Search results
Filter
113 results
Sort by:
Checking availability at your location
This book is also available at your library:
Book(print)#22007
W kre̜gu gender
In: Prace naukowe Uniwersytetu Śla̜skiego w Katowicach 2519
In: Psychologia
Checking availability at your location
This book is also available at your library:
Checking availability at your location
This book is also available at your library:
Checking availability at your location
This book is also available at your library:
Checking availability at your location
This journal is also available at your library: |
electronic
print
Checking availability at your location
This book is also available at your library:
Checking availability at your location
This book is also available at your library:
Checking availability at your location
This book is also available at your library:
Checking availability at your location
This book is also available at your library:
Checking availability at your location
This book is also available at your library:
Checking availability at your location
This book is also available at your library:
Checking availability at your location
This book is also available at your library:
Checking availability at your location
This book is also available at your library:
Book(print)#142004
Gender perspektiva u nastavi: mogućnosti i poticaji
Checking availability at your location
This book is also available at your library:
Open Access#152017
Borba za sustavno vrednovanje i rangiranje spolne jednakosti: slučaj Europskog instituta za spolnu jednakost ; The Struggle of Benchmarking and Ranking Gender Equality: The Case of the European Institute for Gender Equality
Cilj je ovog članka istražiti konceptualizaciju sustavnog vrednovanja, rangiranja i dobrih praksi razmjene alata u okviru politika spolne jednakosti u Europskoj Uniji. U prvom dijelu članka sagledavaju se meke pravne mjere primijenjene u kontekstu suradnje među vladama. Utemeljena na ekstenzivnoj literaturi, u ovoj se studiji te mjere razmatraju kao oblik akademskog znanja koje se na različite načine primjenjuje u okviru javnih politika. Nadalje, u članku se kritiziraju ti alati javnih politika kroz različite varijable koje mogu spriječiti upotrebu znanja. U drugom dijelu članka usredotočuje se na Otvorenu metodu koordinacije i na ulogu Europskog instituta za spolnu jednakost (EIGE) u odnosu na politike spolne jednakosti. Empirijski dio ovog članka fokusira se na kritiku EIGE-ovog Eksternog evaluacijskog izvješća i na različite konceptualizacije upotrebe akademskog znanja koje su predstavljene u ovom kontrolnom dokumentu. Kao takav, ovaj članak nastoji pridonijeti novoj konceptualizaciji tehnokratskih mjera sustavnog vrednovanja, rangiranja i dobrih praksi razmjene unutar visoko ideologiziranog područja politika spolne jednakosti. ; The aim of this article is to explore the conceptualisation of benchmarking, ranking and good practice sharing tools within European Union gender equality policymaking. In the first part, the article looks at these soft law measures applied within intergovernmental cooperation. Stemming from the extensive body of literature, the study approaches these measures as a form of scientific knowledge, which is diversely applied within policymaking. Next, the article directs various points of criticism at these policymaking tools through different variables that may hinder knowledge use. The second section of this article further focuses on the Open Method of Coordination and the role of the European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE) in relation to gender equality policies. The empirical part of this article is focused on the criticism of EIGE's External Evaluation Report and the different conceptualisations of scientific knowledge use which are presented within this audit document. As such, this article aims to contribute to a new conceptualisation of the technocratic tools of benchmarking, ranking and good practice sharing within the highly ideological area of gender equality policies.
BASE