Pow!
In: Radical philosophy: a journal of socialist and feminist philosophy, Heft 166, S. 56-57
ISSN: 0300-211X
339981 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Radical philosophy: a journal of socialist and feminist philosophy, Heft 166, S. 56-57
ISSN: 0300-211X
In: Political studies: the journal of the Political Studies Association of the United Kingdom, Band 71, Heft 1, S. 3-19
ISSN: 1467-9248
There are two rival conceptions of power in modern sociopolitical thought. According to one, all social power reduces to power-over-others. According to another, the core notion is power-to-effect-outcomes, to which even power-over reduces. This article defends seven theses. First, agential social power consists in a relation between agent and outcomes (power-to). Second, not all social power reduces to power-over and, third, the contrary view stems from conflating power-over with a distinct notion: power-despite-resistance. Fourth, the widespread assumption that social power presupposes the capacity to overcome resistance is false: social power includes the capacity to effect outcomes with others' assistance. Fifth, power-with can be exercised via joint intentional action, strategic coordination and non-strategic coordination. Sixth, agential social power is best analysed as a capacity to effect outcomes, with the assistance of others, despite the resistance of yet others. Seventh, power-over and power-with are not mutually exclusive: each can ground the other.
In: Administration in social work, Band 9, Heft 2, S. 99-111
ISSN: 0364-3107
In: Monthly Review, Band 23, Heft 11, S. 50
ISSN: 0027-0520
In: Journal of political power, Band 14, Heft 1, S. 51-71
ISSN: 2158-3803
In: Policing and society: an international journal of research and policy, Band 25, Heft 4, S. 437-438
ISSN: 1477-2728
ISSN: 1535-4245
In: Journal of political power, Band 5, Heft 1, S. 73-89
ISSN: 2158-3803
The power of media is outlined and the effects of mass media on the public opinion and on the parliamentary election. In the book the role of the political intellectuals is analyzed in detail and the battles of intellectuals of the opposite political camps on the field of the language of politics.