Search results
Filter
Format
Type
Language
More Languages
Time Range
1123 results
Sort by:
Attitude polarization
In: Sonderforschungsbereich 504, Rationalitätskonzepte, Entscheidungsverhalten und Ökonomische Modellierung 07,66
Rethinking polarization
In: National affairs, Volume 41, p. 86-100
ISSN: 2150-6469
World Affairs Online
Polarization versus democracy
In: Journal of democracy, Volume 30, Issue 3, p. 20-32
ISSN: 1045-5736
World Affairs Online
The polarization trap
In: Studies in conflict & terrorism, Volume 37, Issue 6, p. 492-522
ISSN: 1057-610X
World Affairs Online
The Polarization Trap
In: Studies in conflict & terrorism, Volume 37, Issue 6, p. 492-522
ISSN: 1057-610X
Party Polarization in Congress
In: Perspectives on politics: a political science public sphere, Volume 8, Issue 4, p. 1242-1243
ISSN: 1537-5927
Party Polarization in Congress
In: Political science quarterly: PSQ ; the journal public and international affairs, Volume 124, Issue 3, p. 551
ISSN: 0032-3195
World Affairs Online
Party Polarization in Congress
In: Political studies review, Volume 10, Issue 1, p. 158-159
ISSN: 1478-9299
Party Polarization in Congress
In: Congress and the presidency: an interdisciplinary journal of political science and history, Volume 37, Issue 1, p. 92-93
ISSN: 0734-3469
Partisan Polarization and Legislators' Agendas
In: Polity: the journal of the Northeastern Political Science Association, Volume 46, Issue 3, p. 430-448
ISSN: 0032-3497
Partisan polarization in legislators' roll call voting is well established. In this article, we examine whether partisan and ideological differentiation extends to legislators' agendas (i.e., the issue content of the bills and resolutions they introduce and cosponsor). Our analyses, focusing on the 101st-110th Congresses, reveal that differentiation occurs both across and within parties (e.g., Democrats and Republicans tend to pursue different issues in their legislative activity, as do moderate and more ideologically extreme copartisans), but that these differences are not typically large in magnitude and did not increase between the late 1980s and late 2000s. These findings suggest that the dynamics of polarization differ for roll call voting and agenda activities in ways that have important implications for our assessments of its consequences. In particular, they highlight that the polarization that has occurred is less a result of differing priorities between Democrats and Republicans and more a function of different preferences on those priority issues. This differentiation may bubble up in part from the true preferences of the rank-and-file, but it is also likely a function of the polarized choices that are presented to them on roll call votes. . Adapted from the source document.
Polarization and interstate conflict
In: Journal of peace research, Volume 45, Issue 2, p. 261-282
ISSN: 0022-3433
World Affairs Online
Does Gerrymandering Cause Polarization?
In: American journal of political science: AJPS, Volume 53, Issue 3, p. 666-680
ISSN: 0092-5853