Search results

학위논문 (석사)-- 서울대학교 대학원 : 행정학과(정책학전공), 2012. 2. 금현섭. ; 본 연구는 국회 법안 심사 소위원회를 분석대상으로 삼아, 국회의 법안 심의가 어떠한 행태를 기반으로 이루어지는지 살펴보았다. 최근의 국회 의사결정에 관한 연구가 대부분 상임위원회 위주였기에 실질적인 법안심의 과정을 살펴보기 힘들다는 한계를 극복하기 위해 500쪽 가량의 소위원회 회의록을 Atlas.ti 프로그램을 이용한 분석을 통해 의원들의 행태를 파악하였다. 법률안 통과에 있어 비교적 큰 차이를 보이고 있는 보건복지위원회와 산업자원위원회를 분석대상으로 삼았는데, 분석결과 두 위원회의 행태적 차이는 예상과는 다르게 크지 않았다. 두 위원회 모두 전문성 범주가 압도적으로 많았으며, 대표성, 타협성, 당파성의 행태로 의사결정의 특징이 나타나 전반적인 차이는 존재하지 않았지만 보건복지위원회는 전문성과 당파성이 상대적으로 높았으며, 산업자원위원회는 대표성과 타협성이 상대적으로 높은 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 분석은 의회의 위원회 의사결정이 정당의 이익을 대변하기 위한 것이라는 정당이익이론과 의원 본인의 정치적 자산을 취득하기 위한 것이라는 이익분배이론과는 조금 다른 결과로 상임위원회라는 회의체가 본회의에 대한 정보제공을 목적으로 이루어지기 때문에 의원들의 의사결정 행태의 바탕이 전문성이라는 정보가설이론이 본 연구에서는 크게 지지되었다. 그리고 이와 같은 행태가 법률안의 의사결정에는 어떠한 영향을 미치는지 실증분석을 통해 살펴본 결과 당파성과 대표성은 법률안의 의결에 부정적인(-) 영향을 미쳤으며, 전문성은 긍정적인(+) 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 하위범주별로 로짓분석을 수행했을 때, 통계적으로 유의미한 결과가 나온 것은 정부의 정책에 대한 비판과 반대가 높을 때 의사결정이 이루어지지 않는다는 것이다. 의원들은 강한 비판과 반대를 통해 정부를 압박하지만 정부측에서 이를 수용하지 않을 경우, 의안의 의결은 대부분 이루어지지 않았다. 이는 법안 심의에 있어서도 정부의 영향력은 사실상 막강하다는 것을 보여주는 것으로 의원들이 심의하고 결정하는 회의체라 할지라도 실제 집행을 담당하는 정부의 동의 없이는 의안의 통과는 어려웠다. 또한 위원회별로 각 행태요인의 특성이 있는지 상호작용 효과에 관한 분석을 실시하였으나 통계적으로 유의미한 차이는 도출되지 않았다. 결국 의원들의 행태적 특성이 상임위원회가 다루는 정책의 내용에 따라 크게 달라지지 않았다는 것이다. 하지만, 의안 심의에 있어 산업자원위원회보다 보건복지위원회가 훨씬 더 활발한 회의를 진행하고 있었으며, 한 의안에 대한 심의기간과 질의 빈도가 훨씬 높은 것은 확인하였고, 한 의안에 대한 심의기간이 길기 때문에 상대적으로 다루는 의안수가 적을 수밖에 없는 것도 확인할 수 있었다. 결론적으로 17대 국회 법안심의 의사결정이 소위원회 중심으로 이루어지는 것을 확인할 수 있었으며, 일반적인 법안심의에 있어서는 당파성보다 전문성이 훨씬 많이 나타나고 있으며 행정부의 영향이 실제적으로는 크게 미치고 있는 것으로 나타났다. ; This study has investigated the behavioral basis for the congressional deliberation of bills, targeting the congressional subcommittee for the deliberation of bills. In order to overcome the limit in investigating the process of practical deliberation of bills because most recent studies on the congressional decision-making was based on the National Assembly Standing Committee, about 500-page minute of the subcommittee was analyzed using Atlas.ti program and then the behaviors of the members of the National Assembly were investigated. The Health and Welfare Committee and the Industry Advisory Committee were targeted because of comparatively large difference in the passage of the bills between them. As a result of the analysis, the behavioral difference between them were not so different from the expectation. Both committees had overwhelmingly large amount of professional categories, and the attributes of their decision-making appeared as the behaviors of representativeness, compromise, and partiality. Thus, there was no difference in general, but the professionalism and the partiality of the Health and Welfare Committee, and the representativeness and the comprise of the Industry Advisory Committee appeared relatively high. This analysis was slight different from the theory of party's interest, 'the decision-making by the committee represents the party's interest', and the theory of interest distribution, 'the decision-making by the committee is for the member to acquire their own political asset'. Because, the board aims to provide the information for the full-dress session, the theory of information hypothesis, 'the behaviors of the congressmen are based on the professionalism' was greatly supported in this study. And then, as a result of an empirical analysis for investigating how these behaviors influenced the decision-making on the bills, the partiality and the representativeness had a negative effect and the professionalism had a positive effect on the vote for the bills. The statistically significant result was produced when a logit analysis by subcategory was conducted. This implies that the decision is difficult to be made when the criticism and the opposition to the government is strong. When observing the minute of subcommittees, the administrators from the government are likely participated in the subcommittee as attendees not as doers, but they, in general, are more influential than the members. The members of the national assembly oppressed the government through powerful criticism and opposition. However, if the government did not accommodate these criticism and opposition, in most cases, the vote for the bills were not materialized. This implies that the government has an enormous effect on the deliberation of bills. In fact, the passage of the bills was difficult without an agreement by the government in charge of practical implementation, even though the members deliberate and decide in the board. In addition, an analysis of the effect of interaction was conducted to find out whether there were some attributes of each behavioral factors, but no statistically significant difference has been derived. Resultingly, the behavioral attributes of the member did not significantly vary in accordance with the contents of the policies being dealt by the standing committees. However, it was identified that in respect of the deliberation of bills, than the Industry Advisory Committee, the Health and Welfare Committee were proceeding meetings more actively, the deliberation period was longer and the quality of the deliberation were hight and the number of the bills dealt with was comparatively smaller, due to it's long period for the deliberation of bills. In conclusion, it was identified that the decision-making on the bills at the 17th National Assembly was centered on the subcommittees, and in respect of the deliberation of general bills, the professionalism appeared more often than the partiality, and the administration was significantly influential to that. ; Master

학위논문 (석사)-- 서울대학교 대학원 : 외교학과, 2012. 2. 신욱희. ; 본 연구는 구조적 환경과 행위자의 선택, 그리고 구조와 선택을 매개한 정책결정자의 인식의 상호작용을 통해 1960년대 중반 북한 자주외교노선의 결정요인을 분석하고자 한다. 정권수립 이후 북한은 동아시아에 형성된 냉전 구조 속에서 사회주의 대국이었던 소련과 중국에게 편승함으로써 상대적으로 "밖"의 문제보다 "안"의 문제에 집중할 수 있었다. 김일성은 경쟁세력을 차례로 숙청하며 권력을 집중화할 수 있었고, 단일지도체제를 구축할 수 있었다. 하지만 김일성은 1956년 소련공산당 제20차 대회 이후 전개된 흐루시초프의 신노선에 소극적으로 대응하였고, 이에 정권의 중심에서 밀려나 있던 소련파와 연안파의 불만을 촉진시켰다. 김일성에 대한 개인숭배 심화와 당 지도부의 경제, 인사 정책에 불만을 가졌던 경쟁 세력은 외부의 힘을 이용하여 당의 노선 변화를 도모하고자 하였고, 이러한 계획은 1956년 8월 전원회의를 통해 현실화되었다. 하지만 사전에 계획을 인지하고 있었던 김일성의 방해로 인해 연안파와 소련파의 계획은 실패하였고, 주도자들은 종파주의자로 낙인 찍혀 대규모 숙청의 대상이 되었다. 하지만 김일성의 과도한 권력집중을 일탈로 우려한 소련과 중국은 미코얀과 펑더화이를 파견하여 북한의 내정에 간섭하였다. 이로써 김일성의 반(反)대국주의 의식은 심화되었고, 이후 중소분쟁이 본격적으로 시작하면서 국내정치에서 외부의 힘을 제거하고 단일지도체제를 구축하였다. 1960년대가 시작되면서 중국과 소련의 갈등은 이념적 차원을 넘어 정책적 차원으로 확대되었으며 북한은 국내외의 문제에 사로잡힌 양국의 관심에서 벗어나 본격적으로 대외관계를 주도할 수 있었다. 이전까지 북한의 대외관계는 소련과 중국의 압도적인 영향력 아래 있었지만 상호방위조약을 통해 양국과 대등한 관계를 형성함은 물론 제3세계 국가들과의 대외관계를 적극적으로 확대하면서 자주외교노선의 기틀을 마련하였다. 소련공산당 20차 대회와 중소분쟁으로 이어지는 사회주의 진영의 구조적 환경의 변화 속에서 김일성을 비롯한 당 지도부는 역사적으로 형성된 반(反)대국주의 인식으로 인해 어느 한 국가에 대한 일방적인 편승을 배제한 채 1960년대 중반 대외적으로 자주외교노선을 공식화할 수 있었다. ; The purpose of this paper is to analyse North Korea's foreign policy, called the self-reliance foreign policy, which was implemented in the mid-1960s. Among the various factors that can influence foreign policy, this paper concentrates on the interaction of structure, decision maker's intention, and perception or values according to Carlsnaes' dynamic model of analysing foreign policy change. After nation building, there have been two critical structural diversions in the Communist bloc—the Twentieth Party Congress of the CPUS in February 1956 and the Sino-Soviet conflict that began in the late 1950s. In each event, Kim Il-sung attempted to increase DPRK's policy-making autonomy and exclude the political leverage of two brotherhood countries, Soviet and China, in the domestic politics. Kim's strong anti-great power chauvinism was strengthened from his past experiences, and it was reinforced by two countries' intervention in 1956. These two primary elements had influenced Kim Il-sung's foreign policy decision making during his reign. In the late 1950s, Kim and his partisans concluded the intra-party conflict with two rival groups, the Soviet Korean and Yan'an groups. These events completely monopolized power in domestic politics. As the dispute between China and Soviet aggravated in the 1960s, North Korea could secure its policy-making autonomy from these two countries. It had become more equal that North Korea extended its diplomatic relations to the Third World nations in this period. On the basis of the consecutive policies, North Korea could implement the self-reliance foreign policy in around 1965. ; Master

The focus of this research is on Finland's role in Soviet Union's calculation of its foreign policy between 1920 and 1930. This was the first decade of both Finnish independence and of Soviet power in Russia. This book answers questions about the objectives of Soviet foreign policy in Finland, on the contacts used by the Soviet legation to obtain information, and on how well the Soviets understood Finland's objectives. People interested in Finland and in Russian perspectives with regards to foreign policy and neighbouring countries will find much new in this book because it relies on formerly unpublished Russian archival material to form the basis for charting Soviet objectives in Finland. The book shows that the Soviets primarily observed Finland in a larger regional context along with other states on its borders in the Baltic Sea region. The global objectives of the revolution and the Soviet Union, but also the domestic political situation in both countries, are reflected on this framework. The period was characterized by forced collectivization in the Soviet Union and, in Finland, by the rise of the right-wing Lapua Movement that emerged at the onset of the Great Depression, laying the foundations for the most severe crisis in the relations during 1929–1930 when the issues surrounding these events destabilized simultaneously the society and political decision-making in both countries

Preliminary Material /Asbjørn Eide , Jakob Th. Möller and Ineta Ziemele -- The Right to Peace Milestones in the Development of International Humanitarian Law /Daniel Thürer -- Post-War American International Law Scepticism: The International Criminal Court, Stockholm 1924 /Mark Weston Janis -- Peace as a Human Right: The Jus Cogens Prohibition of Aggression /Alfred de Zayas -- The Human Right to Peace /William A. Schabas -- Security and Human Rights in the Regulation of Private Military Companies: The Role of the Home State /Francesco Francioni -- The United Nations and Human Rights What Makes Democracy Good? /Lyal S. Sunga -- Is the United Nations Human Rights Council Living Up to the International Community's Expectations? /Markus G. Schmidt -- The UN Human Rights Council: The Perennial Struggle between Realism and Idealism /Bertrand G. Ramcharan -- Eight UN Petitions Procedures: A Comparative Analysis /Jakob Th. Möller -- The Legal Status of Views Adopted by the Human Rights Committee – From Genesis to Adoption of General Comment No. 33 /Geir Ulfstein -- Winter Break 2010: A Week in the Life of a Special Rapporteur /Martin Scheinin -- Legal and Judicial Shortcomings of the Surrogate State of "UNMIKISTAN" /Margrét Heinreksdóttir -- The Right to Inclusive Education for Children with Disabilities – Innovations in the CRPD /Arnardóttir Arnardóttir -- Human Rights at the Regional Level The Council of Europe: A Champion in Monitoring Implementation of Human Rights Standards? /Petter F. Wille -- Flexibilising the Modes of Amending the European Convention on Human Rights: An Idea for a 'Statute' for the European Court /Krzysztof Drzewicki -- Strengthening of the Principle of Subsidiarity of the European Convention on Human Rights /Björg Thorarensen -- Presumption of Convention Compliance /Davíð Þór Björgvinsson -- The Right to Adequate Judicial Reasoning /Ragnar Aðalsteinsson -- Dialogue Between States and International Human Rights Monitoring Organs – Especially the European Commission Against Racism and Intolerance /Lauri Hannikainen -- How Old Are You? Age Discrimination and EU Law /Allan Rosas -- NHRIs in the European Union: Status Quo Vadis? /Morten Kjærum and Jonas Grimheden -- Selected Examples of the Contemporary Practice of the Inter-American System in Confronting Grave Violations of Human Rights: United States and Colombia /Diego Rodríguez-Pinzón -- Indigenous Peoples and Minorities Prevention of Discrimination, Protection of Minorities, and the Rights of Indigenous Peoples: Challenges and Choices /Asbjørn Eide -- Minority Protection in the African System of Human Rights /Michelo Hansungule -- Indigenous Peoples on the International Scene: A Personal Reminiscence /Lee Swepston -- Indigenous Peoples and the Right to Development /Rainer Hofmann and Juri Alistair Gauthier -- Principal Problems Regarding Indigenous Land Rights and Recent Endeavours to Resolve Them /Erica-Irene A. Daes -- Traditional Knowledge of Indigenous Peoples: Preserve or Protect? – That's the Question! /Mpazi Sinjela -- Redefining Sovereignty and Self-Determination through a Declaration of Sovereignty: The Inuit Way of Defining the Parameters for Future Arctic Governance /Timo Koivurova.

The focus of this research is on Finland's role in Soviet Union's calculation of its foreign policy between 1920 and 1930. This was the first decade of both Finnish independence and of Soviet power in Russia. This book answers questions about the objectives of Soviet foreign policy in Finland, on the contacts used by the Soviet legation to obtain information, and on how well the Soviets understood Finland's objectives. People interested in Finland and in Russian perspectives with regards to foreign policy and neighbouring countries will find much new in this book because it relies on formerly unpublished Russian archival material to form the basis for charting Soviet objectives in Finland. The book shows that the Soviets primarily observed Finland in a larger regional context along with other states on its borders in the Baltic Sea region. The global objectives of the revolution and the Soviet Union, but also the domestic political situation in both countries, are reflected on this framework. The period was characterized by forced collectivization in the Soviet Union and, in Finland, by the rise of the right-wing Lapua Movement that emerged at the onset of the Great Depression, laying the foundations for the most severe crisis in the relations during 1929–1930 when the issues surrounding these events destabilized simultaneously the society and political decision-making in both countries.

This book [Mediatized power and the return of the political] describes Finnish decision-makers' relationship with the media. It is based on surveys in 2009 and 2019. In 2009 there were 419 and in 2019 484 respondents, all of them having an influential position in some of the eight societal sectors covered in the study. The results show a moderate change from a consensus-oriented and networking decision-making culture towards a more ideologic and power-based way of negotiating. However, it seems that this has not affected how open or transparent the negotiation-processes are or how prone the decision-makers are to leak confidential information. The decision-makers' relationship with media publicity has become more professional and strategic. The results point to an increased role of social media in communications management while the role of the news media seems to be diminishing. Even though the decision-makers view publicity as an even more risky and strategic arena of political struggle than they did before, they also seem now acknowledge more clearly the rational aspects of journalism. The self-reported role of media publicity as a source of personal authority has somewhat diminished while there seems to be no change in how prone the decision-makers think they are for the impacts of media publicity.