Search results

[8], 116, [2] p. ; Dedication signed: Christopher Leuer. ; The first leaf is blank except for signature-mark "A". ; With a final errata leaf. ; Heading to dedication in seven lines. Variant: heading in eight lines. ; Reproduction of the original the Union Theological Seminary (New York, N.Y.). Library.

Based on two studies with Bosniak and Croatian students in Bosnia and Herzegovina, this paper analyzes the effects of religiosity on intergroup forgiveness and reconciliation. Both Christianity and Islam advance forgiveness and reconciliation as one of the major moral imperatives. Previous studies also indicate that religiosity can increase readiness to grant forgiveness on the inter-personal level and facilitate rapprochement. When it comes to inter-group level, prescripts of religious piety often conflict with norms of group solidarity and care. Another set of research suggests that religion obstructs conflict transformation due to the dogmatic reasoning it promotes, including reframing of immanent disputes in transcendental (and thus non-negotiable) terms. This study initially tested whether adding religious symbols to conflict narratives impacts prosocial attitudes of respondents and came with negative results. In other words, adding religious codes to already known narratives about conflicts did not have a significant impact on participants' attitudes. In a subsequent SEM analysis, it was found that religiosity in both groups is strongly correlated with group-centricity, which negatively mediates its relationship with both forgiveness and reconciliation. We conclude that collectivistic forms of religiosity that privilege ingroup solidarity might have negative effects on intergroup forgiveness and reconciliation in post-conflict settings.

Based on two studies with Bosniak and Croatian students in Bosnia and Herzegovina, this paper analyzes the effects of religiosity on intergroup forgiveness and reconciliation. Both Christianity and Islam advance forgiveness and reconciliation as one of the major moral imperatives. Previous studies also indicate that religiosity can increase readiness to grant forgiveness on the inter-personal level and facilitate rapprochement. When it comes to inter-group level, prescripts of religious piety often conflict with norms of group solidarity and care. Another set of research suggests that religion obstructs conflict transformation due to the dogmatic reasoning it promotes, including reframing of immanent disputes in transcendental (and thus non-negotiable) terms. This study initially tested whether adding religious symbols to conflict narratives impacts prosocial attitudes of respondents and came with negative results. In other words, adding religious codes to already known narratives about conflicts did not have a significant impact on participants' attitudes. In a subsequent SEM analysis, it was found that religiosity in both groups is strongly correlated with group-centricity, which negatively mediates its relationship with both forgiveness and reconciliation. We conclude that collectivistic forms of religiosity that privilege ingroup solidarity might have negative effects on intergroup forgiveness and reconciliation in post-conflict settings.

[6], 36 p. ; Attributed to Peter Heylyn. Cf. BM. ; Signed: E.Y. ; Reproduction of original in Huntington Library.

1 broadside : ill. ; Date of publication suggested by Wing. ; Reproduction of the original in the Society of Antiquaries Library, London.

1 broadside. ; At head of title: God saue the King. ; Date of imprint suggested by STC (2nd ed.). ; "Given vnder oure signet at Edinburgh the twentie sext day of Julie, and of reigne the first yeere. 1625." ; Reproduction of original in the Town House (Aberdeen, Scotland). Charter Room.

[8] p. ; Reproduction of original in Thomason Collection, British Library.

Contains manuscript waste in binding; both fragments form 1 leaf of Peter Lombard's commentary on the Psalms. ; Inscribed at head of leaf [1] recto: "Ex dono Richardi Russell". ; Wing CD-ROM seems to imply, in error, that the printer's name is on the title page. ; Annotation on Thomason copy: "March 22 1643" (Lady Day dating). ; Probably issued with "The vow and covenant appointed by ye Lords & Commons assembled in Parliament" (Wing (2nd ed., 1994) E2460) and "The protestation w:ch the knights, citizens, and burgesses, in ye Commons house of Parliament, made, ye 3d. of May. 1642" (Wing (2nd ed.) E2690, cancelled in Wing 2nd ed., 1994). ; Engraved throughout. The panels comprising the eight pages were engraved together on one large plate and printed through masks one panel to each recto; cf. ESTC. ; Caption title; first line ("a solemn") flanked by numerals "16" and "43". ; Publisher's name from recto of leaf [4]; place and date of publication from Wing. ; With: The vow and covenant appoynted by ye Lords & Commons assembled in Parliament, to be taken by euery man, in ye cities of London, Westminster, ye suburbs & liberties thereof, & throughout ye whole kingdome. ; With: The protestation w[hi]ch the knights, citizens, and burgesses, in ye Commons house of Parliament, made, ye 3d. of May. 1642. ; Wing (CD-ROM, 1996) ; Thomason ; ESTC (online) ; Mode of access: Internet.

[2], 34 p. ; Marginal notes. ; Reproduction of the original in the Harvard University Library.

[2], 30 p. ; A reissue, with cancel t.p., of his Of resisting the lawfull magistrate upon colour of religion, London, 1643. ; Reproduction of original in Huntington Library.