THE MULTI-PARTY SYSTEM IN KERALA
In: The Indian political science review, Volume 2, Issue 8, p. 170-185
ISSN: 0019-6126
35173 results
Sort by:
In: The Indian political science review, Volume 2, Issue 8, p. 170-185
ISSN: 0019-6126
In: The Indian political science review, Volume 8, Issue 2, p. 170-185
ISSN: 0019-6126
In: http://mdz-nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:12-bsb00050225-7
Peter J. Potichnyi ; Zsfassung in dt. und engl. Sprache ; Volltext // Exemplar mit der Signatur: München, Bayerische Staatsbibliothek -- 4 Z 68.247-1992,1/14
BASE
In: Review of African political economy, Volume 19, Issue 54
ISSN: 1740-1720
In: Parliamentary affairs: a journal of comparative politics
ISSN: 1460-2482
In: The world today, Volume 17, p. 217-226
ISSN: 0043-9134
In: Parliamentary affairs: a journal of representative politics, Volume 39, Issue 2, p. 214
ISSN: 0031-2290
In: Parliamentary affairs: a journal of representative politics, Volume 39, p. 214-220
ISSN: 0031-2290
Translated by C. G. Brand. Cabinet formation procedures and experiences; the Queen's role; some reference to other Western democracies.
In: American political science review, Volume 84, Issue 4, p. 1077-1101
ISSN: 0003-0554
World Affairs Online
In: International affairs: a Russian journal of world politics, diplomacy and international relations, Issue 8, p. 3-19
ISSN: 0130-9641
World Affairs Online
In: International affairs: a Russian journal of world politics, diplomacy and international relations, p. 3-19
ISSN: 0130-9641
Discussion by representatives of new political parties on their foreign policy views; Soviet Union.
In: Punjab journal of politics: journal of the Department of Political Science, Volume 26, Issue 2, p. 47-62
ISSN: 0253-3960
What explains affective polarization among voters and societal groups? Much of the existing literature focusing on mass political polarization in modern democracies originates in the US, where studies have shown that, while ideological separation has grown, political conflict increasingly reflects social identity divisions rather than policy disagreements, resulting in affective polarization. We focus on explaining such polarization in a multi-party context. Drawing on social identity theory and intergroup threat theory, we hypothesize that individuals who perceive an intergroup threat show stronger intergroup differentiation and increased affective polarization. We analyze the influence of perceived threat on affective polarization drawing on two large-scale representative surveys in Sweden (N = 1429 and 1343). We show that individual-level affective polarization is related to perceived intergroup threats among the voters in both studies, measuring affective polarization using social distance, negative trait attribution, and party like-dislike ratings.
BASE
SSRN
What explains affective polarization among voters and societal groups? Much of the existing literature focusing on mass political polarization in modern democracies originates in the US, where studies have shown that, while ideological separation has grown, political conflict increasingly reflects social identity divisions rather than policy disagreements, resulting in affective polarization. We focus on explaining such polarization in a multi-party context. Drawing on social identity theory and intergroup threat theory, we hypothesize that individuals who perceive an intergroup threat show stronger intergroup differentiation and increased affective polarization. We analyze the influence of perceived threat on affective polarization drawing on two large-scale representative surveys in Sweden (N = 1429 and 1343). We show that individual-level affective polarization is related to perceived intergroup threats among the voters in both studies, measuring affective polarization using social distance, negative trait attribution, and party like-dislike ratings.
BASE