but when I’m interested, I don’t mind being clueless. (In fact, life … Continue reading “Destructive Criticism … Is Certainly the Most Helpful Criticism”
The post "Destructive Criticism … Is Certainly the Most Helpful Criticism" first appeared on Conversable Economist.