Search results

The article discusses posthumanist tendencies occurring in the so-called Science and Technology Studies (STS), concentrating mainly upon B. Latour's Actor-Network Theory (ANT). Postconstructivist conceptions within STS emphasize the crucial role of material situatedness of technoscience that is dependent on non-humans in laboratory practice (allowingto extend and "delegate" cognitive capacities to the environment). What is more, ANT accepts the radical thesis ofnon-human agency. The text also analyses a larger posthumanist political trend present in STS and in other theories, rejecting the arrogance It emerges as an inevitable reaction towards the problem of possible ecological destabilization (modern systemic risk or axiological/political challenges created by the so-called "wet" technologies, such as biotechnology, biomedicine, pharmacology). ; The article discusses posthumanist tendencies occurring in the so-called Science and Technology Studies (STS), concentrating mainly upon B. Latour's Actor-Network Theory (ANT). Postconstructivist conceptions within STS emphasize the crucial role of material situatedness of technoscience that is dependent on non-humans in laboratory practice (allowingto extend and "delegate" cognitive capacities to the environment). What is more, ANT accepts the radical thesis ofnon-human agency. The text also analyses a larger posthumanist political trend present in STS and in other theories, rejecting the arrogance It emerges as an inevitable reaction towards the problem of possible ecological destabilization (modern systemic risk or axiological/political challenges created by the so-called "wet" technologies, such as biotechnology, biomedicine, pharmacology).

The article discusses posthumanist tendencies occurring in the so-called Science and Technology Studies (STS), concentrating mainly upon B. Latour's Actor-Network Theory (ANT). Postconstructivist conceptions within STS emphasize the crucial role of material situatedness of technoscience that is dependent on non-humans in laboratory practice (allowingto extend and "delegate" cognitive capacities to the environment). What is more, ANT accepts the radical thesis ofnon-human agency. The text also analyses a larger posthumanist political trend present in STS and in other theories, rejecting the arrogance It emerges as an inevitable reaction towards the problem of possible ecological destabilization (modern systemic risk or axiological/political challenges created by the so-called "wet" technologies, such as biotechnology, biomedicine, pharmacology). ; The article discusses posthumanist tendencies occurring in the so-called Science and Technology Studies (STS), concentrating mainly upon B. Latour's Actor-Network Theory (ANT). Postconstructivist conceptions within STS emphasize the crucial role of material situatedness of technoscience that is dependent on non-humans in laboratory practice (allowingto extend and "delegate" cognitive capacities to the environment). What is more, ANT accepts the radical thesis ofnon-human agency. The text also analyses a larger posthumanist political trend present in STS and in other theories, rejecting the arrogance It emerges as an inevitable reaction towards the problem of possible ecological destabilization (modern systemic risk or axiological/political challenges created by the so-called "wet" technologies, such as biotechnology, biomedicine, pharmacology).

The article discusses posthumanist tendencies occurring in the so-called Science and Technology Studies (STS), concentrating mainly upon B. Latour's Actor-Network Theory (ANT). Postconstructivist conceptions within STS emphasize the crucial role of material situatedness of technoscience that is dependent on non-humans in laboratory practice (allowing to extend and "delegate" cognitive capacities to the environment). What is more, ANT accepts the radical thesis of non-human agency. The text also analyses a larger posthumanist political trend present in STS and in other theories, rejecting the arrogance It emerges as an inevitable reaction towards the problem of possible ecological destabilization (modern systemic risk or axiological/political challenges created by the so-called "wet" technologies, such as biotechnology, biomedicine, pharmacology).

Dieser Band ist die erste deutschsprachige sozialanthropologische Einführung in das Feld der Science and Technology Studies - ein Forschungsfeld, das sich der empirischen Untersuchung des alltäglichen Zusammenspiels von Wissenschaft, Technologie und gesellschaftlicher Ordnung widmet. Der sozialanthropologische Zugriff stellt neben den grundlegenden theoretischen und methodischen Aspekten klassische sowie neuere ethnographische Arbeiten in den Mittelpunkt und diskutiert die Bedeutung von Materialität, Wissen und Praxis sowie von Infrastrukturen und Klassifikationen für das Verständnis von Wissenschaft und Technik.

Over the past thirty years, intersectionality has become a nearly ubiquitous framework for understanding, critiquing, and intervening in complex social inequalities. Emerging from critical race and feminist studies, intersectionality has many shared analytic priorities with science and technology studies (STS), including an emphasis on co-emergent social forces, historical contingency, and interventions that challenge and enhance knowledge production. Despite these shared affinities, STS and intersectionality remain largely nonoverlapping scholarly discourses. Based on a systematic review of intersectionality in eight STS journals, we observe a slight increase in intersectionality's usage over time but find that its relevance is contained largely to venues outside of the STS mainstream. Our study identifies some ways STS scholars have modeled intersectionality's responsible use through citation practices, methodological integration, and normative claims about justice/injustice. We also consider what epistemic exclusion of intersectionality might foreclose. We argue that increased use of intersectionality would amplify engagement with justice in STS work, not only by introducing new questions and theoretical frames but also opening possibilities for new interdisciplinary formations. This is not simply an argument for greater inclusion of a term, but rather for transformation in epistemic accountability toward feminist studies and other social justice–oriented fields.

Anknüpfend an aktuelle Diskussionen in den Gender/Queer Studies kombiniert der vorliegende Aufsatz eine queere Perspektive mit dem Konzept des Geschlechterwissens, um sich der Produktion von wissenschaftlichem Geschlechterwissen zu widmen. Dabei steht die Herstellung marginaler/hegemonialer Positionen und Normsetzungen in der in den letzten zwei Jahrzehnten hochdotierten und den Medien entsprechend stark präsenten Hirnforschung im Fokus. Basierend auf einer queeren Perspektive aus den Science and Technology Studies werden zwei psychologische Untersuchungen zu Geschlecht und Intelligenz exemplarisch hinsichtlich ihres Beitrages zur Stabilisierung und Reproduktion des Systems der Zweigeschlechtlichkeit analysiert. Fragen, die an die zwei Studien gerichtet werden, lauten: Welcher theoretische Standpunkt wurde gewählt, welche Konzepte fehlen? Welche Methoden kamen in den Studien zur Anwendung? Welche Ergebnisse werden (nicht) hervorgehoben? Welches wissenschaftliche Geschlechterwissen wird durch die Forschung produziert?

What is it about the structure and organisation of science and technology that has led to the spectacularly successful growth of knowledge during this century? This book answers this important and much debated question in an innovative way, by using computer simulations. The computer simulation of societies and social processes is a methodology which is rapidly becoming recognised for its potential in the social sciences. This book will be among the first to apply the tools of simulation systematically to a specific domain: science and technology studies. The first introductory section is followed by three application areas: simulations of scientific discovery and theory formation; evolutionary models of science and technology; and models which explore the conditions and dependencies of scientific work

Biographical note: Stefan Beck (Prof. Dr.) lehrt Europäische Ethnologie an der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin und forscht im Feld der Wissen(schaft)santhropologie. Jörg Niewöhner (PhD) leitet das Labor Sozialanthropologische Wissenschafts- und Technikforschung der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin und forscht zur Anthropologie der Lebenswissenschaften und urbaner Ökologien. Estrid Sörensen (PhD) ist Juniorprofessorin für Kulturpsychologie und Räume anthropologischen Wissens an der Ruhr-Universität Bochum. Sie forscht zur Produktion und Zirkulation von Wissen über jugendgefährdende Medien und zur Kulturpsychologie der Materialität.