Search results

In the present article the author tried to analyze the processes underway in the world political arena, give his assessments concerning some new global challenges and threats in the post-COVID period. He made an attempt to give a brief review of the current role and place of Uzbekistan in the regional and international politics.

Introduction. The article attempts to analyze the attempts of political leaders of various types to build political communications in the new social reality - on the Internet. The material of the study was taken from the storytelling of the three leaders in social networks during the first attempts to create elements of symbolic politics. In the process of analyzing this narration, we asked ourselves: - How much is the traditional image of a particular political leader related to his reflection on social networks? The relevance of the author's approach lies in the analysis of storytelling as a tool for the formation of symbolic politics and social reality. Political leaders moved into a virtual environment following their target audiences.Methodology and sources. The methodological basis of the work is verification on practical material of socio-philosophical concepts and models of political analysts, cultural scientists, sociologists (P. Shtompki, V.A. Yadova, O.Yu. Malinova, G.L. Tulchinsky and others). The article uses narratives obtained from open access social networks. To clarify the formation of social reality, a comparative analysis of the narratives of public leaders regarding the creation of a space of symbolic politics was carried out.Results and discussion. As a result of the study, theoretical models that describe the behavioral patterns of political leaders in the information society were verified. In the modern information society, the main focus is transferred to social networks, where the target audience of political figures spend their time. Political leaders follow their target audience in different ways by showing their presence on social networks, both quantitative and qualitative. As a result of the study, the distinctive features of storytelling of public politicians, the similarities and differences in the technologies for creating a full-fledged image of a leader in the mass consciousness of the target audience, the similarities and differences between the image of a political leader taking shape in traditional media and on the Internet are clarified.Conclusion. In 2018, we observe the phenomenon of the entry into the space of social networks of politicians with the aim of event formation of elements of symbolic politics. In the study of storytelling as a process of forming public communications, the roles of sources and actors are defined. In today's digital society, social networks play a critical role in the processes of generating social reality. The mechanisms for the formation of narratives may require additional research, but now we can determine their impact on the political, socio-cultural and business environment. ; Введение. В статье предпринята попытка проанализировать попытки политических лидеров различных типов выстраивать политические коммуникации в условиях новой социальной реальности – в сети Интернет. В качестве материала исследования были взяты элементы сторителлинга трех лидеров в социальных сетях периода первых попыток создания элементов символической политики. В процессе анализа этой наррации мы задавались вопросом – насколько связан традиционный образ конкретного политического лидера с его отражением в социальных сетях? Актуальность авторского подхода заключается в анализе сторителлинга как инструмента формирования символической политики и социальной реальности. Политические лидеры перешли в виртуальную среду вслед за своими целевыми аудиториями.Методология и источники. Методологическая основа работы – верификация на практическом материале социально-философских концептов и моделей политических аналитиков, культурологов, социологов (П. Штомпки, В. А. Ядова, О. Ю. Малиновой, Г. Л. Тульчинского и др.). В статье используются нарративы, полученные из социальных сетей с открытым доступом. Для выяснения формирования социальной реальности был проведен сравнительный анализ нарративов публичных лидеров в части создания пространства символической политики.Результаты и обсуждение. В результате исследования были верифицированиы теоретические модели, описывающие поведенческие паттерны политических лидеров в информационном обществе. В современном информационном обществе основное внимание переносится в социальные сети, где и проводят свое время целевые аудитории политических деятелей. Политические лидеры следуют за своей целевой аудиторией, по-разному проявляя свое присутствие в социальных сетях, как количественное, так и качественное. В результате проведенного исследования выяснены отличительные особенности сторителлинга публичных политиков, сходство и различия в технологиях создания полноценного образа лидера в массовом сознании целевой аудитории, сходство и отличия между имиджем политического лидера, складывающемуся в традиционных СМИ и в интернете.Заключение. Мы наблюдаем в 2018 г. феномен вхождения в пространство социальных сетей политиков с целью событийного формирования элементов символической политики. В процессе исследования сторителлинга как процесса формирования публичных коммуникаций определены роли источников, акторов. В современном цифровом обществе социальные сети играют важнейшую роль в процессах генерации социальной реальности. Механизмы формирования нарративов, возможно, потребуют дополнительного исследования, но уже сейчас можно определить их влияние на политическую, социально-культурную и деловую среду.

The article reveals the question of international economic relations of the Republic of Uzbekistan. The policy of Uzbekistan on the development of international trade and economic cooperation. And also, the economic relations of Uzbekistan and Russia. Economic relations with the countries Iran and Azerbaijan.

This article presents material associated with the semantic reconstruction of the images of Russian political figures as viewed by young students, based on material from an empirical study conducted in 2018. While conducting research, students attending higher and secondary professional education institutions in Primorsky Krai were surveyed. Such an undertaking as a semantic reconstruction of the images of Russian political figures allowed for identifying both the substantive and the structural properties of each image. The categorical structure of the semantic space of views on political leaders was defined. The general categories – selected based on associations – primarily include "leadership", "moral and human qualities", "intellectual", "negative personal traits" and "political symbols". The aforementioned categories, which were selected from the material on associations, bear specific similarities with those categories which were established using factor analysis of semantic differential data. The general categories for evaluating leaders based on semantic differential data include, first of all, "intellectual and leadership qualities", "greed and hypocrisy – kindness", "aggression and rudeness – handsomeness". Within the structure of the category "negative personal traits" we can trace subcategories which are inverse to (or which mirror) the positive traits (stupidity is the opposite of intelligence and wisdom, aggressiveness is contrary to kindness). Additionally the substantive characteristics of the images of Russia's four leading political figures (according to young people) were identified. A comparative analysis of the images of Russian politicians shows that positive personal traits, according to the respondents, are most apparently exhibited by Vladimir Putin and Ramzan Kadyrov. Incidentally both of them possess so called "leadership qualities" and high moral characteristics. Such data corresponds with modern Russian society's demand for a competent, strong-willed and righteous leader. All in all the identified categories and groups of traits allow for reconstructing the organizational structure of subjective experience in perceiving political leaders, as well as the political thinking of young people. The data acquired in this study might be useful in the consequent study of the modern Russian people's political awareness, and they could be used by political leaders and parties in conducting practical operations.